ISIOD(8th century b.C) SAID FROM CHAOS THE HARMONY

----- Original Message -----
From: Joost van Steenis
To: downwithelite@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:24 PM
Subject: Take the benefit away and the reason for greed disappears


Making the world of the rich inhabitable.



The world is motivated by money, not by the idea that all people should have the same status and thus a decent life. The most awful consequence of this domination of money are the ten million kids that die each year before they are five years old.



The domination of money should stop.



This cannot be done by prohibiting high earnings. Time and again it is proved that financial instruments as taxes have not much influence on the earnings of the rich (and the criminals). The income of the top one percent of the population is increasing faster than that of the other 99 percent. The world of the rich, the eliteworld, is hardly disturbed by measures taken by their servants on high posts in the government and the (financial) industry where the People have no influence.



The eliteworld is a quiet and safe world, well protected from invasions of masspeople who live in the often harsh massworld.

Change will not occur when the eliteworld is not invaded, when the elite can continue to live its exclusive and privileged life.

Only when the eliteworld is made inhabitable, when chaos starts to reign in the world of the rich, the chance on a fundamental change will grow.



Therefore I called my last book “From Chaos to Change, entering a New Era” in which money is not the driving motive. You can download the book for free on http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis/chaoschange.pdf You can get a signed paperback copy by sending 10 euro via Paypal to downwithelite@gmail.com



But how can the masses disturb the eliteworld?

We do not need to analyse how the elite has continued to reign for many centuries.
We do not have to analyse why the elite takes the wrong measures. 0n the contrary, they do it quite well – for their own benefit.

These analyses are made many times but it did not change the domination of the rich over the masses

We only have to look at how the elite benefits from its domination, how they use the benefits. Then the conclusion is evident.



The reason of the domination of money is the possibility of a few privileged and powerful persons to acquire items that common people never can buy.

Not only gadgets as a watch of a million euro but also houses as castles, private planes, exclusive education, excellent medical care, etceteras.

In short, anything you can buy when you spend more than 200,000 euro in one year.

Spending 200,000 euro in one year should be the limit!



These benefits can be disturbed. When the disturbance increases the elite will realise that they have to live a life that is comparable to the life of common citizens, who have reasonable medical care, good education, a house in which you cannot get lost, standing in the queue when you are going to your work and a cheaper watch that also tells you exactly how late it is.



Individual differences remain to exist and will even increase when they are not anymore drowned by the quest for still more money. Money eclipses creativity because all activities are dominated by the question “What is in it for me”.

Activities should be guided by the idea that anything done must be good for humanity, must be fun or interesting to do, must promote special human characteristics as inventiveness, creativity, pleasure and curiosity.



Pleasure and curiosity are already sufficient reasons to restrict spending to 200,000 euro in one year.



Joost van Steenis



For background information see “Down with any Elite” http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis or read my books.
My last book FROM CHAOS TO CHANGE can be downloaded for free from http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis/chaoschange.pdf.
You get a SIGNED PAPERBACK edition by sending 10 euro by paypal to downwithelite@gmail.com.

You regularly can receive my new articles by sending an empty email with the subject subscribe to downwithelite@gmail.com

THE DESTRUCTION OF NATION MADE BY JEWS

THE SAME INVASION OF ILLIGAL IMMIGRANTS HAPPENS IN GREECE . IN A POPULATION OF 10 MILLIONS INDIGENOUS ADDED MORE THAN 4 MILLION IMMIGRANTS FROM ANY COUNTRY, MOST OF THEM UNEMPLOYED . THEY COME FROM IRAQ , AFGANISTAN, PAKISTAN AND AFRICA. THIS IS THE MAIN CAUSE FOR THE GREEK BANKRUPCY , BUT NOBODY DARE TO TELL IT.
THIS IS THE JEWISH NEW WORL ORDER !!!

AMPHIKTYON

----- Original Message -----
From: REAL NEWS
To: kostas01@otenet.gr
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 1:23 AM
Subject: DISPLACING LANGUAGE & CULTURE


(Common sense, politically incorrect newsletter to 14,602 subscribers)
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN DIVERSITY DISPLACES THE
HOST COUNTRY'S LANGUAGE AND CULTURE?
By Frosty Wooldridge Denver Post August 24, 2010
For the past 30 years, somebody, somewhere, or a group of people in
high places decided to destroy the successful equation of "melting pot"
within America. That 'entity' decided to pitch diversity and
multiculturalism as the new monikers dismantling English as America's
common language. "It" decided to inject hundreds of incompatible
cultures and languages into America while adding another 100 million
people to stress the environment even further.
That same "It" worked its magic in France, Great Britain, Holland,
Norway, France, Belgium and other countries -- with devastating results:
fragmenting, balkanizing and separated societies.
Like a group of chemistry students in a classroom where the teacher
leaves for an emergency phone call -- for kicks or giggles -- the
students start tossing multiple chemicals into a test tube to see what
happens. Result: the mixture either melts the tube down or explodes.
No one knows what kind of volatility may occur.
Today, our once "stable and sustainable" population suffered growth
from a reasonable 194 million people in 1963 to a unsustainable 309
million in 2010. While we continue 'celebrating' our amazingly 'diverse'
society with immigrants from over 150 countries, speaking 100
languages -- in reality, the wheels fall off the 'romantic' pitch by
newspapers such as the Denver Post and television networks across the
USA. You will hear "racist confrontations" in dozens of media outlets
weekly.
On the educational side, Brian Williams reported a 76 percent
dropout/flunkout rate in Detroit, Michigan schools last spring. Why?
They feature 50 different languages and unending diversity. Everyone
speaks a slew of languages except English, they don't know Thomas
Jefferson, promote their own cultures and they call themselves
hyphenated-Americans. Illiteracy rates exceed 50 percent according to an
article in Time Magazine. (Source: Tragedy of Detroit, Time Magazine)
But hundreds of schools throughout the USA in major cities like LA,
San Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Miami, Denver and
others suffer 50 to 60 percent dropout/flunkout rates. Denver vacillates
between 52 to 67 percent dropout/flunkout rates. Brian Williams added,
"About 1.2 million teens hit the streets every spring unable to read or
write."
What happens when this country finds itself without a common
language, culture and national identity? What happens when enough
immigrants do not, cannot or will not integrate into American society?
What happens when their cultures and languages trump America's culture
and English language? Today, 42 million Americans cannot read or write.
Another 50 million read at the fourth grade level. Name the one term
that defines third world societies: illiteracy. America degrades with
every illiterate citizen.
You can see it accelerating in Islamic Detroit, Michigan. Already,
we hear calls for Sharia Law. For Americans that don't understand
Sharia -- it runs counter to everything in Western law. It subjugates
women, commits barbaric acts such as female genital mutilation and calls
for honor killings of women for minor infractions. Mexican reconquista
operates in the Southwest and children continue to fare poorly in schools
after several generations because of their 'poverty culture' roots in
Mexico. In Arizona last week, immigrants painted the American flag with
Nazi swastikas and stomped on it at the capital in Phoenix.
Other examples:
In New York, February 16, 2009, FOX News, Joshua Rhett Miller
reported, "The estranged wife of a Muslim television executive feared for
her life after filing for divorce last month from her abusive husband,"
her attorney said -- and was found beheaded Thursday in his upstate New
York television studio. Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37, was found dead on Thursday
at the offices of Bridges TV in Orchard Park, N.Y., near Buffalo. Her
husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, has reportedly been charged with
second-degree murder.
Adam Gadahn: The California-born Muslim convert assists Shukrijumah
and Osama bin Laden as al-Qaida's chief propagandist. He tailors the
group's message to American Muslims. In 2006, Gadahn invoked U.S.
Muslims to attack military bases. Three years later, U.S. Army Major
Hasan shot 43, killing 13 at Fort Hood.
Anwar Awlaki: Articulate and media savvy, the American-born cleric
is al-Qaida's top recruiter of Western suicide cells. Awlaki has
recruited or radicalized countless homegrown terrorists, including the
Fort Hood shooter and the Times Square bomber, both English-speaking
citizens. Authorities also believe he ordered the Christmas airliner
attack. Thought to be bin Laden's heir, Awlaki has called on American
Muslims to turn against their government, "Jihad against America is
binding on every other (American) Muslim," he said.
For Americans that cherish the successful "melting pot" concept, at
what point do they lose control of their culture, language and way of
life -- in favor of a polyglot of incompatible cultures, religions and
languages?
At what point will all those countries 'exhausting' their excess
population into America, take responsibility for their own fecundity and
their own citizens, in their own countries?
At what point will Americans stand up for being Americans? On every
level -- unrelenting and accelerating immigration cannot be sustained
environmentally, educationally, linguistically or culturally -- if
America hopes to survive the 21st century.
Latest figures show the USA adding 70 million immigrants within 25
years. Can we remain sustainable? Ask anyone in Bangladesh, Mexico or
India!
--Frosty Wooldridge presents "The Coming Population Crisis in America:
and what you can do about it" to civic clubs, church groups, high schools
and colleges. He is the author of: America on the Brink: The Next Added
100 Million Americans.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For free Politically Incorrect news ignored by the American news media,
send your friends' email addresses for REAL NEWS from thenewsman@ij.net.
To cancel your free REAL NEWS, click "reply" and type "stop messages".

ALBERT EINSTAIN: PLAGIARIST & FRAUD

Having the most money gave them the upper hand in business, and they in perpetuity captured all the valuable industries in the world: Rockefeller’s oil, Morgan’s railroads, Marx’s politics, Sassoon’s drugs to China, Monsanto’s slaves, Lehman’s carpetbagging, Freud’s psychology, Meyer’s Hollywood, Einstein’s physics(Plagiarist and Fraud), Irving Berlin’s music monopoly, Warburg’s Federal Reserve scam, Oppenheimer’s Jewish hell bomb, Betty Friedan’s housewives, Abbie Hoffman’s hippies, Bronfman’s booze, Henry Kissinger’s assassinations and genocides, Norman Lear’s sitcoms, Bill Gates’s computers,Gearge Soros the hedge funds ,East Europe and Balkan . . . and so on.

AMPHIKTYON
http://amphiktyon.blogspot.com/

----- Original Message -----
From: Len Cranford
To: tm_metzger@yahoo.com ; Bob in DC ; General K. Konstantinidis ; Tom Mysiewicz
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:44 PM
Subject: Einstein Plagiarist: print.htm


{Ha! And you should see the Jew Mega - THEFT in ancient Religion!}
Albert Einstein: Plagiarist and Fraud

Ian Moseley – Altermedia August 17, 2010

Albert Einstein is today revered as “the Father of Modern Science”. His wrinkled face and wild hair has become a symbol for scientific genius and “his” famous E = mc^2 equation is repeatedly used as the symbol for something scientific and intellectual. And yet there has for years been mounting evidence that this “Father of Modern Science” was nothing but a con man, lying about his ideas and achievements, and stealing the work and the research of others.

The most glaring evidence against Einstein concerns “his” most famous equation. One website notes “The equation E=mc^2, which has been forever linked to Einstein & his Theory of Relativity was not originally published by Einstein. According to Umberto Bartocci, a professor at the University of Perugia and a historian of mathematics, this famous equation was first published by Olinto De Pretto …two years prior to Einstein’s publishing of the equation. In 1903 De Pretto published his equation in the scientific magazine Atte and in 1904 it was republished by the Royal Science Institute of Veneto. Einstein’s research was not published until 1905… Einstein was well versed in Italian and even lived in Northern Italy for a brief time.”

It is unheard of to pass over the original inventor of an equation and to give credit to someone, who claims to have derived it AFTER the equation and its derivation have been published. The equation “E=mc^2″ should be called the “De Pretto Equation” not the “Einstein Equation.”

This raises the question: “What sort of man was Einstein?” Is there evidence that he may have been prone to unethical behavior? One website reports “Einstein… was still far from the ideal husband. A year before they married, Maric gave birth to a daughter, Lieserl, while Einstein was away. The child’s fate is unknown – she is presumed to have been given up for adoption, perhaps under pressure from Einstein, who is thought to have never seen his first born. After the marriage, Mileva bore two sons but the family was not to stay together. Einstein began an affair with his cousin Elsa Lowenthal while on a trip to Berlin in 1912, leaving Mileva and his family two years later. Einstein and Mileva finally divorced in 1919, but not until after Einstein sent his wife a list of ‘conditions’ under which he was willing to remain married. The list included such autocratic demands as ‘You are neither to expect intimacy nor to reproach me in any way’. After the divorce, he saw little of his sons. The elder, Hans Albert, later reflected ‘Probably the only project he ever gave up on was me.’ The younger, Eduard, was diagnosed with schizophrenia and died in an asylum. Einstein married Elsa soon after the divorce, but a few years later began an affair with Betty Neumann, the niece of a friend… Accusations of plagiarism aren’t limited to Mileva – it’s also been claimed that Einstein stole the work of a host of other physicists. One question which may remain moot is quite how much Einstein drew from the work of Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincare in formulating the theory of special relativity. Elements of Einstein’s 1905 paper paralleled parts of a 1904 paper by Lorentz and a contemporary paper by Poincare. Although Einstein read earlier papers by the two, he claimed not to have seen these later works before writing the 1905 paper. One apparently damning fact is that the 1905 paper on special relativity had no references, suggesting that Einstein was consciously hiding his tracks.”

One source notes “David Hilbert submitted an article containing the correct field equations for general relativity five days before Einstein.” Another source notes “Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.” Apparently Hilbert’s work was soon to become “Einstein’s work.”

The historic record is readily available and the truth is known to many scientists and historians, even if they are afraid to say anything. The idea that light had a finite speed was proven by Michelson and Morley decades before Einstein. Hendrik Lorentz determined the equations showing relativistic time and length contractions which become significant as the speed of light is approached. These gentlemen along with David Hilbert and Olinto De Pretto have been airbrushed out of the picture so that Einstein could be given the credit for what they had done.

Einstein appeared to latch onto his first wife, a much more talented student three years his senior, to compensate for his own limited abilities. Another website notes: “…in 1927, H. Thirring wrote, ‘H. Poincare had already completely solved the problem of time several years before the appearance of Einstein’s first work (1905). . . .’ Sir Edmund Whittaker in his detailed survey, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Volume II, (1953), included a chapter entitled ‘The Relativity Theory of Poincare and Lorentz’. Whittaker thoroughly documented the development of the theory, documenting the authentic history, and demonstrated through reference to primary sources that Einstein held no priority for the vast majority of the theory. Einstein offered no counter-argument to Whittaker’s famous book. . .”

Einstein was a minor contributor at best and in any case an intellectual thief and pretentious braggart. Einstein was still alive when Whitaker’s book was published and he said NOTHING about it. No libel suit, no refutation, no public comment at all.

Einstein was the first great fraudster and idea-thief in modern science. His theft of Olinto De Pretto’s equation E = mc^2 gave him considerable scientific credibility which he built a career on. De Pretto was not a career physicist and spent his life as an industrialist, passing away in 1921. De Pretto had published his equation twice before Einstein and was no doubt amazed that someone could claim credit for his work. Einstein used and eventually discarded his first wife, Mileva, who was a much more brilliant student than Einstein and is suspected of writing much of Einstein’s early work. (She may have been reluctant to expose Einstein since he was still the father of her children.) David Hilbert’s work on the equations for Special Relativity was submitted for publication before Einstein and was sent to Einstein as correspondence. Einstein claimed credit for the equations which Hilbert derived. (David Hilbert passed away in 1943.)

Some university professors have stolen work from their graduate students and it would be interesting to see if any of Einstein’s students complained of such thievery. A plagiarist seldom stops plagiarizing especially when he keeps getting away with it. Complaints against Einstein however seem to disappear down the Orwellian memory hole. Einstein is clearly a sacred cow to many. A few have even used the word “heresy” to describe serious well-documented criticism and charges of plagiarism against Einstein. The truth eventually wins out and Einstein will someday be best known as a great fraud instead of a great physicist
http://us.altermedia.info/news-of-interest-to-white-people/albert-einstein-plagiarist-and-fraud-2_7593.html#more-7593

Last updated 25/08/2010

WRITE TO THE INDIAN PRIME MINISTER FOR UNLIMITED LIABILITY

PLEASE WRITE A LETTER TO THE INDIAN PRIME MINISTER MANMOHAN SINGH DEMANDING FOR UNLIMITED LIABILITY . REMEMBER THE MOBAL ACCIDENT . MORE YOU WILL SEE IN THE SITE. THANKS

AMPHIKTYON

----- Original Message -----
From: Karuna@greenpeace.in ; Raina@greenpeace.in ; Greenpeace India
To: kostas01@otenet.gr
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 12:31 PM
Subject: Thanks for writing


Dear kostas,

Thank you for writing to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Your letter will help strengthen the demand for unlimited liability.

More letters demanding unlimited liability will help convince him about the opposition to this bill.

Can you ask your friends and family to write to the PM as well?

http://www.greenpeace.org/india/unlimited-liability/thank-you

Thanks a billion!

--The Greenpeace India team

GENERAL GEORGE PATTON VICTIM OF THE JEW

----- Original Message -----
From: TRA
To: AB
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:57 AM
Subject: Fw: Fw: Ike's orders to assassinate General Patton





General George Patton was murdered for the same reasons John F. Kennedy was murdered.

He was a serious threat to International zionism and he intended to oppose it.



Why The Zionists (Including
Henry Morganthau) Controlling
The Allies Killed
General George S. Patton
From Dick Eastman
olfriend@nwinfo.net
From Gavin Oughton
2-29-7
At the end of World War II, one of America's top military leaders accurately assessed the shift in the balance of world power which that war had produced and foresaw the enormous danger of communist aggression against the West. Alone among U.S. leaders he warned that America should act immediately, while her supremacy was unchallengeable, to end that danger. Unfortunately, his warning went unheeded, and he was quickly silenced by a convenient "accident" which took his life.
Thirty-two years ago, in the terrible summer of 1945, the U.S. Army had just completed the destruction of Europe and had set up a government of military occupation amid the ruins to rule the starving Germans and deal out victors' justice to the vanquished. General George S. Patton, commander of the U.S. Third Army, became military governor of the greater portion of the American occupation zone of Germany.
Patton was regarded as the "fightingest" general in all the Allied forces. He was considerably more audacious and aggressive than most commanders, and his martial ferocity may very well have been the deciding factor which led to the Allied victory. He personally commanded his forces in many of the toughest and most decisive battles of the war: in Tunisia, in Sicily, in the cracking of the Siegfried Line, in holding back the German advance during the Battle of the Bulge, in the exceptionally bloody fighting around Bastogne in December 1944 and January 1945.
During the war Patton had respected the courage and the fighting qualities of the Germans -- especially when he compared them with those of some of America's allies -- but he had also swallowed whole the hate-inspired wartime propaganda generated by America's alien media masters.
He believed Germany was a menace to America's freedom and that Germany's National Socialist government was an especially evil institution. Acting on these beliefs he talked incessantly of his desire to kill as many Germans as possible, and he exhorted his troops to have the same goal. These bloodthirsty exhortations led to the nickname "Blood and Guts" Patton.
It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military governor of Germany -- after he had gotten to know both the Germans and America's "gallant Soviet allies" -- that Patton's understanding of the true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many letters to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government officials, he expressed his new understanding and his apprehensions for the future. His diary and his letters were published in 1974 by the Houghton Mifflin Company under the title The Patton Papers.
Several months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.
On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army.
Patton said to Patterson: "Let's keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect."
Patterson replied, "Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture."
Patton rejoined: "I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe. We have lost the war!"
Patton's urgent and prophetic advice went unheeded by Patterson and the other politicians and only served to give warning about Patton's feelings to the alien conspirators behind the scenes in New York, Washington, and Moscow.
The more he saw of the Soviets, the stronger Patton's conviction grew that the proper course of action would be to stifle Communism then and there, while the chance existed.
Later in May 1945, he attended several meetings and social affairs
with top Red Army officers, and he evaluated them carefully. He noted in his diary on May 14: "I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few exceptions, give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits."
And Patton's aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14: "Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of virility and cruelty."
Nevertheless, Patton knew that the Americans could whip the Reds then -- but perhaps not later. On May 18 he noted in his diary: "In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to right the Russians, the sooner we do it the better."
Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: "If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger."
Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of action which would have freed all of eastern Europe from the communist yoke with the expenditure of far less American blood than was spilled in Korea and Vietnam and would have obviated both those later wars not to mention World War III -- Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of the people for whom World War II was fought: the Jews.
Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized.
He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP's) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that "these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor."
He described in his diary one DP camp, "where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."
Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part: "This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."
These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings: "Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race, Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."
One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton's thinking on the conquered Germans was the behavior of America's controlled news media toward them. At a press conference in Regensburg, Germany, on May 8, 1945, immediately after Germany's surrender, Patton was asked whether he planned to treat captured SS troops differently from other German POW's. His answer was: "No. SS means no more in Germany than being a Democrat in America -- that is not to be quoted. I mean by that that initially the SS people were special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed they ran out of sons of bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will be treated as criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was drafted into this outfit . . ."
Despite Patton's request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly seized on it, and Jews and their front men in America screamed in outrage over Patton's comparison of the SS and the Democratic Party as well as over his announced intention of treating most SS prisoners humanely.
Patton refused to take hints from the press, however, and his disagreement with the American occupation policy formulated in Washington grew. Later in May he said to his brother-in-law: "I think that this non-fraternization is very stupid. If we are going to keep American soldiers in a country, they have to have some civilians to talk to. Furthermore, I think we could do a lot for the German civilians by letting our soldiers talk to their young people."
Various of Patton's colleagues tried to make it perfectly clear what was expected of him. One politically ambitious officer, Brig. Gen. Philip S. Gage, anxious to please the powers that be, wrote to Patton: "Of course, I know that even your extensive powers are limited, but I do hope that wherever and whenever you can you will do what you can to make the German populace suffer. For God's sake, please don't ever go soft in regard to them. Nothing could ever be too bad for them."
But Patton continued to do what he thought was right, whenever he could. With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP's -- part of the famous "six million" who had supposedly been gassed -- but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany's economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote: "I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are being blown up -- that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war -- can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons."
Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution of every German who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said: "I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff . It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign lands, where many will be starved to death."
Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife he commented: "I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."
And in his diary he noted:, "Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles."
His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.
After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: "Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."
This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: "It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism."
Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."
By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being "soft on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a "yellow-bellied Jew."
Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme to needle Patton into losing his temper and making statements which could be used against him. The scheme worked. The press interpreted one of Patton's answers to their insistent questions as to why he was not pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as: "The Nazi thing is just like a Democrat-Republican fight." The New York Times headlined this quote, and other papers all across America picked it up.
The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press conference finally opened Patton's eyes fully as to what was afoot. In his diary that night lie wrote: "There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs. They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law . . . Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP's, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because the answer is that, in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid we have waited too long."
And in a letter of the same date to his wife: "I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in catching Nazis. I can't tell them the truth that unless we restore Germany we will insure that communism takes America."
Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and "kick him upstairs" as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe."
But even his change of duties did not shut Patton up. In his diary entry of October 1 we find the observation: "In thinking over the situation, I could not but be impressed with the belief that at the present moment the unblemished record of the American Army for non-political activities is about to be lost. Everyone seems to be more interested in the effects which his actions will have on his political future than in carrying out the motto of the United States Military Academy, 'Duty, Honor, Country.' I hope that after the current crop of political aspirants has been gathered our former tradition will be restored."
And Patton continued to express these sentiments to his friends -- and those he thought were his friends. On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States. In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower's pusillanimous behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things were causing.
He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America's enemies: "I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every other commander. In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders, because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do."
His denunciation of the politicization of the Army was scathing: "All the general officers in the higher brackets receive each morning from the War Department a set of American (newspaper) headlines, and, with the sole exception of myself, they guide themselves during the ensuing day by what they have read in the papers. . . ."
In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America's future by not opposing the growing Soviet might: "It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start an all-out offensive . . . ."
Two months later, on December 23, 1945, General George S. Patton was silenced forever.



--- On Wed, 8/18/10, TRA wrote:


From: TRA
Subject: Fw: Ike's orders to assassinate General Patton
To: "AB"
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 5:00 PM



This one has been smoking across the internet. Why? No idea. But it is very interesting.
Not the kind of history you will find on television or in the history books.

Subject: Fw: Ike's orders to assassinate General Patton



>
> Eisenhower's Death Camps.. a U.S. Prison guard's
> story..http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=135
>
> a gallery of photos.. camps and events.
> Images for german prisoner's death camp ...
>
> Unmasking The Terrible Swedish Jew
> Donald Cassidy – December 2006
>
> Like most Americans, "I liked Ike". He was the epitome of the American
> Dream. From farm boy he rose to five star general and president of the
> United States. Or was it a secret Zionist-Jew Dream? After all, we
> live in an Zionist media monopoly which "Einsteins"* its favored
> individuals. Was Eisenhower the humanitarian history portrays? What is
> the reality?
>
> Ike was raised in Kansas and attended West Point. There he was known as
> the "Terrible Swedish Jew". His army career like his West Point
> standing was mediocre. In the thirties after serving with MacArthur,
> MacArthur called him, "the best clerk I ever had". He was mostly a
> staff officer who never had a command. But Eisenhower had a most
> important "friend", the avid Zionist-Jew, Bernard Baruch, who rescued
> Eisenhower from obscurity. Baruch was one of the most powerful men in
> America with direct access, as advisor and financier, to President
> Roosevelt. Baruch was the hidden mentor behind Eisenhower in World War
> II as well as his presidency (secret money/power networks in
> government).
>
> In 1940 Eisenhower was a major. In 1941 he was promoted to colonel and
> then to brigadier. The following year he was promoted to major general
> and then to Commanding General of the entire European Allied Army,
> jumping over dozens of officers who were more qualified including
> George Patton. His meteoric rise was totally unjustified by his record
> in the Army. It was undoubtedly due to the Zionist-Jews in Washington,
> Baruch, Morganthau, etc., who wanted a Zionist-Jew in charge of the
> Allied Army to diligently carry out their Zionist-Jewish war agenda.
> Ike openly stated, "God, how I hate Germans". And he even had a German
> name.
>
> Meanwhile one the most brilliant officers in American history, Douglas
> MacArthur, was shunted off to Southeast Asia with scant manpower and
> supplies. (MacArthur had the highest standing in West Point history and
> was an outstanding commander in World War I, becoming Chief of Staff.)
> He was a tactical genius. Despite the shortages, MacArthur waged an
> astonishing military campaign against the Japanese. Over thirty
> Japanese soldiers were killed for every American soldier killed. In the
> Korean War his brilliant Inchon landing (against the advice of
> Washington) resulted in 40,000 North Korean killed against 500 American
> and routed the North Korean Army. But Churchill and Roosevelt wanted no
> part of MacArthur, he was too patriotic, too arrogant, too independent
> and too outspoken (like Patton). MacArthur might have revealed a secret
> Zionist-Jewish war like Patton did. World War II in Europe was a
> Zionist-Jewish war (like World War I) with hidden Zionist-Jewish
> political objectives, the total destruction of Germany, its government,
> its industry and its people, which caused the death of fifty million
> human beings. Zionism hates patriots; they have a prior loyalty for
> their own country and their own people.
>
> Eisenhower was predictably a mediocre commander. German generals said
> his tactics were Grade 101. His standing orders were to attack at all
> times on all fronts. His troops were not well trained, their effective
> rate of fire was only twenty percent of combat troop strength. In the
> hedge-rows of France, he urged his field commanders to push the troops
> to the point of "irresponsibility", indifferent to the casualties. A
> German general said he had never seen such a bloodbath and he had
> fought on the Russian front. Fortunately Allied resources
> overwhelmingly outnumbered German, three million troops to one million
> and 15,000 aircraft to 500. Montgomery ridiculed Eisenhower to his face
> and Patton despised him. In August 1944 when Patton circled around and
> surrounded half of the German Army (opening the door to Berlin), he was
> held up at Falaise for two weeks, allowing a large portion of the
> German Army to escape. Patton was held up several more times because
> Zionist-Jewish Washington and Eisenhower had unfulfilled political
> objectives and was not ready to end the war and the slaughter.
>
> At the Battle of the Bulge, Patton wanted to let the whole German Army
> through then cut them off and annihilate them, ending the war, but was
> overruled by Eisenhower. When the Bulge was contained Patton wanted to
> attack the the Bulge, at its base from both sides, cutting off the
> German Army which was exhausted and out of supplies and ending the war.
> But no, it was "attack at all times on all fronts" again, prolonging
> the battle, the war and the casualties. One report said Eisenhower
> caused more American deaths at this one month battle than MacArthur did
> in his entire three year campaign against a fierce and dedicated
> Japanese Army. (What if MacArthur had commanded the European Allied
> Army and Patton, the Army in Italy?) Tens of thousands of young
> Americans lived, thanks to MacArthur, and tens of thousands did not,
> thanks to Eisenhower.
>
> Eisenhower did not like Patton, Patton did not share his Zionist-Jewish
> phobia about Germans and he had slapped a Jew for cowardice in battle.
> Eisenhower used this to replace Patton as commander of the Italian
> Campaign with fellow Jew, "bonehead" Mark Clark. Clark had a penchant
> for attacking in the wrong place at the wrong time and could destroy an
> American division faster than the Germans. Now two Jews, from a
> minority of less than two percent of the American people and less than
> two percent of their combat armed forces, commanded the Allied war
> effort in Europe, proving this was a secret Zionist-Jewish war. The
> agents of Rothschild brought about World War II like they brought about
> World War I, the Russian Revolution and the French Revolution (the
> Jacobins). After the chaotic 19th century of continuous wars and
> revolutions, mankind prayed for a peaceful 20th century but as
> Rothschild's Protocols of the Elders of Zion predicted, "We will give
> them no peace".
>
> After the war, Eisenhower dismissed Patton for his lack of barbarism to
> the German people; Patton treated them as human beings instead of mass
> murdering them and destroying their factories as demanded by the ever
> hateful Eisenhower and the Zionist-Jews. Patton was actually condemned
> by the Zionist-Jews and their media monopoly for this. To their
> delight; however, Eisenhower demonstrated the same fanatical Zionist
> hatred we see in Palestine every day and at Waco but on a much, much
> larger scale.
>
> Eisenhower took millions of German prisoners and murdered 1.5 million
> of them in peacetime (more than he had killed in wartime). German
> prisoners were herded into vast enclosures surrounded by barbed wire
> fences. Eisenhower, acting under Baruch/Morganthau instructions,
> ordered them starved to death and tortured by vast stores of food
> outside their fences. Any German bringing them food was to be shot. One
> woman and her children brought a bottle of wine for her prisoner
> husband; the American guard smashed the bottle on the ground and shot
> the husband five times killing him in front of his family. Village
> women were bayoneted for the same "crime". A humanitarian American
> soldier was told by his captain that he would be shot if he gave any
> more food to the prisoners. It was all kept from the American people by
> the Zionist-Jewish media and masked by the lucrative Zionist-Jewish
> Shoah Show. Was Patton going to "spill the beans"?
>
> In American history Andersonville of Civil War infamy is condemned for
> imprisoning 50,000 Northern troops during the war without adequate
> food, water, shelter, sanitation, medical care, causing extensive
> exposure, disease and death. Like at Zionist-Jewish Nuremburg, the
> commander, Henry Wirtz, was hung. A horrific movie of this human
> outrage was made recently by Hollywood. But Eisenhower did exactly the
> same thing to millions of German soldiers in peacetime. Will
> Zionist-Jewish Hollywood make a movie of Andernach? Or will it be more
> Shoahs and Shindler Lists? Their latest movie about Pearl Harbor
> perpetuates their myth of the "surprise attack" and Einsteins the
> perfidious Franklin Roosevelt who provoked the attack in order to bring
> a reluctant America into the Zionist-Jewish war in Europe. Moose Jaw
> was one of many Zionist controlled presidents going back to Woodrow
> Wilson and World War I.
>
> Ironically, Zionism falls on its own sword; it relies on false logic
> and double standards to its advantage. For example, if all generations
> of Germans are demonized and held accountable for Nazism because it
> originated in Germany, even though only one third of the German people
> ever voted for Hitler and millions disavowed Nazism but were
> intimidated by their government (remember Zionist-Jews financed
> Hitler),should all generations of Americans be demonized and held
> accountable for the mass murder of the Middle East today by their
> Neocon-Zionist-Jewish government? Should all Jews be demonized and held
> accountable for both Zionism and Communism because these political
> movements originated in the European Jewish community and Jews have
> been historically at the heart of both. And, if Zionist-Jews were the
> cause of both World Wars I and II then it follows that Mel Gibson is
> correct, wars are caused by Jews. (Instead of collecting hundreds of
> billions under the Shoah Show, their wealth should be confiscated for
> reparations.) The logic is inescapable. But there is a danger of
> persecution. Because Zionist-Jews cause war doesn't mean that all Jews
> are responsible (this would be anti-semitic). Actually, Zionist
> accusations of "anti-semitism" in political matters are absurd (think
> about it). The obvious difficulty is mixing religion with politics. No
> ordinary Jew, no more than the ordinary German, the ordinary American
> or the ordinary Moslem, can cause war. Moreover, whether voluntary or
> involuntary, goy Zionists greatly outnumber Zionist-Jews. (The
> Washington Senate is more Zionist than the Knesset.) War is the scourge
> of mankind and is entirely unnecessary and immensely wasteful of global
> resources; it despoils the environment for our children. It's sole
> cause and purpose is described in the Zionist Bible, The Protocols to
> the Members of the Elders of Zion. Mankind should be living in the
> Golden Age of Technology; instead is living in the Dark Ages of War and
> Chaos.
>
> The true cause of war is the Rothschild Dynasty and its control of all
> money through its hidden network of colossal wealth and power,
> exercised primarily through its global banking system and its prominent
> agents like Brandeis, Baruch, Untermeyer, Roosevelt, Churchill,
> Morganthau, Morgan, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Eisenhower and the
> Neocon-Zionist-Jews of today. (A Rothschild mother is quoted on the
> internet, "There will be no war if my sons want it.") If mankind wants
> to do away with war, the answer lies in the tax laws and the global
> banking system and its control of money. It is an entirely artificial
> structure constructed by Mayer Rothschild over two centuries ago.
> Wasn't Wolfowitz munificently rewarded for his cowardly
> Neocon-Zionist-Jewish war crime in Iraq? This is how the Dynasty works?
> And all opposition will be annihilated.
>
> The problem in the world today is the preponderance a tiny minority of
> Zionist-Jews in key positions throughout American government, its
> branches, agencies and subdivisions. In the 1980's Barry Goldwater
> warned that the ADL, when it wished, controlled half of the American
> Senate. Today AIPAC boasts it is almost 100%. It required all
> candidates for Congress to secretly pledge, in advance of elections,
> their loyalty to Israel, or else. While it is accused of treason, for
> God's sake. What colossal chutzpah! Representative government should
> represent all minorities in accordance with their numbers in the
> society. This tiny minority through its secret networks (the banking
> system) controls the Washington government, the mass media, both
> political parties, entire industries, commerce, money, finance,
> education, the arts as well as a majority of the nation's wealth.
> Zionism has silenced our military and forced it to engage in a series
> of disastrous wars, humiliating and bankrupting the American people.
> The own US absolutely and will do anything repeat ANYTHING to maintain
> their dictatorship. Despite the cover-up by Zionist Washington and the
> Zionist-Jewish media, the Myth of September Eleven has also collapsed.
> It was demolished not by explosives but by the same colossal chutzpah.
> Zionist chutzpah and hatred overwhelms its intelligence. What awful
> catastrophe will they perpetrate next to retain their power over
> America?
>
> Was Kennedy warning about Zionism when he said "For we are opposed,
> around the world, by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies
> primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; in
> infiltration instead of invasion; on subversion instead of elections,
> on intimidation instead of free choice; on guerrillas by night instead
> of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and
> material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly
> efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence,
> economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are
> concealed not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its
> dissenters are silenced, not praised; no expenditure is questioned, no
> rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the cold war, in
> short, with a wartime discipline no democracy would ever hope to wish
> to match."? Or was it Communism? Remember, the Protocols boast that
> Karl Marx and Communism was sponsored by Rothschild. Or was JFK just
> another "conspiracy nut"? He died for it! Robert, too!
> www.rense.com/general53/fjk.htm
>
> Was Woodrow Wilson also, "Some of the biggest men in the United
> States…are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere so
> organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so
> pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they
> speak in condemnation of it."? This could only be the Rothschild
> Dynasty and its international "agentur".
>
> Thanks to true history on the internet, I now say, "God, how I hate
> Eisenhower" and all the Zionists who rule US today with their hidden
> networks and their Protocol agenda of endless wars and humanicide. The
> greatest haters of all time now seek "Hate Laws", punishable in Israel,
> for criticizing Zionism and to eliminate free speech and discourse and
> imprison US once again in the Zionist-Jewish information cocoon. In our
> revolutionary days, The Founding Fathers similarly were threatened with
> being drawn and quartered in England for criticizing the Crown. Is
> Rothschild the King of America? The very last thing Zionism seeks for
> mankind is their oft repeated "Freedom and Democracy".
>
> Americans can take out their rage on the Zionist-Jewish media monopoly
> (television, national newspapers, magazines, books) and the
> Zionist-Jewish Hollywood. Remember Pearl Harbor! IMPEACH ZIONISM!
>
> * "Einsteins" means the deification of a Zionist-Jewish hero by the
> Zionist-Jewish media monopoly to render them beyond question or doubt.
>
> Also see:
>
> In 'Eisenhower's Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard's Story
> www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=135
>
> Allied War Crimes 1941-1950
> www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=136
>
> Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans
> www.rense.com/general46/germ.htm
>
> Ike's Open Field German Camps 'Stretched For 10 Kilometers'
> www.rense.com/general48/ikes.htm
>
>
>
>
> Printer friendly version
> Email this article to a friend
>
>
> Last updated 09/12/2006
> Homepage
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________
>
>
> Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
> -- Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK THE FRAUD

The Federal Reserve Fraud
and the
"Invisible Government"

"No State shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts."
Article 1, Section 10, united States' Constitution

In 1913 when the Federal Reserve Act was fraudulently pushed through Congress, Congressman Charles Lindbergh stated: "This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth....When the President signs this Act, the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized....The new law will create inflation whenever the trust wants inflation....From now on, depression will be scientifically created."
IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK REALLY "FEDERAL"?
Most people assume that the Federal Reserve Bank is federal--that is, part of the united States' government. However, the Ninth Circuit Court put that issue to rest in 1982 when they adjudicated:
"Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA, but are independent, privately-owned and locally controlled corporations." [Lewis vs. U.S., 680 F. 2d 1239, 1241]
"We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies; domestic swindlers, rich and predatory money lenders which prey upon the people of the united States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. The Federal Reserve Banks are the agents of the foreign central banks. The truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States by the arrogant credit monopoly which operates the Federal Reserve Board." [Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking & Currency Committee, speech on the floor of the House of Representatives, June 10, 1932]
"In the united States we have, in effect, two governments....We have the duly constituted Government....Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution." [Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking & Currency Committee, speech on the House floor, 1967]
"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders....The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and....manipulates the credit of the united States." [Senator Barry Goldwater]
"Federal Reserve Notes are illegal" [US Representative Dr. Ron Paul]
IF THIS IS TRUE WHY HAVEN'T I HEARD ABOUT THIS?
Basically, it is because the international bankers, having unlimited funds, own and control the mainstream media. "These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government." [Teddy Roosevelt]
We also have to ask ourselves why we were not taught the truth about the Federal Reserve in school. Click on the following video link to hear the testimony of Norman Dodd, head of the congressional committee that investigated the Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford foundations and their intent to control education:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7529890059122668728&q=hidden+agenda+norman+dodd
HOW DOES THIS AFFECT ME?
Congress initially defined a lawful money "dollar" as being and consisting of (at least) 371.25 grains of pure silver. Before 1965 anyone could exchange one paper dollar for one real silver dollar. However, in 1965 the united States' mint stopped minting silver dollars. When this occurred inflation began to skyrocket. Now it takes a whole fist full of paper dollars (i.e., "Federal Reserve Notes") to buy one real silver dollar. It now takes two working parents to support a family and the national debt is shooting over 12 trillion dollars! And this is not even counting the private debt by individuals and corporations, which is somewhere over 50 trillion dollars. Get the picture?
The paper and digital currency that bankers create out of thin air is backed by nothing. The more paper "dollars" they roll off the printing presses or digital "dollars" created by computers, the less each one is worth. Therefore, it takes more of 'em to buy the things we need, so the price of everything has to go up and up and up in endless inflation. Unfortunately, wages for most people will not increase fast enough to stay ahead of the game. But not to worry, the international banksters have created plastic "credit cards" to help you out (heh, heh, heh). Of course, they don't bother to tell us that they do not create enough paper/digital currency to pay off the debt plus interest so mathematically the economy will eventually collapse as has always occurred in history with paper currencies.
HOW DID ALL OF THIS GET STARTED?
Briefly, the Federal Reserve system was created by international banking families such as the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Rockefellers. This international banking cartel creates "money" out of thin air. It only costs them a few cents to print each Federal Reserve Note "dollar bill", and then they "bill" the American people for the full face value of the note. Then to add insult to injury, they charge us interest to borrow their so-called "money". If you or I did this, we would be arrested for counterfeiting and fraud. This system was instituted gradually, starting with the Civil War and culminating with the fraudulent passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
The passage of the Federal Reserve Act was unconstitutional because 1) the US Constitution prohibited "bills of credit" (i.e., paper notes) and 2) the US Constitution would have to be amended to go off the silver and gold coin standard for money. The US Constitution, the supreme Law of the Land, can only be amended pursuant to Article V. The US Constitution cannot be amended by statute. These unlawful actions by a criminal Congress remind me of a quote by the honorable Alfred E. Neuman of Mad Magazine fame: "America is that land which fought for freedom and then passed laws to get rid of it."
The Federal Reserve is also a monopoly--in a country where monopolies are supposed to be illegal. The IRS deposits people's income tax checks directly in the Federal Reserve banks--not in the united States Treasury. Therefore, the IRS, an unconstitutional entity, is merely the collection agency for the international banksters. Over the years the IRS has become a tool of the elite banking families to financially attack and/or imprison people who expose the Federal Reserve. It is also a tool used by the D.C. elite to attack people who expose government corruption.

If you take out a paper dollar and look at it, you will notice that it states at the top of the "bill": "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE". A "note" is, by definition, an "instrument of debt" and "evidence of debt". According to BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (Sixth Ed.) "MONEY" is defined: "In usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating medium of exchange, and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal or real estate." Now this may come as a shock to some people, but those paper "Federal Reserve Notes" are not money and they are not dollars. Federal Reserve Notes are merely IOUs. There is nothing backing these "bills" except debt. However, people (voluntarily) use them as [instead of] money and as dollars. The key word is "as". (The smallest words can have the biggest meanings.)
Banks can create this phony "currency" out of thin air. Banks can loan out "currency" that they don't even have. When you apply for a loan from a bank, the bank does not have anything to back up that loan because they are allowed to loan out about seven to ten times more "currency" than they have on deposit. This is not mere speculation; this is a matter of court record, testimony under Oath, by a former lawyer for the Federal Reserve. In other words bankers create "currency" with just the stroke of a pen or the keystroke of a computer. These bankers then charge you "interest" to borrow this "currency", which is nothing more than some numbers typed on a piece of paper! If We the People ever did this we would be spending many years in a federal prison. Unfortunately, they do not print enough currency to pay the interest so more pseudo-dollars must be borrowed to pay off the interest, resulting in a unpayable, ever-increasing debt.
This fraudulent "currency" system benefits not only bankers, but lawyers as well. As I have demonstrated in Whitman County, Washington, lawyers (members of the Bar Association) serve the Federal Reserve international banksters, not We the People. The documentation that I have thus far accumulated reveals that Bar Association prosecutors and judges, and even the Attorney General and Governor (also Bar Association members), are co-conspirators with bankers to unlawfully attack and imprison people for bringing up the REAL MONEY issue. The evidence clearly indicates that there is a nationwide criminal conspiracy of bankers and lawyers to overthrow the united States of America. CLICK HERE to learn more about this criminal conspiracy.
REAL MONEY IS GOLD & SILVER COIN
Article I, Section 10 of the united States' Constitution states: "No State shall...make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts." The united States' Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and this Law has never been amended.
Article I, Section 8 states: "The Congress shall have Power...to coin Money". Notice that it states "coin" not "print". Anyone who reads James Madison's notes of the Constitutional Convention, The Federalist Papers, etc. will find that one of the purposes of the Constitutional Convention was to do away with paper money--entirely! Thus for the first 72 years from the founding of our nation the united States' Government only minted gold and silver COINS for money.
"It is apparent from the whole context of the Constitution as well as the history of the times which gave birth to it, that it was the purpose of the Convention to establish a currency consisting of the precious metals. These were adopted by a permanent rule excluding the use of a perishable medium of exchange, such as of certain agricultural commodities recognized by the statutes of some States as tender for debts, or the still more pernicious expedient of paper currency." [President Andrew Jackson, 8th Annual Message to Congress, December 5, 1836]
"The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution. I am an enemy to all banks, discounting bills or notes for anything but coin. If the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." [Thomas Jefferson]
The nightmare that Thomas Jefferson predicted became painfully real during the Great Depression when the international banksters caused the foreclosure of untold numbers of homes, farms and businesses. As the national debt moves exponentially upwards, it appears that we are heading for another economic upheaval. CLICK HERE for an update on the economy.
MARK OF THE BEAST OR RELIGIOUS MANIPULATION?
Anyone can obtain an official letter from the Social Security Administration stating that the IRS has jurisdiction over the Social Security Administration. The IRS is merely a corporation used to turn over the labor and possessions of Americans to the international bankers who own the Federal Reserve. The corporation known as the Social Security Administration is not even based in Washington, DC. It is based in Baltimore, Maryland and it does not even have government franking privileges.
Currently, in the United States you cannot get a job, bank account, insurance, driver's license, hunting or fishing license without a Social Security Number. In other words, you cannot make a living, travel, buy or sell without this number. Chapter 13 of Revelations states that the Mark of the Beast is a number without which one cannot buy or sell. Is this the "mark of the beast" or religious manipulation on the part of the powers that be?
During the Constitutional Convention the delegates used the words "emit bills of credit" to refer to the issuance of paper (debt-based) currency. The framers of the Constitution were so adamant about prohibiting the printing of paper currency that one of the delegates, George Reed of Delaware, exclaimed that if they put the words "emit bills of credit" in the Constitution it would be "as alarming as the mark of the beast in Revelation!"
CLICK HERE for more information on this subject in the article entitled "Mark of the Beast by the American Bar Association?"
WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT IT?
1. GET EDUCATED: The first thing anyone can do and should do is to educate oneself on the subject. The book ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS is a good place to start. Another source is A PLEA FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES by George Bancroft. Another highly-recommended book on the subject of the Federal Reserve is THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND by G. Edward Griffin.
2. There are some great videos that educate people about the Federal Reserve Fraud and the international bankers plan for a cashless society. Many people today would rather watch a movie than read a book. CLICK HERE for free video documentation of the Federal Reserve Fraud and other related subjects.
3. Start using US-minted coins as much as you can to buy goods and services because they are not part of the Federal Reserve system. Nickel-Copper coins are okay but gold and silver coins are much better. Remember what Andrew Williams, a spokesman for the Federal Reserve in Washington, D.C. said about Federal Reserve notes:
"There is no law that says goods and services must be paid for with Federal Reserve notes. Parties entering into a transaction can establish any medium of exchange that is agreed upon."
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell
The author of the above article was Lanny Messinger, the original webmaster for this website, who is now retired.
FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE NATION (PART ONE): The Federal Reserve Bailouts
FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE NATION (PART TWO): Is there Gold in Fort Knox?
FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE NATION (PART THREE): The Bilderberg Group

Click on the banner below for video information on the Federal Reserve and IRS:

{Please email the link to this page to as many people as you can. This article may be reproduced and distributed only under the conditions 1) that it be free of charge; 2) that it be reproduced in its entirety without any alterations whatsoever; and 3) that anyone wishing to post this article on a website must first obtain permission from Webmaster@HealthFreedom.info and 4) include a link to http://www.HealthFreedom.info. Thank you!}

[The SHFN Newsletter subscriber list is not sold or shared with anyone]
SHFN NEWSLETTER ARCHIVES

Health Info Freedom Info Chemtrail Info Essiac Info AIDS Info Cancer Info About SHFN Contact Us Ordering Information B

WHAT IS ISRAHELL ?

ISTT | Israel’s List of Broken World Records | AR EN
Israel, a country the size of New Jersey can lay claim to the following achievements:
Trillions of the 'goy' taxpayers' dollars and counting!


• Israel was established upon the ruins of another nation that it destroyed; Palestine
• Israel holds the world record in the number of towns & villages it ethnically cleansed…500+
• Israel holds the world record in the number of refugees it deported…4 million +
• Israel holds the world record in the number of homes it demolished…60 thousand +
• Israel is the country with the highest record of UN condemnation… 500+ times
• Israel is the country with the highest number of protective US Security council vetoes…100+ times
• Israel has killed more innocent civilians per capita than any other country…50 thousand+
• Israel has imprisoned more civilians per capita than any other country…250 thousand+
• Israel has rendered more innocent civilians handicapped per capita than any other country…50 thousand+
• Israel has injured more innocent civilians per capita than any other country…200 thousand+
• Israel has only two countries to defend its policies in the United Nations. These countries are America & Micronesia. The population for Micronesia as of June 2008 is only 108000
• Israel is the only country on Earth that denies the right of return of refugees
• Israel is the only country on Earth that still occupies a whole other country & parts of two other countries
• Israel is the only country on Earth that publicly steals the water of its neighbours
• Israel is the only country on Earth that has legalized home demolishing as a method of collective punishment
• Israel is the only country on Earth that uproots trees as a method of collective punishment
• Israel is the only country on Earth that deliberately targets civilian infrastructure and justifies it
• Israel is the only country on Earth that legalized assassination
• Israel stands unique in using human shields in military operations
• Amongst all countries, Israel is the only one that has legalized torture
• Israel is the only country on Earth that builds illegal settlements in occupied lands
• Israel is the only country on Earth that publicly jails activists without trial
• According to the Guinness Book of World Records, Israel has created the highest number of checkpoints
• According to the Guinness Book of World Records, Israel holds the world record in the number of curfew its installed on the Palestinians
• Israel is the only country on Earth whose checkpoints deny women access to hospitals, they give birth alone and babies usually die
• Israel is exceptional in being the only country on Earth whose checkpoints denies patients access to hospitals, and they end up dying
• Israel is the only country on Earth whose checkpoints are where wedding parades come to an end
• Israel is the only country on Earth who checkpoints school children, denies them access to school, and puts an end to their classes
• Israel is one of two countries that, against International Law, use cluster bombs and depleted uranium bombs. America is the other…what a surprise huh?
• Israel holds the world record in the number of soldiers refusing to serve in the army
• Israel despite being a rich country, receives the highest financial aid, more than the sum aid to all sub-Saharan Africa!
• Israel claims its enemies want to wipe it off the map, but it has indeed wiped a whole country called Palestine off the map!
• Israel is the county that has introduced nuclear weapons into the Middle East. But the only country in the Middle East that refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty
• After East Germany, Israel is the only country that is building a segregation wall
• Second to South Africa, Israel is the only country to establish an apartheid regime
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first iron gates on roads
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first cities turned into jails with gates and opening hours
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first apartheid walls
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first electrified segregation fences
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first ‘eyes specific’ rubber bullets
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first abortion efficient, infant killing tear gas
• Israeli engineers developed the worlds’ first humiliation guaranteed human cages
• Israel is the only country on Earth that has a political party that publicly advocates ethnic cleansing of native citizens (Palestinians)
• Israel is the only country on Earth that has racist laws that officially discriminate against its native citizens (Palestinians)
• Israel is the only country on Earth known to have a memorial dedicated to a terrorist where his followers gather and dance [In fact, it's terrorists - plural - many more than one.]
• Israel is the only country on Earth that imprisons kids for political reasons
• Israel is the only country on Earth where you get a one month community service for intentionally, smashing the head of a child! How much more proof do people need to see that Israel is a terrorist nation?????! !!!!!!!!!
• Israel is the only country on Earth that does not hold its soldiers accountable for shooting peace activists in cold blood
• No other country on Earth has towns and cities allocated exclusively for one ethnic group. [No Arabs!]
• The only country on Earth, where people live in homes stolen from living refugees is, Israel
• The only place on Earth where people cultivate fields stolen from living refugees is, Israel
• Israel has the highest number of towns built upon ethnically cleansed villages, whose former residents are living refugees
• Israel ranks amongst the top countries badly lacking security


the Universe is laying out the perpetrators neatly at our feet:


Top 5 Billionaire Hedge Fund
Managers Are Zionists
4-12-10

These figures, published below, for the earning of the top five hedge fund managers are DISTURBING and DISGUSTING. We are witnessing a small self-appointed clique manipulating the world's assets and wealth for their own self enrichment. Between the masonic and Zionist control that encompasses the globe, especially in Britain and America, there is an evil and despicable greed devouring vast fortunes into the hands of the thieves masquerading as hedge fund managers, this while the rest of the world's population are being made homeless with billions living in abject poverty and destitution.

Total amounts earned in for 2009 -

1.David Tepper $4 Billion
2.George Soros $3.3 Billion
3.James Simons $2.5 Billion
4.John Paulson $2.4 billion
5.Steve Cohen $1.4 billion

THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY - THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION

This is Kaminski (a JEW) writing off the problem as being the talmud, and telling people that because they got too far away from their jew god they need to pray more and the talmud will go away. We are NOT all in this together. Kaminski is a kike, and he is in this on the other team, so fuck him. He puts a lot of weight on judaism and the talmud, but not the jew PARASITE itself. This is a very crafty ruse, but it doesn't escape me in the slightest. Tell that kike to eat shit and die.

These jews are only good for one thing. That does NOT include using them as sources of information regarding other jews, like Kaminski here. The only good use for them is to lubricate the blades of a wood chipper for the next jew to be run through.


-Adam
http://www.subvertednation.net

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] RE: Kaminski: ... in a single day
From: "Coffinman"
Date: Tue, December 08, 2009 6:02 pm
To: "'World Changer'" ,
, "'Nico Haupt'" ,
"'Rosalee Grable'" ,
, ,
, , "'GP'"
, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , "'suppressed 911
evidence'" ,
, ,
, , "'John Kaminski'"
, , ,
"'phishna'" , "'Mike'" ,
, "'Riktor Ranvik'" ,
"'Edgar J. Steele'" , "'Commander Z'"
, "'Counter Bias'"
, "'Patrick Grimm'"
, "'Patty Blackwell'" ,
"'Randy Atkins'" , "'Len Cranford'"
, "'Polydoros Polydoropoulos'"
, "'Dionysio Spiliotopoulos'"
, "'Siegfried Tischler'"
, "'General K. Konstantinidis'" ,
"'NELLIE FINLEY'" , "'pyrigenes'"
, , "'white pride'"
, "'Ioannis M. Roussos'"
, "'O Paramythas'" ,
, , "'Davina'"
, , ,
, ,
, "'phillip adams'" ,
, , "'Subverted
Nation'"


Excellent essay, if a bit optimistic.

-----Original Message-----
From: World Changer [mailto:anakahamon@ritternet.com]
Sent: 09 December 2009 00:35
To: cherifasirry@yahoo.com; Nico Haupt; Rosalee Grable; painfulquestions@aol.com; bollyn@bollynbooks.com; feedback@bollyn.com; Coffinman@ntlworld.com; jewishracism@yahoo.com; GP; ueritemarg@gmail.com; leonardjp@earthlink.net; eyeswideoopen@yahoo.com; bronathanael@yahoo.com; Shensingoumi19@aol.com; wingedpiper@yahoo.com; blamming@yahoo.com; khanversemc@yahoo.com; flierflylilly@yahoo.com; sisyphus1285@cs.com; smith@iamthewitness.com; jwalter@walden3.org; ognir2@gmail.com; indylake@live.com; andrewcarringtonhitchcock@hotmail.com; econrn@suddenlink.net; olfriend@nwinfo.net; brayman1490@hotmail.com; totalinfo@gmail.com; votefraud@fuse.net; metazeph@gmail.com; killtown@yahoo.com; xxxcatholic@yahoo.com; geogpob-unforgiven@yahoo.com; hmakow@gmail.com; suppressed 911 evidence; vyzygoth@hotmail.com; webstertarpley@yahoo.com; annie@anniemachon.com; ruby23@adelphia.net; John Kaminski; JB_Campbell@yahoo.com; christopher@bollyn.com; phishna; Mike; Wes@illuminati-news.com; Riktor Ranvik; Edgar J. Steele; Commander Z; Counter Bias; Patrick Grimm; Patty Blackwell; Randy Atkins; Len Cranford; Polydoros Polydoropoulos; Dionysio Spiliotopoulos; Siegfried Tischler; General K. Konstantinidis; NELLIE FINLEY; pyrigenes; tm_metzger@yahoo.com; white pride; Ioannis M. Roussos; O Paramythas; achilles31@live.com; dmanfahy69@aol.com; 'Davina'; fixinmycredit@live.com; jrklopfer@cox.net; mrslider69@aol.com; nico-mandy@hotmail.co.uk; ny_giantsfan@msn.com; phillip adams; thule8881@yahoo.com; miraclehealer2003@yahoo.com; World Changer; Subverted Nation
Subject: Fw: Kaminski: ... in a single day





----- Original Message -----

From: skylax@comcast.net

To: World Changer ; World Changer ; Commander Z ; Coffinman

Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:04 PM

Subject: Kaminski: ... in a single day





The revolution

will be won

in a single day



BUT WHO WILL SAVE THE JEWS ONCE

THE WORLD LEARNS WHAT THEY’VE DONE?



pull quote:

Do you temper your remarks with politically correct (but tantalizing) rhetoric to let your listener know what you mean, but not the whole world around you? On TV, they say that’s what freedom is. Do you believe them?





By John Kaminski

skylax@comcast.net





The final revolution for human freedom will be won in a single day, not by bombs, famine, mass poisonings, or electronic vaporization, but by a few well chosen phrases uttered in exactly the right time and place, which will turn on a light that will illuminate the darkness of a beast that has afflicted us for more centuries than we can sensibly count.



It WILL occur in a single day, because the serpentine network of the beast engulfs the entire planet with its self-destructive blackmail avarice, and everyone everywhere will simultaneously realize that it is not the philosophy of profit that has turned our planet into a diseased cinder, but rather the policies of a certain collection of megalomaniacal fools who control every last dollar in the world, or damn near. It is they who are directly responsible for all this senseless mayhem and needless destruction, and it is us sheeple who are secondarily responsible for tolerating their evil mind control methods all these years.



We proles are only numbers in the ledger book of some rich Jewish crook tied into a worldwide network of shysters who strive to make us all half-dead zombies bound up in complex payment plans with no say in our fate.



All it will take to free us from this bizarre bonded indebtedness is to understand what Jews have done to the world over time, and how they are currently well advanced in their objective to either kill or enslave all the non-Jews of the world, thus fulfilling the commands of their secretive “holy book,” the Talmud — which is a psychological atrocity that has resulted in THEIR control over ALL the systems that control US.



Not to realize this is to guarantee your future as a mind-controlled slave, and quite likely, your impending and unnatural death.



What Jews have done to the world . . . what exactly have they done?



1. Social engineering of reality through editing of history.



From earliest times, the core criminals who later became known as Jews had the natural advantage of being itinerant merchants (caravansers), and their knowledge of multiple cultures imbued in them an experiential advantage over sedentary populations confined to one small town or country, who were, you might say, sitting ducks.



I’m genuinely sorry to tell many of you that the template for deception that has been followed all these years was the creation of Christianity in 325 AD, which taught everybody to turn the other cheek when the Hidden Hand reached into their pockets. It taught people to conceptualize their safety based upon a promise that could never be redeemed except in the manipulated imagination of the believer.



Belief in something that could not possibly be true is the same mental mechanism needed to believe that our current system of banking is an honest business.



The similarity of proposition, authority and trappings leads us to believe that somehow religion and banking are cut from the same cloth. The logic it takes to believe in some great god guiding all from above is the identical leap of faith it takes to borrow money at compound interest. Trust us on this one, they say. And because of the way we are built — fearful and finite organisms — we do.



The great sci-fi visionary H.G. Wells authored the thought that mankind’s mental and moral progress stopped in the 1770s. The name most associated with this sudden surcease in evolution would be Rothschild.



Control of money led to control of everything else, and the bastardization of every discipline known to man for the benefit of the host parasitic group, Mongol invaders known as Ashkenazi who deliberately chose to ally themselves with the worst of all possible brigands, the Sephardics, who together, shrewdly and patiently, plundered all the sitting ducks in the world.



Control of the media made possible all their scams. It is Rule 1.



David Rockefeller famously said it best:



“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”



Having the most money gave them the upper hand in business, and they in perpetuity captured all the valuable industries in the world: Rockefeller’s oil, Morgan’s railroads, Marx’s politics, Sassoon’s drugs to China, Monsanto’s slaves, Lehman’s carpetbagging, Freud’s psychology, Meyer’s Hollywood, Einstein’s physics, Irving Berlin’s music monopoly, Warburg’s Federal Reserve scam, Oppenheimer’s Jewish hell bomb, Betty Friedan’s housewives, Abbie Hoffman’s hippies, Bronfman’s booze, Henry Kissinger’s assassinations, Norman Lear’s sitcoms, Bill Gates’s computers . . . and so on.



Perhaps the Jews’ most heinous crimes are in the area of medicine. One cannot but remember that old Ottoman Empire proscription against Jews practicing medicine because it says in the Talmud that Jews should become doctors to enable them to kill goyim in a wider variety of ways. Can you say cancer treatment? Mercury fillings? Fluoride? Thimerosal? Squalene? Depleted uranium? Lead poisoning did Rome in. Chicago babies, too. The mad cow is due to come home soon.



John D. Rockefeller first sold oil as a medicinal elixir before he found out it could really burn. Jonas Salk was given a Nobel Prize for a vaccine that gave everyone polio, a fake disease that was really industrial lead poisoning which bought-off medical scientists concealed with fancy rhetoric.



Then there are more recent elixirs: Gardasil, which has already destroyed future generations of Americans; Prozac, the fast track to zombieland; Morgellon’s disease, they say, comes from the chemtrails and puts little wriggly nanobots twitching through your deteriorating veins. Count on these all being Jewish inventions. If conventionally trained, count on your doctor prescribing things that will kill you.



2. The Jews’ harvest



Have you lost a loved one in a war? Cindy Sheehan did, and after years of crying in public, she choked on the American flag. The newspapers regarded her as an abnormal crank — imagine that, a mother whose son was murdered for no honest reason, being called abnormal, when all she was trying to do was to point out the lie each and every one of us reading this has let rip the soul right out of all our hearts, as we cringe with uncertain confusion in this ugly soup of manufactured realities.



The famous Berlin professor Werner Zombart uttered the immortal truism: “Wars are the Jews’ harvest.”



Most notable in our worldwide indictment of Jewish crimes against humanity are the needless deaths caused by covert usurpation of, at this point, virtually every government in the world. The best place to see this in all its historical vividity is in Capt. Ramsay’s “The Nameless War,” on my website and also for years, I have recently learned, on the quality websites of Daryl Bradford Smith and Jackie Patru .



In Ramsay you see in one glance the Jewish penetration of England (Cromwell), France (Rothschild’s renegade puppet Napoleon), Russia (New York Jews who changed their names and became the Politburo), Germany (Nuremberg verdicts were a hoax, just like the lynching of Saddam Hussein), and lastly, and most thoroughly, the United States (Roosevelt and his right hand man Nelson Rockefeller).



Talking about wars, we’re talking about the Federal Reserve, the very shadow government that has bilked us out of our hard earned money for more than a century while protected by the well-coached puppets who pose as presidents whom the bankers themselves have chosen to lead us. And how have they accomplished this?



By taking subversive control of all our media — from schools to movies to TV to computer options — every possible avenue of human endeavor is saturated by this pornographizing influence that is decidedly Jewish. The distinguishing feature of all successful Hollywood actors is that the finest non-Jewish actors must be utterly debased in a depraved way before they get their Oscars.



As Bugsy Siegel’s Las Vegas Jewish architecture became the norm for development in the United States in the 1940s, so nihilistic dissatisfaction became the fashionable ethic toward the 1960s, and revolutionary activities sprung from U.S. college campuses, fueled by an array of CIA distributed drugs.



The Jewish destabilization template so successful in England, France, Russia, Germany and most of the other countries in the world has, at this point, AD 2009, just about rattled the entire world into crumbling pieces by making money the centerpiece of everyone’s focus, causing all other areas of human thought to become polluted and diminished by greed.



The poet Robert Lowell once wrote that nothing good could ever be written if it was written for money. And yet today, practically everything is written for that very purpose, which is an instructive insight into the reason for the consistently poor quality of contemporary communication.



The important thing to know is the death toll caused by the Bolshevik Revolution, which in Stalin’s later days was controlled by Nelson Rockefeller, who was also Franklin Roosevelt’s top adviser. Sixty-six million non-Jews were killed by a Soviet state funded by New York Jewish bankers. That is important American history for you.



Jewish TV took apart Sen. Joseph McCarthy when the Wisconsin senator, fueled by Eustace Mullins’ research which had been commissioned by the imprisoned poet Ezra Pound, named Communists bent on subverting the Constitution.



Both Mullins and Pound, however, failed to fully perceive the power of the Jewish moneymedia monster. Though Pound was imprisoned for 13 years and Mullins’ books were burned in Germany, the great mistake everyone made was not realizing that the word Communist was an exact synonym for Jewish. And while we were involved in all these Whitewater-type brouhahas, they created the state of Israel.



But we didn’t hear it. We couldn’t. The white noise media blare was simply too powerful. Destabilization trends proffered by Kerouac and the pervert poet Ginsberg lured adolescents into Jewish-manipulated nihilism. The highest image it seems the Jews want to cultivate is to call pissing on a crucifix an art form. That seems to be the bellwether image they wish to imbue on the mind of the goy.



Frankly, I consider that repugnant act as the highest expression of their so-called religion, Judaism, and I sorely wish the world would wake up and see what it really means. It really means that they’re pissing on themselves, and don’t realize it.



But they’re definitely pissing on us, and we must stop them — now!



3. Provable pathology



Every crime is committed by someone who did not receive love at the proper time and place.



We all need to stop being whores and zealots for one philosophy or another and realize we are all in this together, except for that one group of congenital onanists who urinate on crucifixes.



That’s like pissing on hope. It’s a form of nihilism guaranteed to destroy the practititioner of it, and all around him. This is precisely what is infecting our world.



The core philosophy espousing this is the Talmud (and also by extension, The Old Testament). What ill-begotten god could have uttered that it was OK to kill others, rape their women, and take their property because they were acting in his holy name. What kind of twisted adolescent sociopathic bullshit is that?



The words of a psychopath, is what. The god of the Old Testament, for now and forevermore, is mentally ill, and the Talmud is the diabolically perfect illustration of how that perverted pathology will destroy us, if we let it.



It’s not OK to say you’re better than everyone else because your G-d says so. That is known as deviant behavior, as defined by Jewish psychiatric authorities. It is a superiority complex, born out of fear and lack of love.



The basic mistake of monotheistic religions is that you can’t get love by force, and that’s what they’ve done, by coercion and social engineering. The Jews just twisted it to inculcate into the minds of the feckless bovines that the actual Messiah was Israel, the Jewish people, the outlaw caravansers, the bandits from across the river.



Jews worship thieves. And this is what we have let our world become.



Are you a thief? Do you go along to get along?



Do you temper your remarks with politically correct (but tantalizing) rhetoric to let your listener know what you mean, but not the whole world around you? On TV, they say that’s what freedom is. Do you believe them?



The revolution will be won in a single day because the world will finally wake up and see that doing the right thing is far more important to our survival than doing the profitable thing.



Any religion that can’t admit it has profaned the true nature of God over time is not worthy of being called His emissary, for in our imperfect natures, misunderstanding the grander design is inevitable until we finally understand, stop worrying, and get on with the work of life.



One thing’s for certain: when everybody finds out what the Jews have done to the world, the world will treat the Jews far more kindly than the Jews have treated the world, and in this way, with severe protections, they will lovingly be allowed to rejoin the human race and share in its glorious future.



It’s always wrong to shatter the beliefs of people who believe the best thing in life is love. Let them alone; they’ve worked it out; they’ll be OK.



The reason the guy wrote “Thou Shalt Not Steal” is because what really matters in this life is how much your neighbor likes and respects you. Without him, you’re nothing.



This is how the revolution will be won in a single day. For many of you, that day is today, and one day soon, everyone will realize it, all at once.



John Kaminski is a writer of lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, who once wrote, “Never fear what you may not avoid.” http://johnkaminski.info/ Please support independent, unbought journalists: 250 N. McCall Rd. #2, Englewood FL 34223





#










__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4671 (20091208) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4671 (20091208) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
The Jewish Role
in the Bolshevik "Revolution"
and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism

by Mark Weber
In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia's last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.

Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.

In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.

Radzinsky's research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky - one of Lenin's closest colleagues - had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote:
My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in passing: "Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?"

"Finished," he replied. "He has been shot."

"And where is the family?"

"The family along with him."

"All of them?," I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.

"All of them," replied Sverdlov. "What about it?" He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.

"And who made the decision?," I asked.

"We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult circumstances."

I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs - originally published in 1920, and recently reissued by the Institute for Historical Review - is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of "White" (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia's imperial family.

A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?

In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country. But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame "the Jews" for so much misfortune?

A Taboo Subject
Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country's total population, they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary and - as chairman of the Central Executive Committee - head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.

Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.

A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. "An intelligent Russian," he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."
Critical Meetings
In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.

Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.

To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev). Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet - whose chairman was Trotsky - established an 18-member "Military Revolutionary Committee" to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews. Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man "Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).
Contemporary Voices of Warning
Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston hurchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality." The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek - all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a few months later: "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

"The Bolshevik Revolution," declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920, "was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct."

As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment. Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that "because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel."
Historians' Views
Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins

Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution - partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.

The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka," wrote Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, "stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator." In Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents," reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history. (Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)

In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin's execution order.

Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.

In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were "amazingly" numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:
This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.
In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:
The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
In the struggle for power that followed Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders - including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.

Put To Death Without Trial
For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing "Nicholas Romanov" before a "Revolutionary Tribunal" that would publicize his "crimes against the people" before sentencing him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England's Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France's Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.

In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial, during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death - along with his family and staff - in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.

Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton's view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.

For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:
The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or total doom This Lenin sensed well.
Historical Context
In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia's subversive leftist parties. Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally conser-vative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the "Pale of Settlement."

However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews." She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition." In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.
If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame "the Jews" for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame "white people" for Negro slavery, or "the Germans" for the Second World War or "the olocaust."
Words of Grim Portent
Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:
Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie - more blood, as much as possible.
Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: "We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated."
'The Twenty Million'
As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be much higher than Zinoviev's murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.

Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that "from 1929 to 1952 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died."

Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: "From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp." These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.

Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet "repression" of it own people:
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933 famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the Russians now refer to as 'The Twenty Million'."
A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.
The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new and more respectful look at their country's pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets - along with many in the West - have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire's citizens were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with remarkable leniency.

During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled. Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.

Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.
Monarchist Sentiment
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.

People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours' wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor: "I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It's like a nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his family." Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many cities.

A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a despicable crime. Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent "Orthodox Church Abroad" canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. "The people loved Emperor Nicholas," he said. "His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy."

On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.

Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation's official emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures - such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky - have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors Empress Catherine I.
Symbolic Meaning
In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:
The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.
Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.

The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.
The Massacre's Place in History
The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe's leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent's reigning monarchs were related by blood. England's King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin of Nicholas.

More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.
Notes
1. Edvard Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 327, 344-346.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
2. From an April 1935 entry in "Trotsky's Diary in Exile." Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), pp. 770, 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.; E. Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 325-326.; Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 349-350.
3. On Wilton and his career in Russia, see: Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 141-142, 144-146, 151-152, 159, 162, 169, and, Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File on the Tsar (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 102-104, 176.
4. AP dispatch from Moscow, Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a 1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics of Belarus (White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish region in Russian Siberia. "Survey Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet Lands," Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.
5. At the turn of the century, Jews made up 4.2 percent of the population of the Russian Empire. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 55 (fn.). By comparison, in the United States today, Jews make up less than three percent of the total population (according to the most authoritative estimates).
6. See individual entries in: H. Shukman, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution (Oxford: 1988), and in: G. Wigoder, ed., Dictionary of Jewish Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991). The prominent Jewish role in Russia's pre-1914 revolutionary underground, and in the early Soviet regime, is likewise confirmed in: Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism (New York: Oxford, 1982), pp. 92-94. In 1918, the Bolshevik Party's Central Committee had 15 members. German scholar Herman Fehst - citing published Soviet records - reported in his useful 1934 study that of six of these 15 were Jews. Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 68-72.; Robert Wilton, though, reported that in 1918 the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin and three were of Russian ancestry. R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (IHR, 1993), p. 185.
7. After years of official suppression, this fact was acknowledged in 1991 in the Moscow weekly Ogonyok. See: Jewish Chronicle (London), July 16, 1991.; See also: Letter by L. Horwitz in The New York Times, Aug. 5, 1992, which cites information from the Russian journal "Native Land Archives."; "Lenin's Lineage?"'Jewish,' Claims Moscow News," Forward (New York City), Feb. 28, 1992, pp. 1, 3.; M. Checinski, Jerusalem Post (weekly international edition), Jan. 26, 1991, p. 9.
8. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), p. 352.
9. Harrison E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (Doubleday, 1978), p. 475.; William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 291-292.; Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 42-43.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 318-319. This meeting was held on October 10 (old style, Julian calendar), and on October 23 (new style). The six Jews who took part were: Uritsky, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov and Soklonikov. The Bolsheviks seized power in Petersburg on October 25 (old style) - hence the reference to the "Great October Revolution" - which is November 7 (new style).
10. William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (1987), vol. 1, p. 292.; H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 475.
11. W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 1, pp. 274, 299, 302, 306.; Alan Moorehead, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1965), pp. 235, 238, 242, 243, 245.; H. Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum (Berlin: 1934), pp. 44, 45.
12. H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 479-480.; Dmitri Volkogonov, Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), pp. 27-28, 32.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 319-320.
13. "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people," Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Facsimile reprint in: William Grimstad, The Six Million Reconsidered (1979), p. 124. (At the time this essay was published, hurchill was serving as minister of war and air.)
14. David R. Francis, Russia from the American Embassy (New York: 1921), p. 214.
15. Foreign Relations of the United States - 1918 - Russia, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: 1931), pp. 678-679.
16. American Hebrew (New York), Sept. 1920. Quoted in: Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, Mass.: 1963), p. 268.
17. C. Jacobson, "Jews in the USSR" in: American Review on the Soviet Union, August 1945, p. 52.; Avtandil Rukhadze, Jews in the USSR: Figures, Facts, Comment (Moscow: Novosti, 1978), pp. 10-11.
18. T. Emmons and B. M. Patenaude, eds., War, Revolution and Peace in Russia: The Passages of Frank Golder, 1913-1927 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1992), pp. 320, 139, 317.
19. Louis Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: Free Press, 1990), pp. 30, 31, 37. See also pp. 43, 44, 45, 49, 50.
20. Quoted in: Salo Baron, The Russian Jews Under Tsars and Soviets (New York: 1976), pp. 170, 392 (n. 4).
21. The Atlantic, Sept. 1991, p. 14.; In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. By order, the Cheka took few Jewish hostages. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 824.; Israeli historian Louis Rapoport also confirms the dominant role played by Jews in the Soviet secret police throughout the 1920s and 1930s. L. Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: 1990), pp. 30-31, 43-45, 49-50.
22. E. Radzinsky, The Last Tsar (1992), pp. 244, 303-304.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.; See also: W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 2, p. 90.
23. Quoted in: The New Republic, Feb. 5, 1990, pp. 30 ff.; Because of the alleged anti-Semitism of Russophobia, in July 1992 Shafarevich was asked by the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC) to resign as an associate member of that prestigious body.
24. R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), p. 148.
25. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.
26. An article in a 1907 issue of the respected American journal National Geographic reported on the revolutionary situation brewing in Russia in the years before the First World War: " The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund " W. E. Curtis, "The Revolution in Russia," The National Geographic Magazine, May 1907, pp. 313-314. Piotr Stolypin, probably imperial Russia's greatest statesman, was murdered in 1911 by a Jewish assassin. In 1907, Jews made up about ten percent of Bolshevik party membership. In the Menshevik party, another faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, the Jewish proportion was twice as high. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 365.; See also: R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), pp. 185-186.
27. Martin Gilbert, Atlas of Jewish History (1977), pp. 71, 74.; In spite of the restrictive "Pale" policy, in 1897 about 315,000 Jews were living outside the Pale, most of them illegally. In 1900 more than 20,000 were living in the capital of St. Petersburg, and another 9,000 in Moscow.
28. Sonja Margolina, Das Ende der Lügen: Russland und die Juden im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: 1992). Quoted in: "Ein ganz heisses Eisen angefasst," Deutsche National-Zeitung (Munich), July 21, 1992, p. 12.
29. Krasnaia Gazetta ("Red Gazette"), September 1, 1918. Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 820, 912 (n. 88).
30. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 820.
31. Contrary to what a number of western historians have for years suggested, Soviet terror and the Gulag camp system did not begin with Stalin. At the end of 1920, Soviet Russia already had 84 concentration camps with approximately 50,000 prisoners. By October 1923 the number had increased to 315 camps with 70,000 inmates. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 836.
32. Cited by historian Robert Conquest in a review/ article in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
33. The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
34. Review/article by Robert Conquest in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.; In the "Great Terror" years of 1937-1938 alone, Conquest has calculated, approximately one million were shot by the Soviet secret police, and another two million perished in Soviet camps. R. Conquest, The Great Terror (New York: Oxford, 1990), pp. 485-486.; Conquest has estimated that 13.5 to 14 million people perished in the collectivization ("dekulakization") campaign and forced famine of 1929-1933. R. Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (New York: Oxford, 1986), pp. 301-307.
35. Russian professor Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue of the Moscow weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as many as 50 million people were killed, condemned to camps from which they never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal "dekulakization" campaign against the peasantry. "Soviets admit Stalin killed 50 million," The Sunday Times, London, April 17, 1988.; R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently calculated that 61.9 million people were systematically killed by the Soviet Communist regime from 1917 to 1987. R. J. Rummel, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (Transaction, 1990).
36. Because of his revolutionary activities, Lenin was sentenced in 1897 to three years exile in Siberia. During this period of "punishment," he got married, wrote some 30 works, made extensive use of a well-stocked local library, subscribed to numerous foreign periodicals, kept up a voluminous correspondence with supporters across Europe, and enjoyed numerous sport hunting and ice skating excursions, while all the time receiving a state stipend. See: Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 42-57.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 55-75.
37. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 187-188.;
38. The Nation, June 24, 1991, p. 838.
39. Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
40. "Nostalgic for Nicholas, Russians Honor Their Last Czar," Los Angeles Times, July 18, 1993.; "Ceremony marks Russian czar's death," Orange County Register, July 17, 1993.
41. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.
________________________________________
Appendix
A striking feature of Mr. Wilton's examination of the tumultuous 1917-1919 period in Russia is his frank treatment of the critically important Jewish role in establishing the Bolshevik regime.
The following lists of persons in the Bolshevik Party and Soviet administration during this period, which Wilton compiled on the basis of official reports and original documents, underscore the crucial Jewish role in these bodies. These lists first appeared in the rare French edition of Wilton's book, published in Paris in 1921 under the title Les Derniers Jours des Romanoffs. They did not appear in either the American or British editions of The Last Days of the Romanors published in 1920.
"I have done all in my power to act as an impartial chronicler," Wilton wrote in his foreword to Les Derniers Jours des Romanoffs. "In order not to leave myself open to any accusation of prejudice, I am giving the list of the members of the [Bolshevik Party' s] Central Committee, of the Extraordinary Commission [Cheka or secret police], and of the Council of Commissars functioning at the time of the assassination of the Imperial family.
"The 62 members of the [Central] Committee were composed of five Russians, one Ukrainian, six Letts [Latvians], two Germans, one Czech, two Armenians, three Georgians, one Karaim [Karaite] (a Jewish sect), and 41 Jews.
"The Extraordinary Commission [Cheka or Vecheka] of Moscow was composed of 36 members, including one German, one Pole, one Armenian, two Russians, eight Latvians, and 23 Jews.
"The Council of the People's Commissars [the Soviet .government] numbered two Armenians, three Russians, and 17 Jews.
"Ac.cording to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik state, including the above-mentioned, in 1918-1919 there were: 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Letts [Latvians], 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns, one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews."
"If the reader is astonished to find the Jewish hand everywhere in the affair of the assassination of the Russian Imperial family, he must bear in mind the formidable numerical preponderance of Jews in the Soviet administration," Wilton went on to write.
Effective governmental power, Wilton continued (on pages 136-138 of the same edition) is in the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party. In 1918, he reported, this body had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin, and three were of Russian ancestry. The nine Jews were: Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinoviev), Lurie (Larine), Uritsky, Volodarski, Rosenfeld (Kamenev), Smidovich, Sverdlov (Yankel), and Nakhamkes (Steklov). The three Russians were: Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko, and Lunacharsky.
"The other Russian Socialist parties are similar in composition," Wilton went on. "Their Central Committees are made up as follows:"
Mensheviks (Social Democrats): Eleven members, all of whom are Jewish.
Communists of the People: Six members, of whom five are Jews and one is a Russian.
Social Revolutionaries (Right Wing): Fifteen members, of whom 13 are Jews and two are Russians (Kerenski, who may be of Jewish origin, and Tchaikovski).
Social Revolutionaries (Left Wing): Twelve members, of whom ten are Jews and two are Russians.
Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow: Five members, of whom four are Jews and one is a Russian.
Polish Communist Party: Twelve members, all of whom are Jews, including Sobelson (Radek), Krokhenal (Zagonski), and Schwartz (Goltz).
"These parties," commented Wilton, "in appearance opposed to the Bolsheviks, play the Bolsheviks' game on the sly, more or less, by preventing the Russians from pulling themselves together. Out of 61 individuals at the head of these parties, there are six Russians and 55 Jews. No matter what may be the name adopted, a revolutionary government will be Jewish."
[Although the Bolsheviks permitted these leftist political groups to operate for a time under close supervision and narrow limits, even these pitiful remnants of organized opposition were thoroughly eliminated by the end of the 1921 .]
The Soviet government, or "Council of People's Commissars' (also known as the "Sovnarkom") was made up of the following, Wilton reported:
Peoples Commissariat (Ministry) Name Nationality
Chairman V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs G.V. Chicherin Russian
Nationalities J. Dzhugashvili [Stalin] Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larin) Jew
Food Supply A.G. Schlikhter Jew
Army and Navy [Military] L.D. Bronstein (Trotski) Jew
State Control K.I. Lander Jew
State Lands Kaufmann Jew
Works [Labor] V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lilina (Knigissen) Jew
Education A. Lunacharsky Russian
Religion Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum [Radomyslski] (Zinoviev) Jew
.Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance I. E. Gukovs [and G. Sokolnikov] Jew
Press Voldarski [Goldstein] Jew
Elections M.S. Uritsky Jew
Justice I.Z. Shteinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees Savitch (Assistant) Jew
Refugees Zaslovski (Assistant) Jew
Out of these 22 "Sovnarkom" members, Wilton summed'up, there were three Russians, one Georgian, one Armenian, and 17 Jews.
The Central Executive Committee, Wilton continues, was made up of the following members:
Y. M. Sverdlov [Solomon] (Chairman) Jew
Avanesov (Secretary) Armenian
Bruno Latvian
Breslau Latvian [?]
Babtchinski Jew
N. I. Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzberg [Ganzburg ] Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
S. Dimanshtein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
A. A. Ioffe Jew
Karkhline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeld (Kamenev) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) Jew
N. Krylenko Russian
Krassikov Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Latvian
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lunacharsky Russian
Peterson Latvian
Peters Latvian
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Latvian
Nakhamkes (Steklov) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
L. Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew [?]
Terian Armenian
Uritsky Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Fromkin Jew
Souriupa Ukrainian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian [?]
Karakhane Karaim [Karaite]
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Schlichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine-(Pravdine) Jew
Thus, concluded Wilton, out of 61 members, five were Russians, six were Latvians, one was a German, two were Armenians, one was a Czech, one was an Imeretian, two were Georgians, one was a Karaim, one. was a Ukrainian, and 41 were Jews.
The Extraordinary Commission of Moscow (Cheka) 'the Soviet secret police and predecessor of the GPU, the NKVD and the KGB was made up of the following:
F. Dzerzhinsky (Chairman) Pole
Y. Peters (Deputy Chairman) Latvian
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jew
Karlson Latvian
Schaumann Latvian
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Galperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Katzis Latvian
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Latvian
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlov (Brother of president of the Central Executive Committee) Jew
Biesenski Jew
J. Blumkin (Count Mirbach's assassin) Jew
Alexandrovitch (Blumkin's accomplice) Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Latvian
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Latvian
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Latvian
Of these 36 Cheka officials, one was a Pole, one a German, one an Armenian, two were Russians, eight were Latvians, and 23 were Jews.

"Accordingly," Wilton sums up, "there is no reason to be surprised at the preponderant role of Jews in the assassination of the Imperial family. It is rather the opposite that would have been surprising."
________________________________________
This article is taken from he Journal of Historical Review (Institute For Historical Review ), PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. Subscriptions to the Journal are $40 per year (6 issues)
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
• Back to Radio Islam´s English Index Page
• To Radio Islam´s Pages in Other Languages
________________________________________
RADIO ISLAM SEARCH PAGE
________________________________________
Radio Islam, E-mail: radioislam@hotmail.com
________________________________________

Ahmed Rami, founder of the radio station: RADIO ISLAM