Spain off the Cliff - that word; Depression

----- Original Message -----

From: Len Cranford

To: Dr. R.M. Finley ; craig schommer ; ryder smith ; hkparks@hctc.com ; nilnoc@hotmail.com ; Marshall R. Ellington ; jb_campbell@yahoo.com ; phishna ; patrick.henry.wanted@gmail.com ; Les Visible ; James Wickstrom ; Robin Stenovich ; Jimbo

Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:47 PM

Subject: Spain off the Cliff - that word; Depression





{When unemployment goes above 24% you no longer can avoid that word; "Depression". And just like Denninger described; "Austerity" on the Socialism shrinks that "Main St. Economy" that no one considered mattered. Now comes the big dive in Real Estate. L.}





http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=47926



22 Signs That The Collapsing Spanish Economy Is Heading Into A Great Depression

The Bolsheviks are here . . .

--------- Forwarded message ----------




From: P. V. S.

Date: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:17 AM

Subject: CISPA - Internet Spy Bill Exposed

To:







The Bolsheviks are here . . .



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wdp3-3Lmlrs

AUSTRALIA AND MUSLIMS...............That's what we say Having Guts .. (Balls).

-----Original Message-----

From: Eurymaxos Seretis

To: undisclosed-recipients:;

Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 7:46 am

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Πρθ: Fwd: FW: AUSTRALIA AND MUSLIMS











AUSTRALIA AND MUSLIMS...............That's what we say Having Guts .. (Balls).



W O W ! She Did It Again!!!

Australia says NO -- Second Time she has done this!





She sure isn't backing down on her hard line stance and one has to appreciate her belief in the rights of her native countrymen.



A breath of fresh air to see someone lead. Australian Prime Minister does it again!!



The whole world needs a leader like this!



tr



Prime Minister Julia Gillard - Australia



Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.



Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote: 'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT... Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.'



'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.'



'We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!'



'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.'



'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.'



'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.'



'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'



NOTE: IF we circulate this amongst ourselves in UK , Canada & USA , WE will find the courage to start speaking and voicing the same truths.



If you agree please SEND THIS ON and ON, to as many people as you know...

No virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4935 - Release Date: 04/13/12

Which Countries Have Nuclear Weapons?

THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE NOT WEAPONS, SINCE THEY MASSIVELY AND PERMANTLY DESTROY THE LIFE AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
ACCORDING WITH THE OLD CONCEPT OF KLAUSEVITS  , "THE WAR IS THE CONTINUATION OF POLITICS WITH DIFFERENT MEANS".
HOWEVER, THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS DO NOT PERMIT THE CONTINUATION OF POLITICS AFTER THEIR USE, SINCE THEY MAKE SUCH  A GENERAL CATASTROPHE OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENT THAT CANNOT BE RESTORED AFTER THEIR DROP.
SO ,   AS LOGICAL HUMAN BEINGS WE HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO STRUGLE AGAINST THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS UNTIL  FULL  DESTRUCTION  ALL OF THEM, CLOSING THE NUCLEAR BASES AND STOP THE PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR  MATERIAL.

AMPHIKTYON



Thursday, April 26, 2012

SEE IT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzaxRm9CkPE





Which Countries Have Nuclear Weapons?

Nuclear Wea[pons? Weapons? Weapons?

The American News Media are very deceptive. The way they choose to convey news reveals bias and distortion. See this very brief video on the subject of Nuclear Weapons from a more objective perspective.

Click on the title and see for yourself.

KALI YUGA REPORT 120428 -CITIZENS OF THE WOLD STAND UP GREECE!!

PROVIDING INFORMATION NOT FOUND IN THE ZIONIST CONTROLLED MEDIA,


MONITORING THE AGE OF DARKNESS, IGNORANCE, GREED AND STUPIDITY

& THE ZIONIST WARS FOR GLOBAL DOMINANCE.

SETTING STRAIGHT THE RECORD OF HISTORY.





KALI YUGA REPORT 120428





1 - TRIALS WITHOUT CRIMES OR EVIDENCE - Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

2 - "SYRIAN OPPOSITION": Mossad, Blackwater, CIA Led Operations in Homs. Weapons from Israel - Israa Al-Fass

3 - Natalie Portman Shills For The Zionist War Machine And Spews Lies On Syria : Jew Hollywood’s Power In Action - Jonathan Azaziah +

AL QAEDA IN SYRIA

4 - April Memories : Deir Yassin Remembered

5 - The Prisoners In Gaza : Their Blackout Nightmare - Ralph Nader

6 - Where the 'Self' Ends and the 'West' Begins - Gilad Atzmon +

UN Criticizes Israel for Legalizing Settlements +

Israel's Iron Man : 'Stupid and Mean and Brutal' - Uri Avnery

7 - Settlers Raise Israel’s Flag On Top Of Ibrahimi Mosque - Saed Bannoura +

Why Palestinian prisoners are on hunger strike +

Jewish settlers attack Palestinian village, block Nablus road +

Israel Censors Bob Simon’s Report on Palestinian Christians +

The right to water : Palestinian water cistern demolitions by zionist settlers in Hebron area

8 - The Holocaust, Sacred Ground and Obama’s Selective View of the Struggle for Human Dignity - Nima Shirazi

9 - Washington Felons Fret Over Hanky-Panky in Cartagena - Philip Giraldi





10 - Latest Message from Israel’s Nuclear Whistle Blower to Obama, Peres and SECURITY - Eileen Fleming

11 - Slavery by Consent -The UNITED STATES CORPORATION

12 - The Duty of the Military in a Militarized Empire - Sartre Batr

13 - The Exodus of Christians out of the Holy Land & Other Videos

14 - Press TV Banned, the New Democracy

15 - Kosovo Massacre Fraud by Former German Minister Scharping Revealed : Germans caught with pants down over Kosovo: Rudolf Scharping +

Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Map of the Battle Over Dominance in Europe - Pyotr ISKENDEROV

16 - Why The US Needs a Major War

17 - CIA & MOSSAD KILL US TROOPS +

Mossad/CIA murdered U.S. troops in Iraq - POPEYE +

Sick strategies for senseless slaughter : The cat is out of the bag now - John Kaminski

18 - George Soros’s and the Neo-Cons’ Control of Washington’s Propaganda Program - Wayne MADSEN +

World War III Has Begun – It`s the First Asymmetric War Long Awaited by Pentagon Think Tanks





19 - A String of Political Assassinations and the US Military Presence +

Philippines, U.S. stage war games in face of China warning

20 - 'Humanitarian' Base of the US Southern Command in Chaco Province of Argentina : Sleeping with the Enemy - Carlos Pereyra MELE +

Ecuador Coup Attempt Engineered by the CIA - Nil NIKANDROV

21 - Breaking News and Commentary from Citizens For Legitimate Government

22 - Rothschilds Planned to Make Britain Communist - T. Stokes

23 - Christians of the Holy Land - Ben White

24 - THE JEWISH SIEGE OF EUROPE + GEORGE ORWELL’S ZIONIST NIGHTMARE - Brother Nathanael Kapner

25 - Orthodox Jew Abuse Suspects Get Exemption, Agudath Israel Opposes Brooklyn Prosecutors' Refusal to Identify - Paul Berger

26 - TEXE MARRS : Why the Jewish Rabbis Love the Mormon Church

27 - Taxpayers Forced To Bailout Zionist Gangsters, The Financial Crisis On Wall Street &, The Gang of Zionists Behind 9-11 - Christopher Bollyn





28 - Edwin Wright - Zionist Jews Worked 'To Capture, The U.S. Government'

29 - Israel - A History Of Hate Crimes - Reverend Ted Pike

30 - The Jewish Gangsters in America - Gad Nahshon

31 - The 'God' That Serves Elite Jews - Henry Makow PhD,

32 - The 'Holocaust' Versus The Holodomor

33 - Total Figures for German Slaves After World War II

34 - During Hard Times Should You Know Some Basic Gardening Skills -Robert Wayne Atkins

35 - SIX Kinds of Pills Big Pharma Tries to Get You Hooked on for Life - Martha Rosenberg

36 - The food industry is waging war on your cells with these 10 toxic ingredients - S. D. Wells





All articles are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and are for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. The material presented underneath does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editor. Then : everybody should do research of his own and check for deception or some 'agenda'. As always it is : 'Caveat Lector'!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------









ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND





"The propaganda system allows the U.S. Leadership to commit crimes without limit and with no suggestion of misbehavior or criminality.

In fact, major war criminals like Henry Kissinger appear regularly on TV to comment on the crimes of the derivative butchers."- Edward S. Herman









“History is the lie commonly agreed upon.” – Voltaire







“The falsification of history has done more to mislead humans than any single thing known to mankind.” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau









"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic." - James Dresden.





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------









1 - TRIALS WITHOUT CRIMES OR EVIDENCE





By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts







paulcraigroberts.com





Andy Worthington is a superb reporter who has specialized in providing the facts of the US government’s illegal abuse of “detainees,” against whom no evidence exists. ( http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/ ) In an effort to create evidence, the US government has illegally resorted to torture. Torture produces false confessions, plea bargains, and false testimony against others in order to escape further torture.



For these reasons, in Anglo-American law self-incrimination secured through torture has been impermissible evidence for centuries. So also has been secret evidence withheld from the accused and his attorney. Secret evidence cannot be confronted. Secret evidence is distrusted as made-up in order to convict the innocent. The evidence is secret because it cannot stand the light of day.



The US government relies on secret evidence in its cases against alleged terrorists, claiming that national security would be threatened if the evidence were revealed. This is abject nonsense. It is an absurd claim that presenting evidence against a terrorist jeopardizes the national security of the United States.



To the contrary, not presenting evidence jeopardizes the security of each and every one of us. Once the government can convict defendants on the basis of secret evidence, even the concept of a fair trial will disappear. Fair trials are already history, but the concept lingers.



Secret evidence murders the concept of a fair trial. It murders justice and the rule of law. Secret evidence means anyone can be convicted of anything. As in Kafka’s The Trial, people will cease to know the crimes for which they are being tried and convicted.



This extraordinary development in Anglo-American law, a development demanded by the unaccountable Bush/Obama Regime, has not resulted in impeachment proceedings; nor has it caused an uproar from Congress, the federal courts, the presstitute media, law schools, constitutional scholars, and bar associations.



Having bought the government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory, Americans just want someone to pay. They don’t care who as long as someone pays. To accommodate this desire, the government has produced some “high value detainees” with Arab or Muslim names. But instead of bringing these alleged malefactors to trial and presenting evidence against them, the government has kept them in torture dungeons for years trying to create through the application of pain and psychological breakdown guilt by self-incrimination in order to create a case against them.



The government has been unsuccessful and has nothing that it can bring to a real court. So the Bush/Obama Regime created and recreated “military tribunals” to lend “national security” credence to the absolute need that non-existent evidence be kept secret.



Andy Worthington in his numerous reports does a good job in providing the history of the detainees and their treatment. He deserves our commendation and support. But what I want to do is to ask some questions, not of Worthington, but about the idea that the US is under terrorist threat.



By this September, 9/11 will be eleven years ago. Yet despite the War on Terror, the loss of Americans’ privacy and civil liberties, an expenditure of trillions of dollars on numerous wars, violations of US and international laws against torture, and so forth, no one has been held accountable. Neither the perpetrators nor those whom the perpetrators outwitted, assuming that they are different people, have been held accountable. Going on 11 years and no trials of villains or chastisement of negligent public officials. This is remarkable.



The government’s account of 9/11 implies massive failure of all US security and intelligence agencies along with those of our NATO puppets and Israel’s Mossad. The government’s official line also implies the failure of the National Security Council, NORAD and the US Air Force, Air Traffic Control, Airport Security four times in one hour on the same morning. It implies the failure of the President, the Vice President, the National Security Adviser, the Secretary of Defense.



Many on the left and also libertarians find this apparent failure of the centralized and oppressive government so hopeful that they cling to the official “government failure” explanation of 9/11. However, such massive failure is simply unbelievable. How in the world could the US have survived the cold war with the Soviets if the US government were so totally incompetent?



If we attribute superhero powers to the 19 alleged hijackers, powers in excess of V’s in V for Vendetta or James Bond’s or Captain Marvel’s, and assume that these young terrorists, primarily Saudi Arabians, outwitted Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Tony Blair, along with the CIA, FBI, MI5 and MI6, Mossad, etc., one would have expected for the President, Congress, and the media to call for heads to roll. No more humiliating affront has ever been suffered by a major power than the US suffered on 9/11. Yet, absolutely no one, not even some lowly traffic controller, was scapegoated and held accountable for what is considered to be the most extraordinarily successful terrorist attack in human history, an attack so successful that it implies total negligence across the totality of the US government and that of all its allies.



This just doesn’t smell right. Total failure and no accountability. The most expensively funded security apparatus the world has ever known defeated by a handful of Saudi Arabians. How can anyone in the CIA, FBI, NSA, NORAD, and National Security Council hold up their heads? What a disgraced bunch of jerks and incompetents. What do we need them for?



Consider the alleged hijackers. Despite allegedly being caught off guard by the 9/11 attacks, the FBI was soon able to identify the 19 hijackers despite the fact that apparently none of the alleged hijackers’ names are on the passenger lists of the airliners that they allegedly hijacked.



How did 19 passengers get on airplanes in the US without being on the passenger lists?



I do not personally know if the alleged hijackers were on the four airliners. Moreover, defenders of the official 9/11 story claim that the passenger lists released to the public were “victims lists,” not passenger lists, because the names of the hijackers were withheld and only released some four years later after 9/11 researchers had had years in which to confuse victims lists with passenger lists. This seems an odd explanation. Why encourage public misinformation for years by withholding the passenger lists and issuing victims lists in their place? It cannot have been to keep the hijackers’ names a secret as the FBI released a list of the hijackers several days after 9/11. Even more puzzling, if the hijackers’ names were on the airline passenger lists, why did it take the FBI several days to confirm the names and numbers of hijackers?



Researchers have found contradictions in the FBI’s accounts of the passenger lists with the FBI adding and subtracting names from its various lists and some names being misspelled, indicating possibly that the FBI doesn’t really know who the person is. The authenticity of the passenger lists that were finally released in 2005 is contested, and the list apparently was not presented as evidence by the FBI in the Moussaoui trial in 2006. David Ray Griffin has extensively researched the 9/11 story. In one of his books, 9/11 Ten Years Later, Griffin writes: “Although the FBI claimed that it had received flight manifests from the airlines by the morning of 9/11, the ‘manifests’ that appeared in 2005 had names that were not known to the FBI until a day or more after 9/11. These 2005 ‘manifests,’ therefore, could not have been the original manifests for the four 9/11 flights.”



The airlines themselves have not been forthcoming. We are left with the mystery of why simple and straightforward evidence, such as a list of passengers, was withheld for years and mired in secrecy and controversy.



We have the additional problem that the BBC and subsequently other news organizations established that 6 or 7 of the alleged hijackers on the FBI’s list are alive and well and have never been part of any terrorist plot.



These points are not even a beginning of the voluminous reasons that the government’s 9/11 story looks very thin.



But the American public, being throughly plugged into the Matrix, are not suspicious of the government’s thin story. Instead, they are suspicious of the facts and of those experts who are suspicious of the government’s story. Architects, engineers, scientists, first responders, pilots, and former public officials who raise objections to the official story are written off as conspiracy theorists. Why does an ignorant American public think it knows more than experts? Why do Americans believe a government that told them the intentional lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction despite the fact that the weapons inspectors reported to President Bush that Hussein had no such weapons? And now we see the same thing all over again with the alleged, but non-existent, Iranian nukes.



As Frantz Fanon wrote, the power of cognitive dissonance is extreme. It keeps people comfortable and safe from threatening information. Most Americans find the government’s lies preferable to the truth. They don’t want to be unplugged from the Matrix. The truth is too uncomfortable for emotionally and mentally weak Americans.



Worthington focuses on the harm being done to detainees. They have been abused for much of their lives. Their innocence or guilt cannot be established because the evidence is compromised by torture, self-incrimination, and coerced testimony against others. They stand convicted by the government’s accusation alone. These are real wrongs, and Worthington is correct to emphasize them.



In contrast, my focus is on the harm to America, on the harm to truth and truth’s power, on the harm to the rule of law and accountability to the people of the government and its agencies, on the harm to the moral fabric of the US government and to liberty in the United States.



As the adage goes, a fish rots from the head. As the government rots, so does the United States of America.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------











2 - "SYRIAN OPPOSITION": Mossad, Blackwater, CIA Led Operations in Homs. Weapons from Israel





By Israa Al-Fass



Global Research, April 26, 2012

almanar.com.lb - 2012-03-03



This report and testimony from early March points to the presence of foreign forces on Syrian soil, operating within the ranks of "opposition" forces.









“The crisis is at its end” is no longer a relieving statement made by some political analysts, as the crisis is really close to its end. Baba Amro is now under the control of the Syrian army… and so are the armed groups of which a big number escaped to the Lebanese borders dubbing their retreat “tactical”.



Around 700 Arab and Western gunmen surrendered in Baba Amro, well-informed sources told Al-Manar website, adding that “huge and critical surprises will be uncovered in the coming few days… such as the kinds of arms seized, as well as the military tactics the armed groups followed, and the sides that supervised the operations.”



The sources further assured to the news website that the security operation in Homs will be over in a maximum of five to eight days.



Weapons from Israel used for First Time in Baba Amro



For his part, Syrian expert in strategic affairs Salim Harba pointed out that Baba Amro neighborhood and the areas surrounding it were emptied from the armed groups’ organizational as well as command structures with minimum army and civilian casualties, as the area was mainly concentrated by gunmen.



Speaking to Al-Manar website, Harba said that “the captured gunmen held Arab nationalities, including Gulf, Iraqi, and Lebanese… among them were also Qatari intelligence agents and non-Arab fighters from Afghanistan, Turkey, and some European countries like France.



“The Syrian army also uncovered tunnels and equipments there,” he added, pointing out that “advanced Israeli, European, and American arms that have not yet been tested in the countries of manufacture, in addition to Israeli grenades, night binoculars, and communication systems were confiscated by the security forces.”



Harba went on saying that “communication stations where established on the Lebanese borders to oversee the military operations in Baba Amro, and to ensure contact between field commanders and a coordination office led by members of information in the Qatari capital Doha.”



He clarified that “the escape of British journalists from Homs through the Lebanese-Syrian borders was the result of this coordination.”



In parallel, the Syrian strategic expert revealed that “the communication stations were being operated by Lebanese figures; some of them were members of the Future parliamentary bloc,” and considered that “these figures worked on transforming Wadi Khaled region into a strategic depth for Baba Amro.”



Mossad, Blackwater Directed from Qatar Operations in Homs



Additionally, Salim Harba revealed to Al-Manar website that “a coordination office was established in Qatar under American-Gulf sponsorship. The office includes American, French, and Gulf –specifically from Qatar and Saudi Arabia- intelligence agents, as well as CIA, Mossad, and Blackwater agents and members of the Syrian Transitional Council.”



“Qatar has also made deals with Israeli and American companies to arm the armed groups, and Gulf countries have been financing the agreements,” he added.



The Syrian expert pointed out that “the significance of the security operation in Homs is due to the high expectations that regional and international sides had from the armed gangs in Baba Amro … they wanted Homs to be turned into a new Benghazi.”



Indicating that the operation was implemented with high professionalism and accuracy, Harba reassured that documents will be exposed at the right time.



“The authority will not reveal everything it has now… the Syrian security forces have documents and confessions that could harm everyone who conspired against Syria, and could make a security and political change, not just on the internal Syrian level, but also on the regional level,” he assured.



In the same context, Harba considered that all the conferences and meetings by what he referred to as the “enemies of Syria” were aimed at paving the way for an American initiative under a “humanitarian” title.



He concluded: “At the end, the US will submit to the Russian initiative after it realized that confrontations will only result in its defeat, and that the Syrian regime is still strong enough to deal with any conspiracy.”







-------------------------------------------------------------------------------















3 - Natalie Portman Shills For The Zionist War Machine & Spews Lies On Syria : Jew Hollywood’s Power In Action









by Jonathan Azaziah

The “humanitarian hawks of Hollywood” are at it again and this time their target is Syria. First it was CFR member, daughter of Nakba denier Jon Voight and Goodwill Ambassador to the United Nations Angelina Jolie declaring “some sort of intervention is absolutely necessary” because “we just must stop the civilians being slaughtered”, then it was UK best-selling singing sensation Joss Stone stating with vigor that “these stories have to be told” because if not, the “massacres will just get worse” (1), and now it is movie megastar Natalie Portman ranting about “President Bashar al-Assad’s ongoing brutal attack on the citizens of his own country” and posting a picture on Facebook with a note that says, “Unite For Syria. Stop One Year of Bloodshed.” Portman’s hysteria has been followed by singers Annie Lennox and Nelly Furtado, as well as legendary “liberal activist” actress, Susan Sarandon (2).





What separates Natalie Portman (real name: Natalie Hershlag) from the other “humanitarian hawks of Hollywood” is that she is an “Israeli”-born Jew with a strong Zionist identity, the daughter of an illegal settler from occupied al-Quds and is very much connected to the Jewish kinship networks of international Zionism. Syria of course, is a major adversary of the Jewish supremacist entity which has long sought to overthrow the Bashar al-Assad government and colonize Syrian land as part of “Greater Israel.”



A fluent speaker of Hebrew (3), Portman is very much attached to the usurping Jewish entity, once stating, “I really love the states, but my heart’s in Jerusalem. That’s where I feel at home.” And also, “Anytime anything happens to anyone there, it’s like a limb’s been ripped off. I’m very protective of Israel, obviously, but I’m more protective of humanity than of any of my own personal desires (4).” This, as it will be demonstrated by the evidence, is a blatant and purposeful falsehood; the only humans that Portman cares about are those of Jewish origin.



It is typical of the mentality of the Judaic supremacist to feel coziness on land that they, their parents and/or their ancestors criminally usurped from the indigenous people. And speaking of usurpation, the Zionist actress also studied for 6 months at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (5), an institution very much tied to the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people during the (ongoing) Nakba. From May 1948 to February 1949, Jewish National Library and Hebrew University Library officials entered the West al-Quds homes of Palestinians driven out or massacred by Zionist terrorist forces and stole 30,000 books, newspapers and manuscripts, half of the total number of written works stolen by the Jewish occupiers in the aftermath of Plan D (6). Assuredly, Portman, who went to the occupation school to “learn more about the situation there (7),” learned nothing of this terrible and tragical crime against humanity.





Natalie Portman

was the star of "Free Zone,"

an "Israeli" propaganda

film centered around the

disgraceful Zionist concept

of "Palestinian terrorism."

Nor would she want to know about it even if it was presented to her for Natalie Portman is a Zionist, through and through, lock, stock and barrel. She has starred in an “Israeli” propaganda film called “Free Zone”, centered around the ugly Jewish paradigmatic concept of “Palestinian terrorism” and has visited “Israeli victims” in Zionist occupation hospitals hurt by Palestinian Resistance responses to the Zionist entity’s aggression (8).True to her tribalism, when 1,000 actors, directors and academics raised their voices against the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival for being “complicit in the ‘Israeli’ propaganda machine” and slamming the usurping Zionist dragon as an “apartheid state,” Portman was right there to affirm her support for “Israel,” becoming a signatory to a counter-protest in defense of the Jewish “state (9).” She did say that she was very protective of the genocidal entity.



During her studies at Harvard, Portman displayed her “protectiveness” again by lashing out with absurdity at a fellow student who rightly condemned the Zionist regime for the crime of “apartheid,” as well as its egregious racism. Her warped argument is as follows, “This {the aforesaid student’s observation of Zionist apartheid} is a distortion of the fact that most Israelis and Palestinians are indistinguishable physically. The Israeli government itself is comprised of a great number of Sephardic Jews, many of whom originate from Arab countries (10).” Stunning would not be an accurate enough term for the level of massive stupidity that this represents. This shouldn’t be so surprising however, as Portman also staunchly believes the age-old, monstrously moronic Zionist myth that “Israel,” where she says her “insides refuse to abandon”, is the place “where deserts bloom (11).”



Someone should’ve told Portman then and someone should still tell her now that a similarity in physical characteristics is utterly and pathetically irrelevant. “Indistinguishable physicality” doesn’t change the fact that Zionist Jews have been illegally colonizing Palestine since 1881; that Zionist Jews have established at least 30 racist, discriminatory laws that deprive Palestinians of their basic human rights; that Zionist Jews have based the entireties of “Israeli culture” and “Israeli identity” on the theft of the traits from the indigenous Arab peoples that they colonized, mass murdered and usurped, from food to folklore and that while the Zionist regime practices apartheid, amongst other crimes, it is something far, far worse and far, far sinister (12).



Portman should also be reminded that the Arab Jews are not called “Sephardic” but “Mizrahi,” and that intra-Jewish racism against Mizrahim due to their Arabness is a regular staple of “Israeli” society, as most recently evidenced by high-profile Zionist rabbi Yehoshua Zuckerman declaring, “A Moroccan Jew can’t match Ashkenazi knowledge (13).”Mizrahim have faced “humiliating and sometimes horrifying discrimination” since the establishment of the Zionist entity, infamously getting sprayed with DDT on arrival because the Ashkenazi elite considered them dirty (14). Unfortunately, this historical racism has not deterred Mizrahim from participating in the criminal occupation or being any less brutal than their Ashkenazi brethren; they are as disgustingly supremacist as anyone else in the usurping entity. But like most Zionists, “facts” are of no matter to Natalie Portman, who would much rather wallow in the delusional Jewish romantic narrative known as Zionism.





Alan Dershowitz

is a Jewish supremacist,

one of the crudest

"Israel" apologists

in the United States

and the mentor of

Natalie Portman.

And if Portman actually believes that the Jewish invaders who raped Palestine “made the desert bloom,” someone should suggest that she give a thorough reading to “The Sacred Landscape: The Buried History Of The Holy Land Since 1948”, the book of former occupation mayor of “her city,” al-Quds, Meron Benvenisti, who describes in no certain terms what the Zionists actually did to the holy land,“Only a fraction of the olive groves were cared for and cultivated, whereas the vast majority were neglected. Tens of thousands ofdunams of olive trees were uprooted to make room for field crops. The {overall} destruction of hundreds of thousands of dunams of fruit-bearing trees does not fit Israel’s self image as a society that knows how to “make the desert bloom (15).” It is rare for a Zionist to spout or write words of truth, but that is exactly what Benvenisti does here.



It is at Harvard where Portman would first become a vital asset to the usurping Zionist entity’s global machinations. It is at Harvard, the prestigious educational powerhouse that gave a platform to genocidal “Israeli” WINEP warmonger and Shalem College President Martin Kramer, who opined that Palestinian births should be “curbed (16),” where Portman served as a research assistant to none other than Alan Dershowitz (17), one of the most vocal, visible and voluminously vile proponents of Zionism in America. Apart from being a hardline Zionist that thinks defending “Israel” is a “secular religion,” Dershowitz is also an arch Jewish supremacist who believes “fighting for Jewish survival against their enemies is a sacred mission” and who revels in the dominance of Jews in entertainment and media (18). The “research” Portman provided to Dershowitz was for his hasbara extravaganza, “The Case for Israel,” a work since beaten to a pulp and debunked by Norman Finkelstein in “Beyond Chutzpah” but nevertheless, still touted in Zionist circles.



V For Vendetta:

Blockbuster of

Zionist propaganda.



Portman would provide international Zionism with an even greater service when she starred in the 2005 dystopian “revolution” film, V For Vendetta, a Zionist thriller filled to the brim with psychological projections of Adolf Hitler, Nazism and the Holocaust® which has captivated a generation worth of would-be activists and patriots and brainwashed them into parrots of Jewish propaganda, whether they are aware of it or oblivious. The film has punctured holes in activist networks, opening them to subversive Jewish interests and allowed the Zionist Power Configuration to manipulate dissent and control discourse. And the fact that an “Israeli”-Jewish actress is playing the heroine of a film in which a “Nazi-like” totalitarian state is the villain is truly telling (19). When all of this “Israelcentrism” is taken into consideration vis–à–vis Syria, it can easily be deducted that Natalie Portman isn’t participating in these activities out of “humanitarianism” but commitment to the global Jewish-Zionist agenda.





Syria is caught in the

throes of a trap set by

the usurping Jewish entity

and its Zionist allies in America.

Syria And Sudan: Under Assault From The “Israel”-Hollywood Nexus



Since March 15th, 2011, the Syrian Arab Republic has been assaulted by a ruthless conspiracy of destabilization originally designed by the agents of the usurping Jewish entity and the morally bankrupt House of Saud in 2004. Using the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) as the chief proxy and assisted by the United States government, collaborationist Turkey, Zionist-run France and the atrocious Future Movement of ex-Lebanese Premier Sa’ad Hariri, the conspiracy has fomented civil war across Syria. The Ikhwan rebels have committed unspeakable crimes against humanity and their affiliates in the West, House Arabs always connected to Zionist organizations like the National Endowment for Democracy, keep the heinous propaganda flowing.“Israeli”-NATO war plans to overthrow Bashar al-Assad and replace it with a pro-“Israel”, pro-Saudi regime are already very much in place (20). The blood spilled already by this Zionist-Saudi counterrevolution is unconscionable.



The Syrian National Council, pseudo-government body of the Ikhwan rebels, a group of Zionist puppets and Saudi-backed thugs, is in contact with“Israeli” media and with the help of Turkey, is receiving $1 million from the ambitious and filthy GCC giant Qatar every 5 days (21).And if the situation wasn’t horrific enough, neoconservative Zionist warmongers Joseph Lieberman and John McCain just met with the Ikhwan rebels in a blatant display of international meddling in Syria’s affairs (22). The remarks of Natalie Portman and her Hollywood constituents are coming at a crucial time when the ante has been upped to gain international support for another all-out “Jewish war of survival”, one that is right around the corner and literally sitting and wobbling on the fence, waiting to be waged.







The "Save Darfur"

hoax: a project of

the American Jewish

community and the

criminal Zionist entity.

Syria is in the sights of Hollywood like the oil-rich North African nation of Sudan before it. Accusing the government of Sudan, led by President Omar al-Bashir, of committing genocide by massacring over 200,000 innocents in the western Sudanese region of Darfur, the “Save Darfur” coalition mobilized support and pushed for “conflict resolution.” Using ultra-celebrity George Clooney and a plethora of other high-profile actors to “sell” the agenda, Save Darfur “begun exclusively as an initiative of the American Jewish community,” with powerhouse Zionist havens like the Jewish Community Center in Manhattan, United Jewish Communities, UJA-Federation of New York, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the Jewish Community Relations Council, Yeshiva University and the American Jewish World Service aiding and abetting the dissemination of hasbara (23). And hasbara it absolutely was, as the “genocide” accusation and “200,000 innocents massacred” charge, which in certain neoconservative arenas had ballooned to as high as 300,000 dead, were both hideously false exaggerations based on zero evidence (24).



As reported by well-respected, Eritrea-based investigative journalist Thomas C. Mountain, in a critical report downplayed, ignored, denied and buried by varying elements of the octopus-like Zionist media, tens of millions of dollars from the $100 million (or higher) collected by the Save Darfur campaign wound up in “Israeli” banks to fund illegal Zionist settlements in the occupied West bank (25). This damning information confirmed that the Jewish organizations that birthed Save Darfur were not acting out of compassion for the Sudanese people but for the interests of the usurping Zionist regime.



It was this faux “humanitarianism” that provided perfect cover on the international stage while “Israel,” along with its marionettes in Uganda and Ethiopia, amplified the subversive Zionist warfare that had been waged on Sudan since the 1950s (26), and completed the goal of cracking the country in half, North Sudan and South Sudan, with the Zionist entity taking control of the natural resources in the latter (27). It is also vital to note that both Sudan and Syria, targets of the “humanitarian hawks of Hollywood,” are both prominently mentioned as candidates for Jewish balkanization in the landmark paper of “Israeli” foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon, “A Strategy For Israel In the 1980s (28).” This isn’t a coincidence by any stretch of the imagination.





This August 1996

issue of the Jewish

magazine "Moment"

says it all: "Jews Run

Hollywood! So what?!"

Zionism and Jewish Hollywood: A Dangerously (and Historically) Symbiotic Relationship



Given Natalie Portman’s origins and her past with a Zionist stalwart like Dershowitz, the fact that she would lend her voice to give credence to such significant foreign policy objectives of the usurping Zionist entity indeed shows that there is a Jewish connection which permeates academia, entertainments and politics from the United States to “Israel.” It is this global Jewish-Zionist network, which also includes the Jewish religious establishment, “Israeli” intelligence and a consolidated group of tribal billionaires that organized, promoted, executed and profited from the annihilation of Iraq (29), and it is this network, which Natalie Portman is very much a part of, that seeks the exact fate for Syria.



It can never be stated enough that Jews are in full control of Hollywood (30). Again, Jews are in full, as in complete, as in total, as in absolute control of Hollywood (31). Every major American film studio was founded by persons of Jewish extraction, and this Jewish monopoly over Hollywood (film and TV alike) has continued uninterrupted to this very day. These Jews are deeply attached to the usurping Zionist entity, and as a result, Hollywood has exclusively operated from an “Israelcentric” perspective from the very start, in which “Israeli” interests are promoted and Jews and “Israelis” are always good, always heroes, and Arabs, as well as Muslims, are always bad, always villains, dirty terrorists, ignorant desert-dwellers, murderers, scoundrels, etc. This Jewish-fueled bigotry runs so deep, it even extends to children’s cartoons (32).“Israelis” themselves have premier sway over decisions that are made in Hollywood (33), and the entertainment capital of the world has even served as a front for illegal Zionist nuclear activities and gun running (34).



In fact, the relationship between the Zionist entity and Hollywood is a “deepening” one and the two Jewish enclaves are “closer than ever before,” with more and more Hollywood Jews getting in touch with their ‘inner Zionist’ and making pilgrimage to the Jewish “state” and more and more “Israeli” television shows being adapted by Hollywood Jews for American television screens. The fortune that Jewish Hollywood is making, selling the Zionist agenda and indoctrinating all who immerse themselves in it, is intertwined with that of the usurping Zionist regime’s (35). Another key element of the Hollywood-“Israel” relationship isnormalizing the malevolent brutality of the occupation regime, improving its image “enormously” on the international scene through the importation of “Israeli” experiences and Hollywood’s implementation of them into film (36). Hence, the need for actresses like Portman who represent both sides of the same Zionist coin, “Israel” and Hollywood.





Natalie Portman does

care not about Syrians,

Sudanese, Lebanese,

Palestinians or anyone

else for that matter; she

cares only for "the tribe."

Conclusion: Portman’s Inhumanity And How To End Jewish Supremacy



When Natalie Portman said, “I’m more protective of humanity than of any of my own personal desires,” she was not only being disingenuous, she was maliciously lying through her teeth. She is helping build the hasbara against Syria because she is protective of the criminal Jewish “state,” because taking down Syria is very important to Zionist aims, not because she is “protective of humanity.” She is shilling for the Zionist war machine because it is her duty to do so as an “Israeli” citizen; as a constituent occupier.



If she gave anything worth a damn about humanity, it wouldn’t have been “Israeli” hospitals that she visited several years ago, but Lebanese hospitals, in summer 2006, when the genocidal Zionist regime wreaked havoc on Lebanon for 33 days, murdering, wounding or displacing hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children. It would’ve been Palestinian hospitals that she visited in illegally besieged Gaza, where the murderous Jewish entity animalistically butchered innocents for 21 days during Operation Cast Lead. It would’ve been Iraqi, Afghan, Yemeni, Pakistani or Libyan hospitals that she visited, where millions of men, women and children have had their lives stolen from them by the Zionist “war on terror.” How dare this person, this hasbaranik and usurper, even utter the word “humanity” when it is so translucently obvious that it is inhumanity that she represents. How dare this person, this Jewish supremacist and charlatan, speak of “stopping bloodshed” when every drop of innocent Arab and Muslim blood that her beloved “Israel” spills is on the hands of her and her odious tribal ilk.





This precious Lebanese child,

brutally murdered in the Zionist

entity's 1996 shelling of Qana,

doesn't register as a part of

"humanity" for Natalie Portman.

As much of a necessity as it is to free the lands of the oppressed from the parasitic presence of Zionism, it is just as much of a necessity to dismantle the global Jewish-Zionist network that upholds it. It is like a tribal machine and one of the most important engines that guarantees its inertia is the “chosenite” filth festival known as Hollywood. And if there is any denying that this network is important to the existence of the usurping Jewish dragon poisoning the holy land, please do note that donations (in the billions) by American Jews to Zionist organizations have doubled, repeat, doubled in the last 12 years, solidifying that the American Jewish community as a collective is very much committed to the preservation of “Israel (37).”



By gutting the network of international Zionism and leaving it in shambles with no power, the criminal “Israeli” regime’s most strategic lifeline will have been severed. Only then will Jewish supremacy over the global landscape begin to wane and this can only be done if its might and inner workings are unambiguously discussed and relentlessly exposed to the public. End the Jewish Lobby. End Hollywood. End the Zionist stranglehold over academia. End the Jewish-Zionist stranglehold over the media. End it with the truth. Speak the truth fearlessly and liars will disperse in fear. Speak it for the slaughtered Lebanese and Palestinian children that Natalie Portman refuses to even acknowledge. Speak it so persons like Natalie Portman and her overlords never have a prominent place in society ever again.





~ The End ~



Sources:



(1) Angelina Jolie Conscripted To Sell Genocidal ‘Humanitarian Intervention’ War Doctrine by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black



(2) Natalie Portman Calls For An End To Syrian Bloodshed by Renee Ghert-Zand, The Jewish Daily Forward



(3) Natalie Portman (1981- ) by The Jewish Virtual Library



(4) The Private Life Of Natalie Portman by Chris Heath, Rolling Stone Magazine



(5) What Natalie Knows by Evgenia Peretz, Vanity Fair



(6) The Great Book Robbery Of 1948 by Arwa Aburawa, The Electronic Intifada



(7) Screen Goddess by Lynn Hirschberg, The New York Times



(8) Portman Films In Israel by Dan Baron, Jewish Telegraph Agency



(9) Toronto Protest Escalates As Stars Sign Federation Ad Against Tel Aviv Boycott by Danielle Berin, The Jewish Journal



(10) Israeli Diversity Shown Even Among Leaders: Letter To The Editors by Natalie Portman, The Harvard Crimson



(11) Natalie Portman’s Israel by Brad A. Greenberg, The Jewish Journal



(12) The Accusation Of “Anti-Semitism” I: Zionism, “Jewish Israelis” And Revisionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion



(13) Religious Zionist Rabbi: Moroccan Jews ‘Can’t Match Ashkenazi Knowledge’ by Chaim Levinson, Haaretz



(14) Israel’s Humiliating Discrimination Against Arab Jews by Gerald Jacobs, The Telegraph



(15) The Sacred Landscape: The Buried History Of The Holy Land Since 1948; Chapter 4: Ethnic Cleansing, Section – Wracking The Groves, Page 165 by Meron Benvenisti, University of California Press



(16) Harvard Fellow Calls For Genocidal Measure To Curb Palestinian Births by The Electronic Intifada



(17) Professors Reflect On Natalie Portman by Abigail F. Schoenberg, The Harvard Crimson



(18) Dershowitz Once Celebrated Jewish Influence And Called Support For Israel A ‘Secular Religion’ by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss



(19) V For Zionism by Keith Johnson, Revolt Of The Plebs



(20) Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion



(21) Ghalioun Emails: Qatari Money And Lost Democracy by Al-Akhbar English



(22) McCain And Lieberman Meet With The Free Syrian Army by Josh Rogin, Foreign Policy



(23) US Jews Leading Darfur Rally Planning by Gal Beckerman, The Jerusalem Post



(24) The False Darfur ‘Genocide’ Numbers by Moon of Alabama



(25) Darfur $’s Funding West Bank Settlements by Thomas C. Mountain, Counter Currents



(26) Israelis Can Tell The Whole Story Of Sudan’s Division – They Wrote The Script And Trained The Actors by Fahmi Howeidi, Empire Strikes Black



(27) The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion



(28) A Strategy For Israel In The 1980s by Oded Yinon, Kivunim



(29) Jewish At The Root: Iraq’s Destruction, Hell Weapons, Hatred, Networking And The Interconnectedness Of It All by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion



(30) Let The Iranians Have Their Oscar–We’ll Take Everything Else by Jewdar, Heeb Magazine



(31) How Jewish Is Hollywood? by Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times



(32) How The Jewish-Zionist Grip On American Film And Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs And Muslims by Dr. Abdullah Mohammad Sindi, The Institute for Historical Review



(33) The Big Hollywood Lie: Denying That Jews Control The Film Business by The Institute For Historical Review



(34) ‘Hollywood Producer Was An Israeli Nuclear Agent’ by Yossi Melman, Haaretz



(35) Zionism And The Three-Picture Deal: Hollywood Rediscovers The Jewish State by Danielle Berrin, The Jewish Journal



(36) How Tel Aviv Became Big Business In Hollywood: Could Israel’s Newest Export Reshape Its Image? by Danielle Berrin, The Jewish Journal



(37) U.S. Jews’ Donations To Israel Double In Past 20 Years, Study Shows by Revital Blumenfeld, Haaretz















AL QAEDA IN SYRIA





Abdel-Ghani Jawhar is Lebanon's most wanted Islamist terrorist, and he has links to al-Qaeda.



Reportedly, he has been killed while planting bombs for the anti-Assad rebels in Syria.





Lebanon's most wanted Islamist terrorist 'killed planting ... - Telegraph





Jawhar was said by security sources quoted in the Lebanese media to have been killed near Homs.

According to one report, he blew himself up when a bomb he was preparing detonated prematurely.





He was the head of Fatah-al-Islam, which reportedly has ties to the CIA's al-Qaeda.

POSTED BY ANON AT 1:32 PM



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------















4 - April Memories : Deir Yassin Remembered







Remains of Deir Yassin. (Palestine Remembered)



By Felicity Arbuthnot



'No person has the right to rain on your dreams.' -- Martin Luther King, 1929-1968.



Many dreams have been rained on since peace was declared at the end of the Second World War, on 8th May 1945. Two veritable historic hurricanes were commemorated on 9th April, as was the burial of the man who dreamed: Martin Luther King.



The day Baghdad fell nine years ago, also marked the massacre in, and near destruction of, the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin by Jewish forces sixty four years before.



Ironically, in the month the State of Israel has arranged world-wide sixty fourth birthday celebrations (26th April) Palestine marked the sixty fourth anniversary of butchery and carnage, as almond , olive blossoms and spring flowers painted the surrounding slopes with fragrant life.



It also marked more than the day’s nightmare, it heralded the policy of the “cleansing” of Palestine’s villages. The displacement, destruction and still counting, the ever diminishing and fragmentation of what was Palestine.



Deir Yassin marked the first time Jewish forces had gone on the attack, setting a precedent, and an ongoing weeping wound through the collective Palestinian soul, as year after year, homes, farms, orchards, livelihoods even fishing is destroyed, disrupted - or separated by the Wall, “an iron curtain which has descended” across their land.



A graphic description of the attack on the village comes from the diaries of the Swiss representative of the International Red Cross, Jaques de Renier who was first to reach the site. He was let in by an “enormous German born member of the Irgun”, who told Renier he owed his life to the Red Cross.



The Irgun and Stern gang, had denied any involvement in the events at Deir Yassin and accused Ha Haganah (“The Defence”) the paramilitary organization under the British mandate of Palestine, who, subsequently became the core of the IDF (Israeli Defence Force.)



Sir Alan Cunningham, Britain’s High Commissioner, later firmly laid the blame with the Irgun and Stern gangs.



The spectacle on entry, made Reynier “gasp”, as did the youth of many attackers, men and women, some mere adolescents. “There were people rushing everywhere, in and out of houses, carrying Sten guns, rifles, pistols, long ornate knives. They seemed half mad. I saw a beautiful girl carrying a dagger still covered with blood. I heard screams.” The German remarked: “We’re still mopping up.”



“All that I could think of was the SS troops I’d seen in Athens”, Reynier wrote, witnessing: “A young woman stab and elderly man and woman, cowering on the doorstep of their hut.”



In the first house he reached: “Everything had been ripped apart, there were bodies strewn around … ‘’cleaning up’ was done with guns and grenades, their work finished with knives.” Seeing a movement, he discovered: “a little foot, still warm.” A ten year old girl “mutilated by a grenade”, was alive, who the German carried to an ambulance. Renier found an elderly woman hiding behind a woodpile: “paralyzed with fear”, and a dying man.



He estimated he saw two hundred bodies, one a woman, probably eight months pregnant, shot in the stomach. There were butchered infants. Schoolgirls and elderly women were raped then murdered. Ears had been severed to remove ear rings, bracelets were torn from arms and rings from fingers.



It subsequently transpired that the dead were taken to the rock quarry where the villagers had made their living from the expert stone cutting, for which they were renowned. The bodies were doused in petrol and set alight.



“It was a lovely spring day. The almond blossoms were in bloom, the flowers were out and everywhere there was the stench of the dead, the smell of blood and the terrible odour of the corpses burning in the quarry”, recalled a horrified Officer, Yeshurun Schiff, who in spite of the horrors he had witnessed could not bring himself to order revenge on the perpetrators because, he decided, Jewish history was: “too full of stories of fratricidal struggles”, to start another now in their new land.



A further tragic irony was the good relationship the village enjoyed with the neighbouring village of Orthodox Jewish settlers. The village arranged signals to warn them if Arab dissidents were approaching them and might attack, and the Jewish residents warned if their own dissidents were in the vicinity. The pre-dawn attack foiled that.



Jewish residents of Palestine overwhelmingly condemned and abhorred the attacks. In an extraordinary move, the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem excommunicated those responsible.



An appeal by the Arab Emergency Committee to the British to intervene to halt violence fell on the stone deaf ears of General Sir Gordon MacMillan, who said he would risk British lives only in the: “British interest.” Nothing changes.



The quiet hero that day, was the Red Cross’s Reynier, who rescued survivors, having been threatened by: “A dozen soldiers, their machine guns aimed at my body. I flew in to one of the most towering rages of my life, telling these criminals what I thought of them and threatening them with everything I could think of and then pushed them aside.”



On 10th April 1948, Albert Einstein wrote a searing, five line damnation to Shepard Rifkin, Executive Director of American Friends for the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel.



It read:



“When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine, the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organizations built up from our own ranks (Jewish.)



“I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.



Sincerely yours, Albert Einstein.” (Facsimile: 1)



A year later the settlement of Givat Shaul Beth was founded. In the 1980s the remains of Deir Yassin was bulldozed to make way for settlements, as was much of the cemetery, to make way for a highway. The streets of the new neighbourhoods were named after members of the Irgun and Hagannah.



The British shadow is long, over the remnants of Palestine. Their Mandate passed the right of house demolitions to the local military Commander, without limit or appeal in 1945. Although they stated it was repealed in 1948, they failed to follow the correct legal procedure ensure the rescinding had validity in law, thus demolitions are still carried out under the sixty seven year old British Directive119.



In 1947- 48, more than 700,000 Palestinians were forcefully removed or fled. Since 1967 to June 2011, 24,813 Palestinian homes have been destroyed with not one permit issued for Palestinians for any construction in the Occupied Territories, formerly their land.



According the Israeli Civil Administration, in the first five months of 2011, Israeli forces demolished more Palestinian homes than in the entire year of 2010, rendering homeless seven hundred and six Palestinians, of which three hundred and forty one were minors. (Imemc.org)



Further, the first draft of a law passed by a Committee of the Knesset (Parliament) last June requires, if it becomes full law, Palestinians who have their homes demolished by Israeli forces to carry the full costs of the destruction of their homes.



“Already, many Palestinian homeowners, mainly in Jerusalem, have been forced to pay for the forced demolition of their homes.”



It is perhaps apt that Deir Yassin, where this insanity arguably began is now also the site of the Kfaur Shaul Mental Health Centre, a large psychiatric hospital.



The demolitions are carried out using US-made D9 bulldozers, manufactured by the Caterpillar corporation, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Einstein would surely have wept.



In April 1963, in his Letter from Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King wrote: “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”



Heartening however, is whether in flotillas, last week’s “flytilla”, across the world, in actions globally too numerous to count, Jewish people from every walk of life, including doughty Holocaust survivors, are joining those from countless nations, as they are in Israel itself, demanding an end to the divide, the oppression, and, as Ilan Pappe has written so eloquently the collective paranoia of Israel’s : “… rollercoaster of mass hysteria.”



Notes:



(1) If Americans Knew.



- Felicity Arbuthnot is a journalist with special knowledge of Iraq. Author, with Nikki van der Gaag, of Baghdad in the Great City series for World Almanac books, she has also been Senior Researcher for two Award winning documentaries on Iraq, John Pilger's Paying the Price: Killing the Children of Iraq and Denis Halliday Returns for RTE (Ireland.) She contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













5 - The Prisoners In Gaza : Their Blackout Nightmare





By Ralph Nader







Have you heard much lately about the 1.5 million Palestinians illegally imprisoned by the Israeli government in the world's largest open-air Gulag? Their dire living conditions, worsened by a selective Israeli siege limiting the importation of necessities of life - medical items, food, water, building materials, and fuel to list a few - has resulted in an 80 percent unemployment rate and widespread suffering from unlawful punishment, arbitrary arrests and imprisonment in Israeli jails.







The horrific conditions were a result of the Israeli invasion of Gaza in late 2008, ignited by Israel's breaking of a truce with Gaza on November 4. Fourteen hundred people died, nearly three hundred of them children, and thousands were injured. The terror bombing of the Gazan population smashed into homes, hospitals, schools, ambulances, mosques, subsistence farms, UN facilities, and even the American International School. Israeli bombers destroyed over 30 members of one extended family in their home. That toll alone was three times the amount of Israeli fatalities, which included friendly fire.







The humanitarian crisis in crowded Gaza - about twice the size of the District of Columbia - "is now more dire than ever." That is the judgment of Norwegian physician and professor of medicine, Dr. Mads Gilbert, who just finished a ten-day speaking tour in the U.S. Dr. Gilbert, returning from a recent visit to Gaza, was one of the only two foreign doctors inside Gaza during the massacre of December 2008 to January 2009.







He says: "During the Israeli attack, I saw the effects of new weapons including drones, phosphorous and also DIME [Dense Inert Metal Explosives], which leave no shrapnel, but I witnessed their capacity to cut a child in two; they also leave radioactive traces."







Today, anemia and protein deficiency are widespread, reports Dr. Gilbert, especially among little children. UN and other relief supplies are inadequate, and UN humanitarian relief staff is often harassed by Israeli officials. Rebuilding pulverized Gaza is seriously obstructed by Israel blocking the imports of building materials.







Dr. Gilbert comments that he has "worked in other desperate situations in other places and Gaza is unique in a number of respects. It's a captive population - usually if civilians are being attacked, there's a safe place they can take refuge and then come back to their homes when the fighting has stopped. That doesn't exist for the people in Gaza since they are effectively imprisoned by the Israeli siege."







Writing in the prestigious British medical journal "The Lancet" in early 2009, Dr. Gilbert provided clinical details of the slaughter, including the destruction of ambulances and medical facilities that tend to the dying and the wounded.







He described a "shattered, attacked, and drained health-care system trying to help an overwhelming amount of casualties in a war between clearly unequal powers, where the attacker spares no civilian lives - be it man, woman, or child - not even the much-needed health workers of all professions."







It is no wonder the Israelis banned all foreign reporters, including those from the U.S. - the very country that provided the weaponry - thereby preventing the world from seeing the carnage as it happened.







The media ban made it possible for George W. Bush and president-elect Barack Obama to get away with describing this aggressive war with the identical phrase "Israel has the right to defend itself." But apparently, the Palestinians do not have any way to defend themselves against the second-most modern military arsenal in the world; and their pleas about who broke the truce and started the bloodshed are unheeded.







Crude, garage-built Palestinian rockets are no match for modern precision missiles, helicopter gunships, bombers and drones. Fortunately for the Israelis, the rockets failed to reach any population centers 99 percent of the time. It was a mystery even to the Israelis why the unchallenged Israeli air force and ground artillery did not knock out the primitive Gaza launching sites, given its spies, informants and knowledge of every block in Gaza.







Reporters would have dug out these stories were they allowed inside Gaza. Since 2009, the focus of both the Israeli and U.S. government toward Iran has taken Gaza, the thousands of Palestinians in Israeli prisons, and the swallowing up of more land in the Palestinian West Bank, off of the news screens in the West.







It is remarkable how successful the Israeli propagandists have been in controlling the news coverage. They have even sidelined prominent retired Israeli security, military and political leaders, who along with civic and peace advocates are seeking a two-state solution, an end to confiscation of Palestinian land and houses, and debunking war talk against Iran, designed for domestic political purposes in Israel and the U.S.







For example, Meir Dagan, director of the Mossad - Israel's CIA - from 2002 until 2010, called bombing Iran "the stupidest thing I ever heard." In agreement are many other Israelis in the know. But, as in the U.S. during the months before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, experienced voices of realism and sanity are not heard. Nor are sobering words of candor, as voiced by Israel's founding father, David Ben-Gurion, who said, of the dispossessed Palestinians years ago, "we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"







Isn't bringing these prominent Israeli truthsayers, peace advocates and military refuseniks to the U.S. Congress for their first-ever public hearing way overdue? At stake is peace or more wars in the Middle East. Also at stake is the possibility of another U.S. "war of choice" against Iran and the likely uncontrollable consequences that such belligerency would provoke. Would members of Congress let the AIPAC lobby block Israelis from coming here to present such testimony?







Or are the Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs Committees, chaired respectively by Democratic Senator John Kerry and Republican Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, satisfied with following their party lines?







- Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author of Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us. Visit: www.nader.org.











----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -















6 - Where the 'Self' Ends and the 'West' Begins





By Gilad Atzmon



When we were young there was hope in the air. There was good reason to look ahead. Some of us enrolled at university, but we also knew that if life did not shine on us, there were plenty of factories that offered enough jobs to those who were willing to toil. Yet it seems our children are not so lucky. Not much is awaiting them. The Western economy is on the brink of collapse.



When we were young, there were two ideologies around. In a cold manner, they bitterly chewing away at each other. One ideology maintained that equality and justice were the means towards liberation, whilst the other contended that celebrating one’s symptoms was actually the true meaning of human liberty. But it seems that these two ideologies have had very little impact on our life. In practice, we were all celebrating our symptoms - we were buying, selling, eating and drinking, but we somehow also enjoyed believing that ‘equality was a good thing’. Eventually these grand ideologies faded away and, not only do we not have ideologies anymore, we are not even capable of thinking ideologically. In the post ideological era, which we now inhabit, we kill millions in the name of ‘liberation’, we rain down depleted uranium shells on crowded cities whilst promising to export ‘liberal democracy,’ and we export Western ‘justice’ in Coca Cola cans.



When we were young, we reserved some respect for our political system. We somehow accepted that liberal democracy reflected our true values and beliefs. Fundamentally, we believed that it was a well-meaning idea and the best of all options. Hence we believed that at least theoretically, our democratically elected representatives were largely a true reflection of our desires.



We were not stupid but we were somewhat naïve. Being the sons and daughters of the Enlightenment, we were submerged in self-love. We were rich and spoiled. Yet, clearly, we failed to notice that our most elementary freedoms were being gradually diminished until the ‘freedom to consume’ was the only freedom left. We were basically free to buy and spend, to borrow and then to spend again and, without realising it, we were being reduced to a nation of shoppers with the political system existing solely to facilitate consumption, on a constantly growing grand scale.



When we were young, we read about liberation, and political struggles. We learned about heroic people who stood up against evil by fighting tyrants, Tsars, capitalists, communists, fascists and racists. Yet why is it so difficult now for us to identify precisely who is to be blame for the current global crisis, to identify who is to take responsibility for the collapse of our free markets and our own sense of values, ethics and justice? Is it a single person that we should blame? Is it Margaret Thatcher, George Bush, Tony Blair or Milton Friedman? Is it a party or rather is it an ideology? Is it the banks, Alan Greenspan or Goldman Sachs? Is it Wall Street or the City of London? Is it America? Or is it ‘just us,' humanity as a whole, that we should blame?



It is reasonable to argue that the gigantic hole in global finance commonly known as the credit crunch is actually a gigantic amplification of the hole in each of our pockets. The greedy capitalist system known as 'banking' and 'global expansionist markets' can be understood as a vast manifestation of our own personal greed, as explored through relentless consumption. Hard capitalism is a ‘continuum state’ of greed between the personal and the entire system.



Liberal democracy is commonly realised as a natural political extension of individual liberties. It is only natural then, that some of the worse aspects of our society and political system are actually deeply rooted in each and every one of us. The relentless appetite that we find at the heart of the capitalist system is a multiplied mirror image of our own bottomless inclination towards consumption.



Any profound criticism of the liberal system at this stage then, should entail some harsh self-criticism. Each and every one of us is an autonomous and ‘self-sufficient credit crunch.’ Just like the banks, we have also been spending money we did not have. And it seems our societies and ourselves are now clearly subjected to a similar malaise. We have been celebrating our symptoms collectively and blindly for too long.



We sometime envy the Arabs and their Spring. They have grasped who their enemy is (Western puppets rulers) and what their salvation is (Islam). Tragically, we understand that we are spiraling down into an inevitable long and dark winter. We know that politics and ideologies have failed us. We accept that we are dwelling in a post-political and post-ideological era, and yet we fail to understand what this may entail. The world, as we know it, is changing rapidly. Our so-called ‘liberties’ have turned against us and we dread the meaning of it all.



And yet we do not posses a means of understanding the condition we are subject to, simply because such conditions are merely an amplification of ourselves and our most precious beliefs. We fail to admit or decide where the ‘self’ ends and the ‘West’ begins. We do not know where London’s Al Tahrir square is. We cannot decide whether we really want to be liberated and we do not seem capable of even identifying who the enemy is.



The Western subject, as well as Western society, is submerged in self-love. Somehow we cannot understand how it is that a system that was created to explore our human liberties, can fail.



I suggest that a partial remedy for our malaise might be acceptance of a certain level of uncanniness, an acceptance that reason has its limits, and that ‘being in the world’ may be slightly mysterious after all. However, it seems as if it may take a while before we are brave enough to admit to ourselves that this is indeed the case.



- Gilad Atzmon is a writer and jazz musician living in London. His latest CD is In Loving Memory of America, and his latest book is The Wondering Who?. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com. (This article was originally published in www.thespanner.net.)













UN Criticizes Israel for Legalizing Settlements

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has criticized the Israeli government for legalizing the status of three illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.



"All settlement activity is illegal under international law," said Ban on Tuesday, adding that he was "deeply troubled" by Tel Aviv's unlawful move.



The UN chief made the remarks after the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the legalization of the outposts of Bruchin and Rechelim in northern West Bank and Sansana in the southern part of the occupied Palestinian territory.



Ban noted that the regime has an international obligation to refrain from "provocations" like constructing new illegal settlements in the occupied lands.



"Every single settlement built on Palestinian land is illegal," Palestinian Authority official Saeb Erekat said.



Around 350 Israeli settlers currently live in Bruchin, while some 240 settlers live in Rechelim. Nearly 240 more settlers reside in Sansana, which is located near the city of al-Khalil.



Outposts are newer and smaller Israeli settlements.



The international community regards all the Israeli settlements across the West Bank as illegal under international law, whether authorized by the Tel Aviv regime or not.



On February 22, the Israeli government approved the construction of 500 new illegal units in the West Bank settlement of Shilo, also legalizing more than 200 homes built in the West Bank without primary permits from Tel Aviv.



About 500,000 Israelis live in more than 100 settlements built since the 1967 Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as the number of settlers continues to climb.



(Press TV)











Israel's Iron Man : 'Stupid and Mean and Brutal'







The 'hero' of the affair is Lieutenant Colonel Shalom Eisner.



By Uri Avnery



'In blood and sweat / A race will arise to us / Proud and generous and brutal…' Thus wrote Vladimir (Ze'ev) Jabotinsky, the founder of extreme right-wing Zionism, who was also a writer and a poet. Present-day Likud leaders see him as their forefather, much as Stalin saw Karl Marx.



The world 'brutal' stands out, because it seems implausible that Jabotinsky really meant it. His Hebrew was not very good, and he probably meant something like 'hard' or 'tough'.



If Jabotinsky saw today’s Likud, he would shudder. His was a 19th century mixture of extreme nationalism, liberalism and humanism.



Paradoxically, brutality is the only one of the three traits that is prominent in our life today, especially in the occupied Palestinian territories. There is nothing there to be proud of, and generosity is something associated with the despised leftists.



The routine, everyday brutality that governs the occupied territories was caught on video this week. A searing flash in the darkness.



It happened on Route 90, a highway that connects Jericho with Beth She’an along the Jordan River. It is the main road of the Jordan valley, which our government aims to annex to Israel one way or another. It is reserved solely for Israeli traffic and closed to Palestinians.



A group of young international pro-Palestinian activists decided to demonstrate against the closure of the road. They invited their Palestinian friends to a jolly bicycle ride along it. They were stopped by a unit of the Israeli army. For some minutes they faced each other: the cyclists, some with Arab keffiyehs (headdresses) draping their shoulders, and the soldiers with their rifles.



The drill in such a situation is for the army to call the police, who are trained for this job and who have the means for non-lethal crowd dispersal. But the commander of the army unit decided otherwise.



What happened then was shown on a video clip taken by one of the protesters. It is clear, unambiguous and unequivocal.



The officer, a lieutenant-colonel, is standing opposite a fair-haired young man, a Dane, who was just looking on, neither saying nor doing anything. Nearby, protesters and soldiers are standing around. No sign of violence anywhere.



Suddenly the officer raises his rifle, holding it horizontally, one hand on the butt and one on the barrel, and then he drives the squared-off end of the magazine hard into the young Dane's face. The victim falls backward on the ground. The officer grins with satisfaction.



In the evening, Israeli TV showed the clip. By now, almost every Israeli has seen it a hundred of times. The more one sees it, the more one is shocked. The sheer brutality of this completely unprovoked act makes one flinch.



To veterans of demonstrations in the occupied territories, there is nothing new in this incident. Many have suffered brutality in many different forms.



What was unusual in this case was that it was caught on camera. And not a hidden camera. There were quite a lot of cameras around. Not only those of the protesters, but those of army photographers, too.



The officer must have been aware of this. He just did not give a damn.



The undesired publicity caused a national uproar. Obviously it was not the act itself that upset the military and political leadership, but the publicity it attracted. Coming at the same time as the glorious defense of Tel Aviv airport by 700 policemen and policewomen against the terrifying invasion of some 60 international human rights activists, such additional publicity was definitely unwanted.



The army Chief of Staff condemned the officer and promptly suspended him. All senior officers followed suit, the Prime Minister himself spoke out. As is well known, our army is “the most moral in the world”, so what had happened was the unpardonable act of a single rogue officer. There will be a thorough investigation, etc etc.



The hero of the affair is Lieutenant Colonel Shalom Eisner (“Iron Man”, in German).



Far from being exceptional, he seems to be the quintessential army officer, indeed the quintessential Israeli.



The first thing TV viewers noticed was the kippah on his head. “Well of course,” many murmured to themselves. For decades the national-religious movement has systematically infiltrated the officers’ corps of the armed forces, starting from officers’ induction courses and climbing up, with the aim of having one of their number end up as the army Chief of Staff. By now, kippah-ed lieutenant colonels are common – a far cry from the kibbutzniks who dominated the officers corps at the birth of our army. At the time of the incident, Eisner was a deputy brigade commander.



The national-religious movement, to which the core of the settlers belong, was also the home of Yigal Amir, the assassin of Yitzhak Rabin and of Baruch Goldstein, the mass-murderer of the Muslims in the mosque in Hebron.



One of the pillars of this movement is the yeshiva Merkaz Harav (“Center of the Rabbi”), where Eisner’s father was a prominent rabbi. During the evacuation of the Gaza Strip settlers by Ariel Sharon, Eisner Jr. was among the protesters. Last year Eisner was photographed on the very same spot on Road 90 fraternizing with extreme rightist demonstrators, who also protested on bicycles there.



He did not take the rebukes lying down. With unprecedented impertinence, he attacked the Chief of Staff, the Commander of the Central Front and his division commander for suspending him. He waved his bandaged hand to prove that he was attacked first and acted in self-defense. He even produced confirmation from some doctor that one of his fingers was broken.



That is highly improbable. First of all, the way he holds his rifle in the video would have been impossible with a broken finger. Second, the video shows that his act was not in reaction to any violence. Third, there were several army photographers around, who shot every detail (to be used as evidence if protesters were brought to trial in a military court). If any act of violence had taken place, their videos would have been displayed by the army the same day. Fourth, Eisner similarly struck two women protesters in the face and one male protester on the back- unfortunately off camera.



He fervently insists that he did the right thing. After all, he did break up the demonstration, right?



But he was not entirely without remorse. He publicly admitted that it “may have been a mistake to act this way in the presence of cameras”. With this the army and many commentators wholeheartedly agreed: they did not criticize his brutality, but his stupidity.



As an individual, Eisner is not very interesting. If armies refrained from enlisting stupid people, where would we be?



The trouble is that Eisner is not an exception, but rather a representative of a norm. There are some excellent people in the army, but Eisner typifies many officers who come out of the military melting pot.



And not only in the army. To paraphrase Jabotinsky: our educational system now produces “a race / stupid and mean and brutal”. How could it be otherwise after 60 years of relentless indoctrination and 45 years of occupation? Every occupation, every oppression of another people, corrupts the occupier and makes the oppressor stupid.



While still a teenager I worked as a clerk for an Oxford-educated, Jewish-British lawyer, many of whose clients were members of the British colonial administration. I found them mostly nice, intelligent and courteous with an engaging sense of humor. Yet the British administration acted with an astonishing lack of intelligence.



At the time I was a member of the Irgun, whose aim was to drive them out of the country. At my home there was an arsenal of guns, which were used to kill them.



Living between the two worlds, I constantly asked myself: how can these nice English people behave so stupidly?



My conclusion was that no colonial masters can behave intelligently. The colonial situation itself compels them to act against their better nature and their better judgment.



As a matter of fact, during the first years of the Israeli occupation, it was widely praised as “enlightened” and “liberal”. The then Minister of Defense, Moshe Dayan, gave orders to treat the Palestinians as generously as possible. He let them trade with the enemy and listen to enemy broadcasts to their heart’s content. In a gesture without precedent, he kept open the bridges between the West Bank and Jordan, an enemy country. (I joked at the time that Dayan, never having read a book, did not know that this was unthinkable.)



Behind this policy there was no benevolence – just a belief that if the Arabs were allowed to live their daily lives in peace, they would not rise up, but put up with an eternal occupation. Indeed this worked more or less for some 20 years. Until a new generation started the first intifada and the occupation became – well, stupid, mean and brutal. Along with the officers in charge.



Two days ago, Israel observed the annual Holocaust Remembrance Day. In this connection, I would like to quote Albert Einstein, a Jew and a Zionist:



“Should we be unable to find a way to honest cooperation and honest pacts with the Arabs, then we have learned absolutely nothing during our two thousand years of suffering and deserve all that will come to us.”



- Uri Avnery is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













7 - Settlers Raise Israel’s Flag On Top Of Ibrahimi Mosque





By Saed Bannoura
IMEMC & Agencies
April 26, 2012

A group of Israeli settlers raised Israeli flags on top of the fourth holiest site in Islam, the Ibrahimi Mosque in the southern West Bank city of Hebron. This is the first time ever since Hebron fell under Israeli occupation in 1967.





Image - Milad News Agency

The Milad News Agency reported that head of the Waqf and Endowment Department in Hebron, Zeid al-Ja’bary, slammed the provocative move and stated that “this is an attack against the religious and historic stature of this site to millions of Muslims around the world”.



He added that this is a “seriously dangerous provocative act” targeting the holy site.

The Israeli Prime Minister and his coalition partners have declared the Ibrahimi Mosque, also referred to as the “Cave of Patriarchs”, to be part of the Jewish Heritage sites; a move designed to preclude the Palestinian attempt to have UNESCO officially include the Old City of Hebron on its list of historic and archeological cities.



Hebron Governor, Kamel Hameed, held the Israeli government responsible for provocative acts and attacks carried out by settlers in Hebron.



Hameed told the Milad News Agency that “writing street names in Hebrew, renaming the mosque, and placing iron and electronic gates on its entrances are provocative acts that are meant to prevent the Muslims from entering it”.



He added that the Ibrahimi Mosque “is in the hearts and minds of millions of Muslims around the world”, and added that Israeli settlers are pushing the region into instability.



Hebron Mayor, Khaled al-Aseely, stated that this act is part of Israel’s violations against Islamic Holy sites and the historic heritage of the region, and falls under Israel’s ongoing violations, including the Israeli decision to consider the mosque as part of the “Jewish heritage sites”, a decision that was rejected by numerous human rights and cultural institutions around the world.



Related articles

Israeli Soldiers Invade Homes In Hebron, Jewish Settlers Attack Young Man(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Voices from the Occupation: Settler/soldier violence/detention of 16-year-old(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Hebron teen 'shot by Israeli settler' (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Israeli settlers storm into Palestinian home, occupy residence(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Settlers Install New Outpost Near Hebron (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Hebron Home Caged Due To Settlements (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Settlers Attack Two Towns Near Hebron (alethonews.wordpress.com)

The massacre of 1929 and the War of Narratives (alethonews.wordpress.com)

The right to water: Water cistern demolitions in Hebron area(alethonews.wordpress.com)



Why Palestinian prisoners are on hunger strike

by aletho



MEMO
26 April 2012

1.1 - The issue of Palestinian prisoners is one of the worst consequences of the Israeli occupation. Since 1967, over 700,000 Palestinians, 20% of the population of the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip have been detained. This number represents approximately 40% of the total male Palestinian population in the occupied territories.



1.2 - Today, there are about 6,000 prisoners in 17 Israeli jails and detention centres. They include six women and more than 200 minors.



1.3 - 330 Palestinians are being held in administrative detention with no formal charges having been brought against them in a court of law. 28 elected members of the parliament, and three former ministers fall within this category.



1.4 - Israel is currently holding all these Palestinian prisoners far away from their homes, and outside of the occupied territory. This constitutes a clear violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Article 76 of the Convention states:



"Protected persons accused of offences shall be detained in the occupied country, and if convicted they shall serve their sentences therein."



Article 49 also states:



"Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive."



1.5 - Article 32 specifically prohibits "murder, torture, corporal punishments, mutilation and ... any other measures of brutality whether applied by civilian or military agents". Since 1967, 202 Palestinians prisoners have died while being tortured in Israeli jails.



1.6 - Israel routinely tries Palestinians before military courts, none of which meet the most basic standards of international law; particularly the laws relating to the treatment of prisoners of war and people under occupation.



1.7 - In light of the above, there are now calls for the prosecution of Israeli officials at an international tribunal.



Download Full Fact Sheet



Related articles

1,600 Palestinian prisoners begin open-ended hunger strike in Israeli jails(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Ex-Palestinian prisoner: captivity in Israel, living in graves(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Detention of Palestinian political prisoners (alethonews.wordpress.com)

4 hurt in Ramallah protest to support detainees (altahrir.wordpress.com)

Scottish TUC delegates join Palestine freedom struggle - unanimously!
#PalHunger(occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com)







Jewish settlers attack Palestinian village, block Nablus road

by aletho



Ma'an - 26/04/2012



Settler attacks are common and rarely prosecuted

NABLUS - Settlers in the northern West Bank set up a roadblock and attacked a Nablus village on Thursday, a PA official said.



Ghassan Daghlas, who monitors settler activity in the northern West Bank, said that settlers blocked a main road that links the West Bank town of Huwwara to Tulkarem and Qalqiliya.



Settlers prevented Palestinian vehicles from passing through, causing a large traffic jam. Around 12 settlers also attacked the village of Urif in Nablus, clashing with local villagers.



Witnesses said the Israeli army was present during the incident but fired tear gas at the villagers.



In 2011, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reported that settler attacks had increased by 50 percent on the previous year.



The Nablus district experienced the majority of settler violence in 2011.







Israel Censors Bob Simon’s Report on Palestinian Christians

by aletho



Al-Manar
April 26, 2012

During Sunday night's episode of "60 Minutes," reporter Bob Simon's story on Arab Christians included a heated confrontation between himself and the Zionist ambassador to the United States Michael Oren.



The “60 Minutes” story tackled the displacement of Palestinian Christians by the Zionist Occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.



Oren also called Simon's report "outrageous" and "incomprehensible,” and reportedly called Jeff Fager, the chairman of CBS News, before the broadcast and said he had information the "60 Minutes" story was "a hatchet job." He was concerned that the piece was critical of the Zionist entity and could harm its reputation among American Christians.



In its report, Simon told Americans that there are Palestinian Christians, and the Right wing Zionists have attempted to displace, expropriate and erase the Palestinian nation, and to convince them that Palestinians don’t exist or if they do are enemies of the U.S.



According to the report, when the foe of the US was the Soviet Union, they made the Palestinians Communists. When the foe became al-Qaeda, they made the Palestinians violent fundamentalists. But if some percentage of Palestinians is Christians, then that fact disrupts the propaganda. In fact, millions of Palestinians are descended from the 700,000 or so Palestinians ethnically cleansed by the Israelis from what is now Israel in 1948, of whom about 10 percent were Christian.



The report also mentioned that some Palestinians are Lutherans, Catholics and Episcopalians, establishing a link of commonality between them and Americans, which raised the ire of the entity of occupation because it wants Americans identifying only with the so-called ‘Israelis’, not with Palestinians.



It also told Americans that ‘Israel’ is occupying and colonizing Palestinian land, and it let it slip that Palestinians in the West Bank need a permit to travel to Arab East Jerusalem and are subjected within the West Bank to humiliating check points that turn a 7 mile journey into an all-day ordeal.



Simon's story allowed Palestinians to speak for themselves as well, and to refute Oren’s anti-Palestinian talking points, where it mentioned a prominent Palestinian businessman and Coca Cola distributor saying that he knew of no Palestinian Christians who were leaving the West Bank and Jerusalem because of Muslims but that rather they were leaving because of the “Israeli Oppression.”



The report allowed the Palestinians to point out that the West Bank now looks like Swiss cheese, with Zionist colonies grabbing the good land and water, and the stateless Palestinians pushed into the holes; and that the way the Israelis built the Separation Wall isolated Bethlehem, Jesus’s birthplace and a city that still is 18% Christian, had made it “an open-air prison.”



It also described the Palestinian Kairos Document, calling for nonviolence, as a peaceful struggle by Palestinians against the Zionist Occupation and land grabs, particularly when it quoted a Zionist scholar putting “Political Judaism” on par with “Political Islam.”



According to sources, news of Simon's "60 Minutes" report reached the highest governmental levels of the Zionist entity, where a main daily Haaretz reported Tuesday that PM Benjamin Netanyahu and his political adviser Ron Dermer were "fully informed on the affair almost since its start."



A source told Haaretz that Israel's unsuccessful attempts to kill the "60 Minutes" report backfired as Oren's call to Fager became a central part of the story. "We awakened the dead," the source said.



However, officials in the Prime Minister's Office disagreed and insisted that their efforts delayed the broadcast and made the final version "softer."







A Palestinian Christian response to Michael Oren (alethonews.wordpress.com)





The right to water : Palestinian water cistern demolitions by zionist settlers in Hebron area

by aletho



23 April 2012
International Solidarity Movement, West Bank





On Monday April 23, 2012, the Israeli occupation forces destroyed four water cisterns outside of the city of al-Khalil (Hebron). Two of the destroyed cisterns were located in the Abweire area, a small agricultural neighborhood of 400-500 residents northeast of al-Khalil. The other two cisterns destroyed were located in Hal-Houl, south of al-Khalil. The demolitions came just one week after another four cisterns were destroyed in the Meshroona area south of al-Khalil.



Palestinians in these areas, who are located in Area C, are forced to depend on rain water cisterns for their crops and livestock because of unequal distribution of water resources to surrounding illegal, Zionist settlements. The destruction of such cisterns is part of a calculated strategy of forced displacement and ethnic cleansing in occupied Palestine. According to the Israeli organization Diakonia, water cistern demolitions over the past two years have directly affected almost 14,000 Palestinians, among whom several hundred have been forced to leave their homes because of lack of water. International law forbids the targeting of structures essential for the survival of the civilian population.



The day after their water cistern was demolished, activists with ISM visited members of the Ashfour family in Abweire in order to talk and survey the damage. The occupation forces did not stop with removing the top of the cistern, but actually smashed the sidewalls, rendering the structure totally useless. The occupation forces came without warning in four jeeps, an armored personnel carrier, an armored bulldozer, and another armored earth-wrecking machine, along with personnel from the Israeli permits and construction offices. They claimed that the cistern was constructed illegally, without the necessary permits, and began to destroy the cistern.







Within an hour the Ashfour family’s hopes for irrigating their crops lay in ruins. According to Hisham Ashfour, the cistern had been built almost ten years ago and served not only his family but about fifty people in his neighborhood. The other cistern destroyed in Abweire was also rendered completely unusable, having been filled in with dirt by an Israeli bulldozer.



Related articles

International activists assaulted by extreme settlers in Al Khalil(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Israeli occupation authority destroys Spanish-financed power station in Al-Khalil village (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Israeli Brutality: Violent arrests of Palestinians in Hebron and disappearance of Dutch volunteer (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Settler Violence: Broken Glass on Shuhada Street (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Israeli demolition 'displaces 120′ in Hebron village (alethonews.wordpress.com)

Impunity Under the Law: Settler attack in Jabari neighborhood(alethonews.wordpress.com)

Under Attack - the Golani Brigade's war on the Palestinian population of Al-Khalil/Hebron (alethonews.wordpress.com)





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















8 - The Holocaust, Sacred Ground and Obama’s Selective View of the Struggle for Human Dignity



By Nima Shirazi
Wide Asleep in America
April 23, 2012





In a speech at the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C., flanked by such Zionist luminaries as Elie Wiesel and Michael Oren, President Barack Obama referred to "those sacred grounds at Yad Vashem," the vast Holocaust memorial complex in Jerusalem. But considering the horrors of the Holocaust didn't occur anywhere near the grounds of Yad Vashem, one has to wonder what makes those grounds so hallowed. After all, Auschwitz is over 1,500 miles away from Jerusalem; Treblinka is nearly 1,600 miles away; Dachau is almost 1,700 miles away; Buchenwald is over 1,800 miles away. Do all Holocaust Museums stand on "sacred ground" just because of the subject matter they commemorate? If so, wasn't Obama himself standing on sacred ground at 100 15th Street SW in the District of Columbia? Will the ground upon which the Simon Wiesenthal Museum of (In)Tolerance is being built be sacred because of the museum, or because of the ancient Muslim cemetery it has uprooted and destroyed?



Perhaps the grounds of Yad Vashem are sacred, though. Only a short distance away, within eyesight, is where Deir Yassin used to be before Zionist militias wiped it and itsinhabitants off the face of the Earth.



Obama spoke of atrocities committed upon countless innocents, "just for being different, just for being Jewish" and warned against "the bigotry that says another person is less than my equal, less than human." One wonders what he would say if confronted with the fact that the indigenous people of Palestine are deliberately, systematically andinstitutionally discriminated against, imprisoned without charge or trial, occupied and colonized, bombed and burned, shot at and under siege because they are not Jewish and because they refuse to forget who they are and where they come from, they refuse to acquiesce to the six and a half decades of ethnic cleansing, aided and abetted, funded, immunized and ignored by the nation Barack Obama now represents.



Obama said that "'Never again' is a challenge to defend the fundamental right of free people and free nations to exist in peace and security -- and that includes the State of Israel." He mentioned Israel by name six additional times in his speech. Never once did the words Palestine or Palestinians cross his lips. He then proceeded to conflate Zionism with Judaism, present international law as anti-Semitic, and pulled a Netanyahu by warning of the looming specter of a caricatured Iran, one that exists only in the warped minds of fear merchants and warmongers.



Said Obama, "When faced with a regime that threatens global security and denies the Holocaust and threatens to destroy Israel, the United States will do everything in our power to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."



Obama also spoke of civilians "subjected to unspeakable violence, simply for demanding their universal rights," he spoke of "all the tanks and all the snipers, all the torture and brutality unleashed against them," and vowed to "sustain a legal effort to document atrocities so killers face justice, and a humanitarian effort to get relief and medicine" to those desperately in need. Obama praised those who "still brave the streets," who "still demand to be heard" and "still seek their dignity." He praised the "people [who] have not given up."



He was referring to Syria, of course, and not to Bil'in, Ni'lin, or Budrus. He didn't meantanks in Gaza, IDF snipers who open fire on unarmed protesters and murderschoolchildren or the torture and abuse of Palestinians- including children - in Israeli jails. When he spoke of "unspeakable violence," the "humanitarian effort" and the "legal effort to document atrocities so killers face justice," Obama obviously didn't mean thedevastation of Gaza by the Israeli military, the ongoing humanitarian crisis there or the recommendations of the Goldstone Report.



Obama patted himself on the back for "sign[ing] an executive order that authorizes new sanctions against the Syrian government and Iran and those that abet them for using technologies to monitor and track and target citizens for violence." Of course, these sanctions were not extended to U.S. chums Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, or South Korea - all places where internet censorship is rampant and pervasive.



Obama concluded by stating, "To stare into the abyss, to face the darkness and insist there is a future -- to not give up, to say yes to life, to believe in the possibility of justice" and declared, "If you can continue to strive and speak, then we can speak and strive for a future where there’s a place for dignity for every human being."



He was speaking, rightfully, to the survivors of the Holocaust. But he was also, unwittingly and unwillingly, speaking for those who continue to struggle for equal rights, for universal rights, for dignity, freedom, sovereignty and self-determination, for justice long deferred in their own historic and ancestral homeland. He was speaking for Palestine.



But don't tell Elie Wiesel.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













9 - Washington Felons Fret Over Hanky-Panky in Cartagena

by Philip Giraldi, April 26, 2012





Americans are frequently most hypocritical when they are responding to a sex scandal. The tale of the sins and omissions of the Obama secret service team in Colombia is still being revealed, piece by piece. The miscreants constituted a so-called advance team, flying on a military aircraft, which goes into a location where a protected party is going to be present. The advance team liaises with local police and security personnel at the U.S. embassy or consulate. It checks out security at the airport, along the route of travel on the ground, at the hotel, and at the various venues where meetings will take place. It writes up reports so the team that actually travels with the president will be prepared to provide a security envelope, working with the locals. The advance team members normally leave well before the president arrives.



All of which is to say that the advance team members are not actually protecting anyone and are basically doing a survey to improve the level of security for someone who will follow. They are not normally on 24-hour duty and, in my experience, they tend to be unmarried young men who frequently take advantage of the opportunity provided by foreign travel to hit some bars and try to meet some women. There is not necessarily anything wrong with that. Now, admittedly, the narrative as it is playing out regarding more than a score of prostitutes and extreme inebriation demonstrates a complete lack of discretion and is certainly over the top, but I have to think their crime is a matter of degree rather than commission unless there were indiscretions relating to what they were doing that might have compromised the security of their mission, which does not appear to be the case. It seems clear that they did not discuss what they were working on in Colombia with the women, and there was no exposure of sensitive information.



Not to belabor the issue, but it is not exactly unusual for some government officials, when traveling, to openly indulge in both alcohol and prostitutes without anyone at State Department or CIA even raising an eyebrow. Traveling on the government dime, referred to as “TDY,” is frequently regarded as an excuse to behave badly. And the indiscretions extend to all sexual persuasions, with some officials well known for engaging in reckless homosexual activity while traveling, including in countries where such interaction is illegal. I know of two very senior officers in the CIA in the 1990s who were pedophiles. There was considerable trepidation whenever they traveled to certain foreign destinations, but no one ever tried to stop them.



While I was in Barcelona as CIA chief, a certain U.S. ambassador with a roving (jest intended) assignment in Europe would frequently arrange to visit the city and invariably call me to ask which bars would be best for picking up prostitutes. He would describe his “needs” in very specific terms. When I complained to the State Department’s inspector general about the calls on security grounds, that he was casually discussing my CIA status on the phone and was even opening himself up to blackmail if anyone was listening in, it was treated as a non-event. Indeed, official travelers who get into trouble while drinking to excess or exercising their libidos are frequently extended diplomatic immunity by the embassy and sent on their way. In the Colombia incident, if one of the Secret Service officers had not gotten into a fight with a prostitute over her compensation and attracted the police, there would have been no story at all.



So the demands to hang these men out to dry coming from both the Obamas and Mitt Romney are perhaps more than a little hypocritical. They are only reasonable if the team was operating under standing orders or guidelines forbidding certain types of behavior while overseas, which I doubt was the case. In this instance the team, and its supervisors, are guilty of exercising extremely bad judgment, which normally means they would be slapped on the wrist and reassigned to other duties. One should note in passing that whether one approves or disapproves of the sex trade or drinking alcohol, prostitution is legal in Colombia, as is drinking for anyone over the age of 16. The resort to prostitutes by visitors to Cartagena is so institutionalized that the hotel where the Secret Service team was staying had a policy in place that they should leave their identity documents at the front desk and be out of the room by 7:00 a.m.



But let’s accept that the Secret Service team should be punished somehow for behaving badly and exercising poor judgment in a high-profile situation in which at least a modicum of personal restraint was called for. That’s where the blatant hypocrisy inherent in the situation kicks in. The same people, both Republicans and Democrats, as well as media pundits who are screaming for blood, are complicit in the Obama administration’s refusal to take any action against other real crimes committed by government employees. That would certainly include CIA staff engaged in illegal torture of terrorism suspects under George W. Bush, as well as the people who approved of and enabled the torture, such as Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, and several Justice Department lawyers, notably, John Yoo and Jay Bybee.



For a moment, let’s compare the two issues. On one side, a group of U.S. government travelers in a foreign country broke no local laws and compromised no secret information but behaved astonishingly indiscreetly considering that they were performing a task that of necessity had to remain low profile. On the other hand, we have a group of men, aided and abetted by CIA doctors, all of whom had to know they were acting illegally in engaging in torture but who decided to proceed anyway. The torture was carried out over the course of months and was constantly refined to make it more effective, which it did not do, as it was basically an ineffective tool, but it did become increasingly more painful for those on the receiving end. CIA Director of Clandestine Services José Rodriguez even destroyed video evidence to preempt any after-the-fact investigation, indicating that the torturers knew very well that there might be consequences for their actions. Nevertheless, all of the perpetrators have been given a free pass, and one might reasonably assume that they have even been protected and promoted for what they did. Former CIA Director George Tenet, who personally approved of the practice, was even given the Congressional Medal of Freedom at the White House, clearly a bit of unintended black humor.



Likewise, the United States has failed to take any responsibility for the scores of innocent men that it subjected to rendition, which was the abduction and transfer to a country where torture would be carried out to obtain confessions. Renditions can in no way be regarded as legal or ethical, and many European countries that participated in the practice under pressure from Washington after 9/11 are now engaged in identifying and punishing those involved. But nothing has happened in the United States, which drove the whole process. The Obama administration has even cited state-secrets privilege to block legal challenges to the procedure by those who were victimized, making the entire government complicit. Are those who ordered renditions and are now protecting the practice in any way less guilty than the Secret Service team? Where are the reprimands? Where are the forced early retirements?



And now there is the fiasco of the scores of congressmen and ex-government officials calling for the removal of the Mujahedin e-Khalq (MEK) from the State Department terrorist list. The MEK is a terrorist cult that has killed Americans. Speaking on its behalf is material support of terrorism, surely a more heinous crime than sleeping with a prostitute in a country where prostitution is legal. So where is the Justice Department?



The American public has been thoroughly brainwashed by a media that is selling a product rather than exposing and discussing what is actually wrong in our country. The Kardashians are certainly better known to most Americans than is Abu Ghraib. Lurid tales of sex and celebrity misbehavior predominate to such an extent that the naughty Secret Service agents will be remembered long after any thoughts of torture or rendition have been tossed down the memory hole.



Read more by Philip Giraldi

The Disappearing Terrorists – April 18th, 2012

The Babylonian Captivity of Washington – April 11th, 2012

The Islamophobia Excuse – April 3rd, 2012

Good Night, America, and Good-Bye – March 28th, 2012

The No-Fault March to War – March 21st, 2012





+ Weeping four-year-old girl accused of carrying a GUN by TSA officers after she hugged her grandmother while passing through security

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















10 - Latest Message from Israel’s Nuclear Whistle Blower TO : Obama, Peres and SECURITY



by Eileen Fleming





‘Thanks’ to The Patriot Act, all of my overseas communications are potentially monitored and I have been in contact with Gaza and Syria; but most likely the communications I have sent to Israel’s Nuclear Whistle Blower, Mordechai Vanunu [since 2005] have also been monitored by Israel’s SECURITY/Mossad/Shabak, for Vanunu remains under 24/7 surveillance in east Jerusalem, “waiting” for his “freedom now!”



On 21 April 2012, Vanunu wrote:



“Today, 21 April, is the eighth anniversary of Mordechai’s release from prison, when the annual restrictions on his freedom come up for renewal. We call for these restrictions to be lifted and for him to be allowed to leave Israel.”



Two days later, Vanunu recommended the following Youtube, which he published three years ago with the comment: “May this Tsunami will check little bit the new US president OBAMA. May OBAMA start doing some real actions for the freedom and abolition Atomic weapons.”









Vanunu Mordechai-April-/214/2004,-11



I asked Vanunu, “What do you say to Obama TODAY?”



Vanunu readily replied “My message to Obama, Vanunu is very supporting Obama policy, Obama Ideology of a Middle East Free from all Nuclear weapons. Vanunu is ready to help Obama in this. Diplomacy Now!!! Freedom Now!!”



In his 2012 speech to AIPAC, President Obama announced he would award The Presidential Medal of Freedom to Israeli President Shimon Peres this summer.



The award is intended to recognize individuals who have made “an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors”.



Obama said Peres has “been a powerful moral voice that reminds us that right makes might, not the other way around.”



After President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, Israeli President Shimon Peres stated in his congratulatory speech:



“Very few leaders if at all were able to change the mood of the entire world in such a short while with such profound impact. You provided all of humanity with fresh hope, with intellectual determination, and a feeling that there is a Lord in heaven and believers on earth. Under your leadership, peace became a real and original agenda. And from Jerusalem, I am sure all the bells of engagement and understanding will ring again. You gave us a license to dream and act in a noble direction.”



Within days of the announcement for 2009’s Nobel Peace Prize, twenty-two time nominee, Mordechai Vanunu declined the honor in a letter to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Oslo:



“I am asking the committee to remove my name from the nominations…I cannot be part of a list of laureates that includes Simon Peres…Peres established and developed the atomic weapon program in Dimona in Israel…Peres was the man who ordered [my] kidnapping…he continues to oppose my freedom and release…WHAT I WANT IS FREEDOM AND ONLY FREEDOM….FREEDOM AND ONLY FREEDOM I NEED NOW.”



In 1994, Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat and Peres were all awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for playing a part in achieving the Oslo Declaration of Principles. According to the preamble of the DOP, peace was to be based on mutual respect and reconciliation.



Alfred Nobel’s intention was to reward people with a moral backbone and he hoped to create icons and examples to humankind.



I had hoped President Obama would have seen his Nobel Prize as a mandate and he would also have held Israel accountable for its nuclear deceptions, omission, obfuscations and human rights abuses against Mordechai Vanunu–who was 9 years old in 1963, when the Zionists came to his home town of Marrakesh, Morocco.



The Zionists convinced his father to abandon his thriving general store and pack up the first seven of eleven children for the land of milk and honey. Instead, the Vanunu’s were banished to Beersheva, one of between 400-500 Palestinian villages Israel has ethnically cleansed since 1948.



As Israel’s Deputy Minister of Defense, Shimon Peres met with President John Kennedy, at the White House.



Kennedy told Peres, “You know that we follow very closely the discovery of any nuclear development in the region. This could create a very dangerous situation. For this reason we monitor your nuclear effort. What could you tell me about this?”



Peres replied, “I can tell you most clearly that we will not introduce nuclear weapons to the region, and certainly we will not be the first.”



President Obama, is now the third sitting American president to win the Nobel award, and his peers include Mikhail S. Gorbachev, who won the Peace Prize for helping end the Cold War which raged from 1945 to 1991, and Nelson Mandela, who fought for the end of Apartheid in South Africa.



The apartheid regime in South Africa existed from 1948 until 1994; but it was not until the late 1980′s that the American government got on-board with the over twenty years of a global call for boycott, divestment and sanctions that finally brought that apartheid system to its knees.



On October 2, 2009, The Washington Times reported that “Obama agrees to keep Israel’s nukes secret [and] reaffirmed a 4-decade-old secret understanding that has allowed Israel to keep a nuclear arsenal without opening it to international inspections.”



In 2005, Vanunu, told me:



“President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building atomic weapons. Prime Minister Ben Guirion said, ‘The nuclear reactor is only for peace.”



“Kennedy insisted on an open internal inspection. He wrote letters demanding that Ben Guirion open up the Dimona for inspection.



“When Johnson became president, he made an agreement with Israel that two senators would come every year to inspect. Before the senators would visit, the Israelis would build a wall to block the underground elevators and stairways. From 1963 to ’69, the senators came, but they never knew about the wall that hid the rest of the Dimona from them.



“Nixon stopped the inspections and agreed to ignore the situation. As a result, Israel increased production. In 1986, there were over two hundred bombs. Today, they may have enough plutonium for ten bombs a year.” [1]



On April 5, 2009, President Obama stood on the world stage in Prague and admitted, “As the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act…When we fail to pursue peace, then it stays forever beyond our grasp. We know the path when we choose fear over hope. To denounce or shrug off a call for cooperation is an easy but also cowardly thing to do. That’s how wars begin. That’s where human progress ends…the voices of peace and progress must be raised together…Human destiny will be what we make of it…Words must mean something.”



Vanunu gave us a license to dream and act in a noble direction, when he told the truth about Israel’s nukes 26 years ago, as he wrote from Ashkelon Prison:



“The passive acceptance and complacency with regard to the existence of nuclear weapons anywhere on earth is the disease of society today.



“This struggle is not only a legitimate one – it is a moral, inescapable struggle…no government, not even the most democratic, can force us to live under this threat. No state in the world can offer any kind of security against this menace of a nuclear holocaust, or guarantee to prevent it.



“Already now there are enough nuclear missiles to destroy the world many times over. This issue should unite us all, because that is our real enemy.



“Any country, which manufactures and stocks nuclear weapons, is first of all endangering its own citizens. This is why the citizens must confront their government and warn it that it has no right to expose them to this danger. Because, in effect, the citizens are being held hostage by their own government, just as if they have been hijacked and deprived of their freedom and threatened.



“Indeed, when governments develop nuclear weapons without the consent of their citizens – and this is true in most cases – they are violating the basic rights of their citizens, the basic right not to live under constant threat of annihilation.



“Is any government qualified and authorized to produce such weapons.” [Ibid]



In April 1999, thirty-six members of the US House of Representatives signed a letter calling for Mordechai Vanunu’s release from prison because they believed “we have a duty to stand up for men and women like Mordechai Vanunu who dare to articulate a brighter vision for humanity.”



President Clinton responded with a public statement expressing concern for Vanunu and the need for Israel and other non-parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty to adhere to it and accept IAEA safeguards.



Many voices of peace and progress have been raised over the years and all that has been lacking is the political will to do the right-meaning correct things.



I am Eileen Fleming for US HOUSE and I approve of all of my messages.





1. Mordechai Vanunu’s FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial and My Life as a Muckraker: 2005-2010



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------













http://www.federaljack.com/?p=174555









11 - Slavery by Consent -The UNITED STATES CORPORATION

April 24, 2012 by POPEYE

















(chasluim34) Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.



In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD — and that was very significant as you will read.



Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.



1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.



With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).



The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.





Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.



The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.



THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.



It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not!



Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.



What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.



Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed.



By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.



The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XhFxr1B44c



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------















12 - The Duty of the Military in a Militarized Empire



by Sartre Batr





Those who serve in the military are in a difficult position. The oath taken by enlisteesstates, “I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” The internal conflict between supporting and defending the Constitution and obeying orders is at the heart of the dilemma of honor and duty. Those who accept that the Presidential chain of command is by nature constitutional; lack a proper understanding of history and professes an even greater ignorance of current affairs.



Ever since Congress abrogated their lawful war power authority to declare war, the military industrial complex has embarked on a path of global empire. The consequences of such un-American internationalist imperialism have turned the country into a hollow shell of a once great nation. NeoCons and their liberal cousin counterparts champion perpetual interventionism and continuous oversea deployment, deny this stark reality.



False flag operations used as incessant excuses to expand the permanent war machine, demean and ultimately will destroy the moral purpose of our country. Propaganda and disinformation used to spread the jingoism fever infects the body politics. Those who remember the disgusting treatment, upon the separation from service, of Viet Nam draftees welcome the positive homage of recent military personnel.



However, there is an attitude that challenges all the flag waving and medal awards. Gary D. Barnett presents a viewpoint that is not shared by most military brass. Mr. Barnett writes in Thank You for Your Service? No Thanks!



“What service is actually being praised by those conditioned to say these empty words? Why are they thanking and praising nearly every soldier they see?



Is it because hatred of the U.S. is increasing, and new enemies are being created in the Middle East and all around the rest of the world?



Is it because thousands and thousands of innocent people are being killed now in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and many more are being threatened?



Is it because 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 foreigners, mostly innocent civilians, have died just since World War II due to U.S. interference and war?



Is it because indefinite detention without due process, torture, assassination, and rendition are now common and accepted practices?



Is it because suicide rates among American soldiers have increased 80% since the Iraq War began?



Is it because mental problems now send more military personnel to the hospital than any other cause?



Is it because destruction and separation of military families is rampant?



Is it because civil liberties have all but disappeared due to so-called terrorism legislation? (terror legislation would be more accurate)



Is it because of the creation of the USA PATRIOT Act, Military Commissions Act, NDAA, TSA, and Department of Homeland Security (DHS)?



Is it because of the massive buildup of killer drones abroad and at home?



Is it because the huge deficit spending to support multiple aggressive wars is causing economic chaos?



Is it because of the surging number of double amputees of American soldiers?



Is it because of increasing energy costs due to the United States unwarranted presence in the Middle East region?



Is it because the domestic police have now become a brutal militarized force, bent on controlling the entire population?”



This perspective fundamentally challenges the underlying foreign policy that structures military expenditures to project superpower force at the expense of actual domestic defense. As long as the National Security Council and the State Department pursues the policeman of the world policy, the military will be asked to implement unnecessary austerities that perpetuates the corrupt “world community” dominated by a financial tyranny. No wonder, that the blowback against our real interests is the only sure response that comes from such foreign adventures.



Full Spectrum Dominance is no substitute for true national security.



“The war on terror is an excuse to divert attention from the accelerated loss of rights and freedoms. Each step may seem insignificance and subtle, but the direction is always undeniable. Fear from any foreign threat seldom extends to the measures instituted by the domestic authority. Willingness to forget that legitimacy for your government is based upon your consent is epidemic. People are eager to demonstrate their devotion to the State, as they surrender their birthright as if it meant nothing.”



The source of the scourge that underpins obeying unlawful orders stems from a false obedience. Criminal civilian commands are not legitimate authority. The unconstitutionality of the National Defense Authorization Act is clear. Brian J. Trautman, a military veteran writes on the NDAA,



“This year’s legislation contains highly controversial provisions that empower the Armed Forces to engage in civilian law enforcement and to selectively suspend due process and habeas corpus, as well as other rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, for terror suspects apprehended on U.S. soil. The final version of the bill passed the House on December 14, the Senate the following day (ironically, the 220th birthday of the Bill of Rights). It was signed into law by President Obama on New Year’s Eve. With his signature, for the first time since the Internal Security Act of 1950 and the dark days of the McCarthy era that followed, our government has codified the power of indefinite detention into law.”



Nothing new about laws or executive orders that strip constitutional protections, so what can an honest American serving in the military services do in response to their duty? Stewart Rhodes, founder of OathKeepers talks about the NDAA and provides the answer in the video Organizing a Military Stand Down Against NDAA. PFC Bradley Manning comes to mind when an active service personnel reveals the sins and dictates of the foreign policy elites. Kim Zetter reports in Wired,



“Manning is charged with 22 violations of military law for allegedly stealing records and transmitting defense information in violation of the Espionage Act, among other charges, which could get him up to life in prison if he’s convicted. In chat logs, Manning said he leaked the cables because he felt that the world needed to be aware of military activities that he believed were potentially illegal.”



The Bradley Manning media coverage is an essential blackout of the extent that the foreign policy psychopaths, that provides the orders for the military establishment is the cause of the anguish and death that responsible soldiers endure.



The officer corps ultimately bears the heaviest burden for enforcing illegal orders. The basic principle that honorable duty resides in the protection of the nation, should be accepted. However, the practical application falls dramatically short, when the military substitute the office of the Presidency as the essence of the nation. Willingness to follow the commands of a dictator directly leads to the Gary D. Barnett assessment.



Where is the line that needs to be drawn that neutralizes the treason that routinely comes out of the corridors of power? The Pentagon is comprised of careerists that all too often are willing to sacrifice the safety of the American public for their own advancement. War games never take into account that the immediate enemies of our country hold office, administer imperium policies and work for the financial oligarchy.



The globalists are more than plutocrats they are the ultimate and true enemy. The critical duty that military resides in a commitment to a genuine America First foreign policy. The Commander and Chief, no matter who occupies the Oval Office, is a mere selected puppet that is on a short leash.



The military needs to refuse unlawful orders by standing down and stand up for a constitutional republic.



SARTRE – April 22, 2012



Read the entire article on the BATR archive page

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













13 - The Exodus of Christians out of the Holy Land & Other Videos









BLACKWATER IN SYRIA

Reportedly, the Pentagon-linked Blackwater company is behind some of the violence in Syria.

http://aangirfan.blogspot.pt/2012/04/blackwater-in-syria.html





Listen to this 4-part 30 min interview with the brilliant E. Michael Jones on "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" .

-youtube.com/watch?v=jB8RVz…

CrossTalk on BDS: Sanctioning Israel (ft. Walberg, Baddar and Atzmon)

What goals has the BDS movement achieved so far? Does it aim for a constructive solution to the conflict? How should Israel react to it? Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky agree that the goal of the movement is to destroy Israel – how valid is this judgment? Can the movement reinvent itself and win support from those who criticize it today? CrossTalking with Gilad Atzmon, Eric Walberg and Omar Baddar.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/23/crosstalk-on-bds-sanctioning-israel-ft-walberg-baddar-and-atzmon/









Jewish groups hate CBS doc "Christians in the Holy Land" shows persecution

.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinio… Doc found here : cbsnews.com/video/watch/?i…





Christians of the Holy Land

April 22, 2012 4:00 PM



The exodus from the Holy Land of Palestinian Christians could eventually leave holy cities like Jerusalem and Bethlehem without a local Christian population. Bob Simon reports.



Christians of the Holy Landhttp://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7406228n



E. Michael Jones - "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" - Part 1 of 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB8RVzGqJiI&feature=relmfu



Cloud of depleted URANIUM heading towards Hawaii and West Coast USA

http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/4272012-cloud-of-depleted-uranium-heading-towards-hawaii-and-west-coast-usa/





Why our country has gone to hell

Wake up America !

http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=15915





The ELITE blew it , REVEALED their plans to start WORLD WAR 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnY_yXVrWiU&feature=related





THE ROTHSCHILDS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4IGwuKdUQ&feature=related





Build up to WW3 - CIA Predicts War By June! Iran Pledges Revenge Against EU Embargo

de TechbyTigz

VÍDEO EM DESTAQUE50672 views

A Rothschild Speaks - Listen Closely

de TheFlexEffect

187306 views

2:25If This Does Not Get Thru To You; Nothing Will!!!

de TheLipperTube

212775 views

10:47Ron Paul Incredible Video Twice Removed YouTube

de alexdlocoa





World War 1: What Happened?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZRvKH69R6k&feature=player_embedded









































-------------------------------------------------------------------------------











14 - Press TV Banned, the New Democracy



Germany follows US and UK attacks on Iranian TV and has their international English news blocked.









Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. ~Potter Stewart



It was through a simple email sent to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) officials that the Media Regulatory Office (MHA) based in Munich notified of the decision to remove the Iranian English-speaking channel Press TV from German airwaves.



The authority has claimed that Iran’s English-speaking channel does not have a license for broadcast in Europe.



This shutdown comes after Press TV was banned in Great Britain in January 2012 by Ofcom, the government-approved media regulatory authority. [1]



On its part, the channel believes the decision is part of a strategy by Westerners to silence an inconvenient voice.



Press TV drew the attention of the UK public in particular for its coverage of the Occupy protest movement in the United States and Britain, as well as for offering viewers a different perspective on the offensive launched against Libya or Syria.



Voltaire Network recalls that freedom of expression is a prerequisite for any democracy. It can only be restricted by law. Now, in this case, censorship does not stem from a court ruling following the commission of crimes or offenses, but from a simple administrative decision of an obvious political nature.



The Lebanese news channel Al-Manar was taken off the air in a similar manner, first in France, then in all Western states [2] At the time, Al-Manar had been accused of broadcasting an anti-Semitic program, but the examining magistrate never succeeded in establishing the charge and the case was not pursued. Ultimately, it was the Conseil d’Etat (i.e. the administrative court, not criminal court) which banned the channel alleging reasons of public order disturbances in connection with the controversy sparked by the accusation of antisemitism, in spite of the fact that it could never be substantiated.



Successive administrative bans in Europe, over the last six years, of Lebanese, Palestinian, Libyan, Syrian and Iranian news channels illustrate the inability of the European Union to address the issue other than to resort to censorship and propaganda and by forsaking the most basic principles of democracy.



Such administrative bans slammed on Middle East television channels clearly aim to prevent EU citizens from gaining a different perspective on the conflicts in this region, even though wars are being contemplated in which Europeans would be brought in. In this sense, such measures are in breach of resolutions 381 [3] and 819 [4] of the United Nations General Assembly, which make it mandatory for Member States to “remove barriers that prevent peoples the free exchange of information and of ideas essential to understanding and international peace. ”



PRESS TV lays out the facts behind their ban …





After years of struggle to impede the operations of Iran’s English news channel, Britain did all it could to make Press TV to disappear from the country’s television screens for questionable reasons.

Since its launch in 2007, Press TV has been a thorn in the side of Britain’s right-wing and pro-Israeli groups who worked rigorously to limit its operations inside Britain as the mission of the channel was “to give a second eye to Western audiences,” as described by Press TV CEO, Mohammad Sarafraz.



In 2010, the whistleblower website WikiLeaks revealed that the US and British governments were engaged in “exploring ways to limit the operations of the IRIB’s Press TV service, which operates a large bureau (over 80 staff) in London.”



Nevertheless, they needed a well-thought-out conspiracy as the revealed cable disclosed “UK law sets a very high standard for denying licenses to broadcasters. Licenses can only be denied in cases where national security is threatened, or if granting a license would be contrary to Britain’s obligations under international law.”



The well-thought-out conspiracy started with several attacks on Press TV from British banks. The most blatant instance came in 2011 when the 84% state-owned National Westminster Bank, commonly known as NatWest, froze Press TV’s account, leaving a devastating impact on the operations of Press TV Ltd., Press TV’s production company in London.



In February 2011, the whistleblower website WikiLeaks revealed that NatWest had refused to respond to their requests asking for the reasons behind their decision.



Britain’s latest attack on Press TV came on Friday when policy advisor to the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Ed Richards, decided to revoke the channel’s broadcasting license.



The official reason behind the decision made by Ed Richard, who is currently the Controller of Corporate Strategy at the BBC and the head of Britain’s Office of Communications (Ofcom), was that Press TV’s editorial team was based in Tehran.



This comes as several other channels, including CNN and Al Jazeera, have their editorial teams in countries other than Britain, in other words, the US and Qatar.



Despite Britain’s all-out efforts to prevent British people from being able to hear the voice of the voiceless, Iran’s alternative news outlet still provides British people with its wide coverage of issues absent in the British media.







Germany illegally removes Press TV from SES Astra

Under pressure from the German government, Munich media regulatory office (BLM) has made an illegal decision to remove Iran’s international English Channel, Press TV, from SES Astra at 19:00 local time on Tuesday.



Press TV – In an email sent to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) officials, Vice President of the SES Platforms Services, Stephane Goebel, noted that the BLM has asked Press TV be immediately removed from the platform.



The authority has claimed that Iran’s English-speaking channel does not have a license for broadcast in Europe.



“BLM has…sent us an official request to immediately seize the service of the above-mentioned channel [Press TV],” Goebel noted.



Regretting the decision, Goebel added that his company “will be no longer able to keep the Press TV signal on air and will need to shut down the service without further notice.”



The move is clearly part of a plot orchestrated by the West to silence the voice of the Iranian English-language channel.



~UK ban on Press TV Violates Free Speech~







We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. ~John F. Kennedy



Source: Press TV and Voltairenet.org



Editing: Debbie Menon



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------















15 - Kosovo Massacre Fraud by Former German Minister Scharping Revealed



Germans caught with pants down over Kosovo, Rudolf Scharping







… by Sir Vojislav Milosevic

Director, Center for Counter-terrorism & World Peace

Belgrade, Serbia





“These photos clearly show the massacre perpetrated on 29. January in the vicinity of Rugovo, confirming that the plan for the expulsion of the “Kosovars”was put in action.“















In Kosovo, the Albanian terrorist movement linked with Germany and USA and escalated their activity toward NATO intervention. Serbs fought against well equipped Albanian armed forces which coordinated their military activity with the help of NATO. The American 30 tons of depleted uranium will continue raging for the next 4.5 billion years of half-life.



All weapons that contain DU are considered to be radioactive poison gas weapons and as such they violate the Geneva Conventions under the 1925 Geneva Poison Gas Control Protocol.



DU weapons are a permanent terrain contaminant and have a half-life of 4.5 billion years. DU can cause DNA damage, as well as cancer, leukemia and tragic birth defects. It is a kidney, liver, and neuro-toxin. Multiple independent studies confirm this.



Under 1244 UN Resolution, Kosovo would remain part of Serbia pending a peaceful resolution of its status. That UN Resolution was blatantly ignored by the US, German and other EU parties in 2008.



Kosovo is a tiny parcel of land in one of the most strategic locations in all Europe from a geopolitical standpoint of the US military objective of controlling oil flows and political developments from the oil-rich Middle East to Russia and Western Europe.



The controversial piece of real estate today called Kosovo was a part of Serbia until the NATO bombing campaign in 1999 demolished what remained of Milosevic’s Serbia.



Germany’s and Washington’s prompt recognition of Kosovo’s independence in February 2008, significantly, came days after elections for President in Serbia confirmed pro-Washington, it means anti-Serbian, Boris Tadic had won a second four year term.



With Tadic’s post secured, Washington could count on a compliant Serbian reaction to its support for Kosovo. It means that Boris Tadic as elected President of Serbia betrayed the Constitution Act as the supreme law of any country, and became a traitor of the highest level…











YouTube - Veterans Today -



Some of the falsehoods presented as fact about what was happening in Yugoslavia in the 1990s in order to justify foreign intervention have been long known, but they remain unacknowledged by the mainstream media. A recent German TV program about Rudolf Scharping, former German defence minister, is a notable exception.



The Sarajevo market bomb was not set by Serbs but by Bosnian Muslims, as the UN later confirmed. The skeletal “Serb concentration camp” victim was a nonsense, as the BBC’s John Simpson confirmed and the “10,000 deaths in Kosovo” were proved to be a complete myth.



The Commander of the OSCE’s Kosovo Verification Mission in 1999 (just before Yugoslavia was attacked), Roland Keith, and the former Canadian Ambassador in Belgrade James Bissett have both condemned the war and defended the Yugoslav Government.



Commander Keith described the KLA as a terrorist organisation which had a grip on most villages in Kosovo. He had direct experience of the lies told by villagers about ethnic cleansing and he said he never saw the Yugoslav Army mistreat anyone in Kosovo.Bissett said that the 1999 attack was a “put up job” and quotes the most revealing admission by the formerBritish Defense Minister, Lord Gilbert, who told the British House of Commons in July 2000 that the terms that NATO sought to force upon Milosevic at Rambouillet were deliberately designed to provoke war.



Now we have a respected German Television program “Time Travel” broadcast in January 2012 providing clear proof of the fraud practiced by the German Government to justify to their public an attack on Yugoslavia in 1999.



It is the equivalent of the “dodgy dossier” of that other great “builder of Europe” Tony Blair, and shows the lies told by the then German Minister of Defence Rudolf Scharping to the press.



The proof came from a German policeman who actually took the photographs used by Scharping but who knew there had in fact been no “massacre” of “civilians” but a battle between armed Kosovo terrorists and Serb forces.





YouTube - Veterans Today -



This is a translation of the „Time Travel“ program:



Newsreader: “We will now show you some pictures that are difficult to watch. They were made during the war in Kosovo. They are important because 13 years ago they were presented to the German public as a justification for the war against Serbia. However, those pictures were misused. This at least is the claim by the man who took them with the help of a colleague. He is from the state of Schleswig-Holstein.”



Narrator: “Henning Hensch, who is from Lutenburg, has done a great deal of thinking these last 13 years, ever since he became a part of the story of Kosovo, which had moved all Germans – the story, he claims, that fooled Germany.”



Henning Hensch: “For me, Rugovo represents an example of the use of information for political ends.”



Narrator: “As a policeman, Hensch had seen a great deal, but nothing like what he saw in the Kosovan village of Rugovo on 29. 1. 1999. More important, Hensch could not believe the way in which the event was exploited a couple of months later. The then Minister of Defence Rudolf Scharping used the photos as evidence that the Serbs had committed a massacre against the innocent unarmed Kosovo Albanians.”



Rudolf Scharping: “These photos clearly show the massacre perpetrated on 29. January in the vicinity of Rugovo, confirming that the plan for the expulsion of the “Kosovars” was put into action.”



Narrator: “However, according to Hensch who took the photos, they represented evidence of a fire fight – not a massacre. On 29. January 1999, Hensch was asked to come to Rugovo (you can see him on the left). At that time he was an OSCE observer in Kosovo.”



Henning Hensch: “When we got there, we saw a red van. As far as I can remember, there were 11 corpses, neatly stacked. Evidence of shooting could be seen on the front of the van. It was clear that it was a battle… and nothing else.”



Narrator: “A battle between the UCK rebels and Serbian forces. Three months after the event, Rudolf Scharping unveiled the photos as evidence that a massacre had been carried out on civilians.”



Rudolf Scharping: “This makes it clear that the army and the special police forces and later… gangs of released convicts and others… took part in these murders. These images are shocking…”



Narrator: “The pictures from Rugovo purported to show what the German public desperately needed – a proof that NATO air strikes against Serbia were necessary.”



Henning Hensch: “I was having breakfast in Skopje when I heard Scharping express his shock at what the Serbian “bad guys” had done to the “unarmed” Albanians.”



Interviewer: “What were your thoughts?”



Henning Hensch: “That he must be off his rocker.”



Narrator: “These are the photos that Rudolf Scharping didn’t show. He didn’t show the Albanians’ weapons, their UCK badges and membership cards and their ammunition. He didn’t show the clear evidence of fighting.”



Henning Hensch: “There can be no talk of a massacre here, and however inconvenient this might sound, these were military battles.”



Narrator: “The photos showed by Scharping were taken after the official investigation had been completed and the bodies removed by the Serbian police. Despite the fact that journalists and cameras were present, Scharping stated three months later that the photos were secretly taken and brought to Germany by a German officer.”



Rudolf Scharping: “I would very much like to introduce the lieutenant to you, but he is currently undergoing treatment as a consequence of taking these photos and the trauma they caused…”



Narrator: “We inquired at the Federal Defence Ministry if a German officer was in Rugovo at that time and if he had taken photos. After a three-week enquiry, we received the following reply: ‘To the best of our knowledge, no German officer taking photos was in Rugovo on 29. January 1999.’ Balkan experts have suspected Scharping for a long time. One of them, Konrad Clewing, has no doubt that the German government sought evidence in order to persuade the public of the need for a war in Kosovo.”



Konrad Clewing: “The Socialist/Green coalition government had just come to power in the autumn of 1998 and was desperate to prove its loyalty and ability to its doubting partners.”



Narrator: “The manoeuvre was a success. German media believed Scharping’s story of the Rugovo ‘massacre’. The message was: ‘This is why we are fighting!’ but it was propaganda according to Clewing.”



Konrad Clewing: “The propaganda strategy was further developed and primed during that week against the background of public concern.”



Henning Hensch: “I remember that the public support for military action against Serbia was falling, so they had to pressure the public… which they did using our pictures.”



Narrator: “However horrific, the photos were misused according to Henning Hensch to justify a war he considered unsupportable from the very beginning. This has made him suspicious and somewhat embittered.”



Newsreader: “We have tried several times to contact Rudolf Scharping… without success.”





James Bissett - Balkan Wars Period

At the time of the events in the late 1990′s several prominent independent individuals spoke out against the position of the west.



Roland Keith, the Commander of the OSCE’s Kosovo Verification Mission, and James Bisset the Canadian Ambassador in Belgrade both condemned the NATO attacks on Yugoslavia.



The then British Defense Minister, Lord Gilbert, told the House of Commons in July 2000 that the terms that NATO sought to force upon Milosevic at Rambouilletwere deliberately designed to provoke war.



I am convinced that in time and with the help of informed journalism such fragments of truth will be collated into a more balanced picture of the events in Kosovo in the late 1990′s.



„Rambouillet peace conference“ and „Rambouillet Accords“ were nothing else but organized theft of Serbian resources by Western corporations.



Even the Serbophobic New York Times admitted in 1998 article: “Below Kosovo, a war’s glittering prize awaits the conqueror“. However, that same media rarely mentioned the 17 trillion dollars in mineral assets of Serbia.



Serbia’s mineral resources are the richest in all Europe – west of Russia. Although the average person watching the news in the evening has never heard of „Stari Trg“, it has been a prize changing hands for 2.000 years.



The wealth of „Stari Trg“ is legendary. Precious metals were mined there more than 2.000 years ago, first by the Greeks, than by the Romans.









These mines were the grand prize in the Nazi occupation of the Balkans during the 2WW, after Germany grabbed control from the British. The mines have great industrial and military importance. The Nazis used batteries produced there to power their U-boats. Today, submarine batteries are still made there.



The enormous mineral wealth of Kosovo is never publicly discussed by U.S. President Clinton, UN Ambassador Richard Holbrooke or the Pentagon generals. They spoke only of „self-determination“ of the Albanian population of Kosovo. They never mentioned what US-imposed „self-determination“ means.



It means colonization under the guise of „liberation“, like what U.S. did to Puerto Rico, Cuba, Philippines, or elsewere, hundred years ago. Serbia wanted to preserve its industry and natural resources for the future.



In the Meantime, in Washington…



“On behalf of the American people, I congratulate you with the fourth anniversary of your independence”, President Barack Obama said in the telegram sent to Kosovo’s “head of state” on February 17.



According to Obama, since Kosovo’s declaration of independence the country has made significant advancement in the building of a multiethnic, pluralist and tolerant society in the heart of the Balkan area.



“In the light of your efforts to achieve European integration as the continuation of the reforms you are carrying out in the fields of politics, the economy and the rule of law, I am convinced that Kosovo will succeed in securing its full integration in the North-Atlantic community.”



The United States, Obama concluded, will remain one of Kosovo’s strongest partners and Kosovo can count on the ongoing support of the United States in building a better future.



Immediately after the bombing of Serbia in 1999, the Pentagon seized a 1000 acre large parcel of land in Kosovo at Uresevac, near the border to Macedonia, and awarded a contract to Halliburton when Dick Cheney was CEO there, to build one of the largest US overseas military bases in the world, Camp Bondsteel, with more than 7000 troops today.







Camp Bondsteel - Why so Big, and Why Here?



The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, also sent a letter of congratulations to Kosovo’s leadership:



“Kosovo may be a young country, but you hold a promising future, and the United States is committed to supporting an independent, sovereign, multi-ethnic Kosovo. I commend Kosovo’s elected leaders for their dedication to the aspirations of the citizens of Kosovo through stronger democratic institutions, greater economic opportunities, and promoting the rule of law.



This path will lead the citizens of Kosovo to full Euro-Atlantic integration, and to lasting stability and prosperity for your country. The United States is a friend and partner, and we stand with you as we work together for a more secure, peaceful, and prosperous Kosovo. I wish all the people of Kosovo a joyous celebration and best wishes for the year to come.”



Kosovo is not recognized as a legitimate state by either Russia or Serbia or over one hundred other nations. However, it was immediately recognized when it declared independence in 2008 by the Bush Administration and by Berlin.



The US strategic agenda for Kosovo is primarily military, secondarily, it seems, narcotics trafficking. It’s prime focus is against Russia and for control of oil flows from the Caspian Sea to the Middle East into Western Europe.





Kosovo Drug Seizure

It also protects the multi-billion dollar heroin trade, which, significantly, has grown to record dimensions in Afghanistan according to UN narcotics officials, since the US occupation.



Kosovo and Albania are major heroin transit routes into Europe. Kosovo is mentioned as a key point for the transfer of heroin from Turkey and Afghanistan to Western Europe.



Those drugs flow under the watchful eye of the Hashim Thaci puppet-government.



A February 22, 2005 German BND report, labeled Top Secret, which has since been leaked, stated:



The criminal organizations in the background there foster political instability.“Through the key players—for example Thaci, Haliti, Haradinaj—there is the closest interlink between politics, the economy and international organized crime in Kosovo.



US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced that Washington will “help” Kosovo to join NATO as well as the European Union.



She made the pledge after a recent Washington meeting with Kosovo „Prime Minister“ Hashim Thaci in Washington where she praised the progress of the „Thaci government“ in its progress in “European integration and economic development.”



Editing: Jim W. Dean















----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





04.03.2012

Pyotr ISKENDEROV

Strategic-Culture.org





Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Map of the Battle Over Dominance in Europe

Traditionally for the republic which used to be a part of the former Yugoslavia, the March 1 Sarajevo celebration of the two decades of Bosnia and Herzegovina's independence attracted Croats and Muslims but was completely boycotted by the local Serbian community. Croat representative to the tripartite presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Zeljko Komsic said on the occasion that the republic became an independent and sovereign country on March 1, 1992 in line with the will of the majority of its citizens, with his Muslim peer Bakir Izetbegovic adding, in a reference to the dissenting Serbian community, that eventually all of the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina would learn to love it. Serb member of the tripartite presidency Nebojša Radmanović shunned the ceremony.



The confidence expressed by Bakir Izetbegovic, the son of late Bosnian Muslims' leader Alija Izetbegović, appears unwarranted considering the story of the independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. On March 1, 1992 the administration of the republic which was at the time built into the Yugoslavian Federation claimed to have won an independence referendum, and within weeks from the declaration a civil war was raging across the ethnically divided newborn state, including its capital Sarajevo. While the exact death toll related to the conflict, the bloodiest in Europe's post-World War II history, remains unknown, available estimates put it at around 200,000.



The 1992-1995 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina stands out as exceptionally ferocious even in the grisly context of Yugoslavia's collapse which began with the secession of Croatia and Slovenia and lingers on in the form of the Kosovo crisis. The otherwise credible view that Yugoslavia was torn apart by ethnic and religious discord and that an array of external forces – the UN, NATO, the EU, and Muslim fundamentalist groups – contributed to the existing disintegration trend does not apply to Bosnia and Herzegovina where the US and Europe played the key role and deliberately did whatever it took to fuel the conflict.



Bosnia and Herzegovina galloped towards independence over a period of several months. In October, 1991, the republic's parliament passed a sovereignty memorandum by a simple majority instead of the qualified majority normally required by the constitution. As the next step, in January, 1992 the secession supporters – an overwhelming majority of the Muslims and a large part of the Croatian community of Bosnia and Herzegovina – pressed for an independence referendum which, given the ethnic disposition in the republic where Serbs accounted for a third of the population, could not but sanction its withdrawal from Yugoslavia. The poll was held on February 29 – March 1 and already by the end of its last day the Sarajevo administration announced that its independence plan had been confirmed and the Bosnian Serbs, who opposed it having refrained from the vote, that they were ready to fight for their interests.



It became clear at the moment that the republic was sliding into a civil war, and several European politicians made attempts to prevent disaster. Great Britain's Lord Carrington and Portuguese ambassador Jorge Cutileiro offered what seemed to be a reasonable solution when they suggested recasting Bosnia and Herzegovina into a confederation with strict power-sharing among the republic's ethnic groups and the delegation of most of the administrative functions to local communities. With international mediation, Muslim, Croatian, and Serbian leaders – notably, Radovan Karadzic who was later held responsible for the bloodbath in Bosnia by the West - penned the deal on March 18, 1992 in Lisbon. The plan, however, was derailed when, at a secret meeting on March 28, 1992, US ambassador to Yugoslavia Warren Zimmermann urged Alija Izetbegović to revoke his signature and pledged full US assistance in having Bosnia and Herzegovina internationally recognized as a unitary republic. Izetbegović immediately annulled the agreement signed in Lisbon, recognition was granted to Bosnia and Herzegovina by the US, Germany, and other major Western powers shortly thereafter, and, predictably, fighting erupted in the republic.



Influential US congressman Tom Lantos took the wraps off the US agenda in Bosnia and Herzegovina when, in 2007, he cited the US diplomatic involvement in the republic as “yet another example that the United States leads the way for the creation of a predominantly Muslim country in the very heart of Europe”. In his own words, “This should be noted by both responsible leaders of Islamic governments, such as Indonesia, and also for jihadists of all color and hue”. Washington, therefore, knowingly opened Europe's doors to radical Islamists by shifting on the Serbs the blame for the failure of the settlement in Bosnia and Herzegovina and throwing the US support behind the Bosnian Muslims whose forces counted in their ranks thousands of Mujahideen from North Africa, the Middle East, the US, Germany, and elsewhere. Bin Laden's associate and Gama'at al-Islamiyya leader Anwar Sha'ban, for example, was known to have serially organized in Bosnia and Herzegovina the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) camps via which Arab and Egyptian militants flooded the Balkans, and the ominous al Qaeda head personally covered the expenses of the Mujahideen heading for Bosnia, the province which Islamists intended to convert into a kind of Afghanistan at the heart of Europe.



The US and NATO unilateralist meddling in Bosnia and Herzegovina echoed with a spread of destabilization over the entire Balkan region. The Balkans could be seen as a distant proving ground for the “limited war” technology from Washington's perspective, but Europe's course vis-a-vis Bosnia and, later, Kosovo was and remains in many regards self-defeating. No doubt, part of the explanation in the 1990ies was that Germany, in the wake of its national reunion, was pursuing serious interests of its own. The conflict in the region's central Bosnia and Herzegovina presented Berlin with opportunities to either set up its own military outposts in the Balkans or to call for the relocation of the US military bases Germany was hosting since the Soviet era.



Bosnia and Herzegovina used to be free of Muslim fundamentalism until Rabita, a New York-headquartered NGO whose mission can be best described as the organization of pan-Islamist political and military support for globalization, gained inroads into the province in the late 1980ies. Way ahead of the war, Rabita planted in Bosnia and Herzegovina a network of bases which, in the humanitarian guise, served as entry points for radical preachers from Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco plus helped sustain various paramilitary anti-Serbian groups. The activity was ideologically and politically coordinated by Alija Izetbegović – his treatise The Islamic Declaration, where Islam was proposed as the basis for identity and statehood steadily topped the reading lists of Muslim youths in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the aftermath of the 1995 Dayton deal, Washington was forced to try pushing at least some of the Mujahideen out the province and even asked Sarajevo to close the offices of notorious groups like the Saudi al Harmain. The administration of Bosnia and Herzegovina had to take into account that a faction of US congressmen were beginning to feel that Sarajevo's contacts with downright international terrorists grew into a source of permanent embarrassment.



These days, the West increasingly puts to work in the world's strategic regions the humanitarian intervention scenarios and subversion techniques tested in the Balkans in the 1990ies. Z. Brzezinski holds that, potentially, the Balkans are an important stake in the battle over dominance in Europe. Speaking of Bosnia and Herzegovina, it obviously stays ethnically divided and scarred by the bloody past conflict even two decades since rolling out its independence.









------------------------------------------

















16 - Why The US Needs a Major War

At the moment, we find ourselves in the middle of a turbulent phase of the global evolutionary cycle which commenced in the 1980ies and is projected to end by the middle of the XXI century. In the process, the US is clearly loosing its hyperpower status…



Estimates offered by experts from the Russian Academy of Science show that the current period of severe instabilities should end roughly in 2017-2019 with a crisis. The crisis will not be as deep as those of 2008-2009 or 2011-2012 and will mark the transition to an economy built on a novel technological basis. The economic revival will, in 2016-2020, likely entail serious shifts in the global power balance and serious military-political conflicts involving both the global heavyweights and the developing countries. The epicenters of the conflicts will supposedly be located in the Middle East and the post-Soviet Central Asia.



The century of the US global military-political dominance and economic primacy appears to be nearing completion. The US failed the unipolarity test and, bled by permanent Middle Eastern conflicts, currently lacks the resources retaining the global leadership would take.



Multipolarity implies a much fairer distribution of wealth across the world and a profound transformation of the international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, etc. At the moment the Washington consensus seems irreversibly dead and the global agenda should be topped by the task of building an economy with much lower uncertainty levels, tighter financial regulations, and greater justice in the allocation of revenues and economic benefits.



The centers of economic development are drifting from the West, which counts the industrial revolution among the main accomplishments on its record, to Asia. China and India should be preparing for an unprecedented economic race in the process against the backdrop of the wider competition between the economies employing the state capitalism and the traditional democracy models. China and India, the world's two top-populous countries, will define the directions and the pace of development in the future, but the main battle over global primacy is going to be played out between the US and China, with the choice of the XXI century post-industrial socioeconomic model and political system at stake.



The question arising in the context is how the US is going to react to the transition?



* * *



It has to be taken into account that any US strategy proceeds from the assumption that loosing the global primacy is unacceptable to the country. The linkage between global leadership and the XXI century prosperity is an axiom for the US elites regardless of political details.



Mathematical modeling of the global geopolitical dynamics warrants the conclusion that a victorious large-scale war fought with conventional warfare is the US only option to reverse the fast meltdown of its unsurpassed geopolitical status.



It is an open secret that occasionally non-military methods of pushing rivals off the stage - as in the case of the collapse of the Soviet Union – also work, and the corresponding technologies are being permanently polished in the US. On the other hand, up to date countries like China or Iran evidently prove immune to external manipulation. If the current geopolitical dynamics persists, the global leadership change can be expected by 2025, and the only way the US can derail the process being to ignite a major war…



The country facing an imminent leadership loss has no option but to strike first, and this is what Washington has been doing over the past 15 years. The US specific tactic is to pick as a target not an alternative candidate for geopolitical primacy but countries engaging which appears affordable at the moment. Attacking Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, the US sought to handle purely economic or relatively minor regional problems, but a bigger game would clearly require a more significant target. Military analysts hold that Iran plus Syria and the non-Arab Shia groups such as Lebanon's Hezbollah face the greatest chances of getting hit in the name of a new global redistribution.



The redistribution is in fact underway. The Arab Spring spun off and managed by Washington created the appropriate conditions for a merger of the Muslim world within a single caliphate. The US plan is that this new formation will help the waning hyperpower maintain its grip on the world's key energy resources and safeguard its interests vis-a-vis Asia and Africa. No doubt, the challenge prompting the US to compose this new type of arrangement is the swelling might of China.



Getting rid of Iran and Syria which stand in the way of the US global dominance would be Washington's natural next step. Attempts to topple the Iranian regime by means of inciting civilian unrest in the country failed fabulously, and military analysts suspect that an intervention scenario akin to those implemented in dealing with Iraq and Afghanistan eventually awaits Iran. The plan has serious chances to materialize even though as of today even the withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan presents the US with considerable problems.



The implementation of the Greater Middle East project - along with appreciable damage to the standing of Russia and China - would be the key prizes the US hopes to win by fighting a major war… The design became widely known in the US following the publication in the Armed Forces Journal of the notorious Peters map. The motivation which loomed behind the artifact was to muscle Russia and China out of the Mediterranean region and the Middle East, to cut Russia off the South Caucasus and Central Asia, and to disconnect China from its most important energy suppliers.



The materialization of the Greater Middle East plan would ruin Russia's prospects for a peaceful and steady development as the unstable US-controlled South Caucasus would be sending shock waves across the North Caucasus. Since, obviously, the unrest would be detonated by the forces of Muslim fundamentalism, Russia's predominantly Muslim regions are sure to be affected.



The US is unable to sustain the Washington consensus any longer relying on economic and political instruments. China's Jemin Jibao painted the picture with utmost clarity when it wrote that the US grew into a global parasite which prints unlimited quantities of dollars, exports them to pay for its imports, and thus buys Americans lavish living standards by robbing the rest of the world. Russia's premier expressed a similar view during his November 17, 2011 China tour.



At the moment China is pressing hard to limit the sphere of the US dollar circulation. The share of the US currency in China's reserves is shrinking, and in April, 2011 the Chinese Central Bank announced a plan to completely opt out of the US dollar in international clearances. The blow to the US currency domination will not remain unanswered, obviously. Iran is similarly trying to reduce the dollar share in its transactions: an Iranian oil exchange opened in July, 2011, where only Euro and Iran's own currency are accepted. Iran and China are negotiating over the supply of Chinese products in return for Iran's oil, which, among other things, would make it possible to route trade around the sanctions imposed on Iran. The Iranian leader said his country's trade volume with China should reach $100b, and that would render the US plans to isolate Iran meaningless.



The US efforts to undermine stability in the Middle East may in part be attributable to the reckoning that the reconstruction of the region's devastated infrastructures would necessitate massive dollar infusions, the result being the revitalization of the US economy. In 2011, the US strategy aimed at preserving its global leadership started to translate into power-based policies as Washington considers depreciating the dollar holdings among the possible solutions to the crisis problem. A major war can actually serve the purpose. In its wake, the winner would be able to impose its own terms on the rest of the world as it did when the Bretton-Woods system came into being in 1944. For Washington, running the world takes being ready to fight a major war.



Can Iran, given the necessary backing, put an end to the US universal expansion? The question will be addressed in the next paper.











Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















17 - CIA & MOSSAD KILL US TROOPS





On 21 April 2012, we read about how the CIA and Mossad have murdered US troops in Iraq.



http://www.federaljack.com/?p=19311





Roman generals often killed their own troops. The earliest documented 'decimation' occurred in 471 BC.







The Italian General Luigi Cadorna applied decimation to under-performing units during the First World War.





In his book Stalingrad, Antony Beevor recounts how, during the Second World War, a Soviet commander practised decimation on retreating soldiers by walking down the line of soldiers at attention, and shooting every tenth soldier in the face until his pistol ran out of ammunition.





The 1957 movie Paths of Glory depicts a few World War I soldiers randomly selected to be executed as punishment for a failure by their group.











Why would the CIA want to kill American soldiers and blame the killings on Moslems?







"To enrage American troops so that the slaughter continues".





ACCORDING TO FEDERAL JACK (http://www.federaljack.com/?p=19311):





Special forces have been caught pretending to be Arab insurgents running around shooting people in Iraq.



On July 23, 2005, a detachment of 19 female US Marines was sent to Fallujah. A number of them had their throats cut.





Americans were outraged. Islamic clerics insisted that only Israelis could be so cold-blooded. And who was in charge of US forces in Fallujah at the time? None other than Major General Natonski, the Mossad liaison.



According to Richard Wilson, Israeli sniping and roadside bombs (IEDs) are false flag operations.





He says that on March 28, 2005, Americans arrested Mossad agents who fired twice on a US Marine checkpoint.





In 2005 U.S. Marines arrested 16 members of the Zapata Engineering Security Convoy for firing on Marine guard towers.





The Marines beat up the Mossad agents and tore off their Star-of-David necklaces. (The US media incorrectly said the agents were Americans.) The Mossad agents said they were employees of Zapata Engineering, which is a CIA/Mossad front company that conducts interrogations, and also manages US ammo dumps and US motor pools in Iraq.









Roadside bombs (IEDs) in Iraq are powerful enough to flip over a 70-ton tank.





Some of the models shoot depleted-uranium projectiles, and are triggered by electronic devices surreptitiously planted on US armored vehicles. Zapata Engineering (which employs CIA Mossad agents) makes this exact kind of trigger, and oversees some of the US motor pools.



The Israeli company, Rafael, makes IEDS, which are buried in the middle of a road. On the side of the road is a device which emits a laser or radio signal. This device is manufactured by firms like Zapata Engineering, which is controlled by Zionists/Neo-cons. The IED mine, manufactured by Israel, is inert until a US vehicle (secretly planted with a triggering device) rolls over it.



Whenever The CIA/Mossad carry out these false-flag operations they produce a videotape or a recording from an “unnamed source” that is “close to al-Qaeda.” Sometimes they say “the claim was posted on an Internet website, but its authenticity could not be verified.” These videos have been widely proven to be false andthe CIA has even admitted that they faked Bin-Laden and Saddam Hussein videos.



Mossad/CIA murdered U.S. troops in Iraq



January 21, 2011 by POPEYE





(FEDERALJACK) Back in 2006 a story made its rounds through the internet and the worlds media that Israel snipers were killing U.S. Troops in Iraq and pinning the blame on “insurgents” in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter continued. After a thorough investigation into this older story there is more than enough evidence to point to the fact that Mossad (with the CIA) is operating inside Iraq and has been for years. I used the original material and new updated info that has come out that proves what it says is true. I rewrote the article and sourced it with links to click on and see the original article that backs up each claim or a video showing evidence backing up each claim. My hope is that more people will see this larger, better sourced article and take this more serious than they did the original back in 2006. On October 18, 2006 Anderson Cooper of CNN showed a video of snipers killing U.S. troops in Iraq. CNN says it obtained the video from a “representative” of an unnamed “insurgent leader.” Bear in mind that Anderson Cooper used to work for the CIA. Interesting side note, If you go to Anderson Coopers “blog” and look at Anderson Cooper’s Archives you will see that there is a huge missing gap of video from December 2005 – January 2008. That is two years of missing video reports. Interesting that it happens to be the same time this report aired and the same time that the sectarian violence in Iraq was raging and attacks by “insurgents” on our troops increased in number and brutality.





Screen shot of Anderson Cooper's "blog" (01/22/2011)



Close up of the missing archives on Anderson Cooper's "blog" (01/22/2011)



And remember special forces have been caught pretending to be Arab insurgents running around shooting people in Iraq.



Richard Wilson’s hypothesis: Israeli soldiers and/or Mossad/CIA agents are killing our soldiers in Iraq in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter continues.



At the very beginning of the original (now missing) video clip, you see a rifle with a video camera attached to it. This weapon is made by the Rafael company, an Israeli arms manufacturer, that also makes IEDs. If you watch the video all the way through, it explains how this rifle works. CNN stated that the camera used to film these shootings was not a mounted rifle camera. But as you watch the video, you see that with each shot fired, the camera recoils. That would only happen if it were mounted on the rifle. Why is this significant? Because this kind of rifle-camera is extremely sophisticated and not available to your average Iraqi insurgent. Something this sophisticated points to CIA/Mossad.



The CIA/Mossad are masters at false flag operations, e.g., The Oklahoma City bombing, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, the July 7, the 9/11 attacks in New York & Washington D.C., the assassination of the Prime Minister in Beirut, the bombing of the Hassan al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, Iraq, etc.



Mossad & CIA Agents freely move among US and UK troops in Iraq, and have access to top-level US intelligence. Until July 2003, the head of all US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan was General Tommy Franks, a Zionist NWO lapdog. He was on the board of directors for Bank of America, a position he held until resigning on June 11, 2009 for unspecified reasons but as part of an “exodus” of ten directors from April to August, 2009. On November 7, 2006 another NWO stooge with Zionist beliefs became a principle liaison between Mossad and US forces in Iraq: Major General Richard F. Natonski of the Marine Corps. His title was Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations.



Because of this access, the “insurgents” (i.e., CIA/Mossad agents) know exactly where US vehicles will be and who will be inside them. This allows them to target for maximum false flag effect.



For example, on July 23, 2005, a detachment of 19 female US Marines was sent to Fallujah to check Iraqi women for bombs. An IED blew up their truck. Two of the young American women were killed, five were critically wounded, and four were captured. The bodies of the four captured women turned up later in a garbage dump with their throats cut. Americans were outraged. Islamic clerics insisted that only Israelis could be so cold-blooded. And who was in charge of US forces in Fallujah at the time? None other than Major General Natonski, the Mossad liaison.



Americans are supposed to believe that rag-tag “insurgents” use IEDs powerful enough to kill three US troops per day, on average and flip over up-armored vehicles. An American soldier even set up a blog on how “Intel” is betraying and targeting US troops. The blog has long since been taken down, one can only assume by the Pentagon.



According to Richard Wilson, Israeli sniping and IEDs are false flag operations. He says that on March 28, 2005, Americans arrested Mossad agents who fired twice on a US Marine checkpoint. And indeed In 2005 U.S. Marines arrested 16 members of the Zapata Engineering Security Convoy for firing on Marine guard towers. The Marines beat up the Mossad agents and tore off their Star-of-David necklaces. (The US media incorrectly said the agents were Americans.) The Mossad agents said they were employees of Zapata Engineering, which is a CIA/Mossad front company that conducts interrogations, and also manages US ammo dumps and US motor pools in Iraq.



IEDs in Iraq are powerful enough to flip over a 70-ton tank. Some of the models shoot depleted-uranium projectiles, and are triggered by electronic devices surreptitiously planted on US armored vehicles. Zapata Engineering (which employs CIA & Mossad agents) makes this exact kind of trigger, and oversees some of the US motor pools.



Rumsfeld said the IEDs come from Iran, but Richard said they come from The CIA/Mossad, and are not “improvised” at all. The Israeli company, Rafael, makes IEDS, which are buried in the middle of a road. On the side of the road is a device which emits a laser or radio signal. This device is manufactured by firms like Zapata Engineering, which is controlled by Zionists/Neo-cons. The IED mine, manufactured by Israel, is inert until a US vehicle (secretly planted with a triggering device) rolls over it.



Whenever The CIA/Mossad carry out these false-flag operations they produce a videotape or a recording from an “unnamed source” that is “close to al-Qaeda.” Sometimes they say “the claim was posted on an Internet website, but its authenticity could not be verified.” These videos have been widely proven to be false and the CIA has even admitted that they faked Bin-Laden and Saddam Hussein videos.



We know the CIA is evil but Israel is our ally and would never kill any of our soldiers, sailors, or marines in cold blood, would they? After all, the USS Liberty massacre was “an accident!”



As for the CIA the list is larger than the national debt. One must understand that the CIA & Mossad are controlled at the very top by the same people. The citizens of Israel are being used by their government, and their government is controlled by the Rothschild family. The very same people who control our government. For more information on the U.S.S. Liberty watch the two films below.



DEAD IN THE WATER: The Israeli Attack On The U.S.S. Liberty – (Full Length)





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52U-uXmhJ_M







LOSS OF LIBERTY: The Truth About The U.S.S. Liberty





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgNA7vpb-J8





Sick strategies for senseless slaughter :

The cat is out of the bag now

by John Kaminski

http://www.johnkaminski.com/ May 2005

www.globalresearch.ca 27 May 2005

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KAM505A.html





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It happened quite by accident, as most revelations do. And it is seen by most of the world as the most revolting of the American/Israeli atrocities in the past few years, although it's hard to prioritize that claim because of the level and frequency of barbaric acts that are committed on a regular basis by those affluent automatons who call themselves the good guys.



Yet everyone but the comatose American populace - blinded by its Orwellian media and stupefied by its demented diet of physical and mental poisons - can see it.



So permit me to spell it out for those cowardly people who say they're living in the freest country on Earth, but absolutely refuse in their silent ignorance to see the blood they're spilling. No country that condones deliberate torture for any reason can ever be trusted.



The first hint came in Imad Khadduri's "A warning to car drivers" written in Arabic and posted on www.albasrah.net on May 11 (See.http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KHA505A.html ). The dispatch was quickly picked up by two of the most realistic and reliable news sites on the Web,www.uruknet.info , which I try to read every day, and www.globalresearch.ca , which I try to read every week, since it offers less breaking and more analytical news. I consider these two sites essential to keeping up with the real news of the world, and highly recommend that you monitor them, too.



Khadduri recounted a scam that opens up a clear window to seeing who is perpetrating all this inexplicable violence in Iraq. Beyond the American attempt to pacify an outraged and abused nation through demonic destruction, and beyond the Iraqi attempt to resist this totalitarian takeover by a foreign conqueror, there are more than numerous acts of violence that simply can't be understood by straightforward explanations.



I mean, when a mosque blows up and Americans blame Islamic terrorists, whether Sunni or Shiite, it makes no sense. Muslims never blow up their own houses of worship. Or when reporters sympathetic to either the Iraqi cause of freedom, or even just general principles of international justice, are suddenly assassinated and the blame is placed on often imaginary Islamic extremists whose perspective is supported by these writers, how can anyone believe that Muslims did it, even thought this is what the Zionist American press and government continue to insist.



So who's doing all these demented deeds? As if we didn't know ....



Khadduri's report went like this:

"A few days ago, an American manned check point confiscated the driver license of a driver and told him to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license. The next day, the driver did visit the camp and he was allowed in the camp with his car. He was admitted to a room for an interrogation that lasted half an hour. At the end of the session, the American interrogator told him: 'OK, there is nothing against you, but you do know that Iraq is now sovereign and is in charge of its own affairs. Hence, we have forwarded your papers and license to al-Kadhimia police station for processing. Therefore, go there with this clearance to reclaim your license. At the police station, ask for Lt. Hussain Mohammed, who is waiting for you now. Go there now quickly, before he leaves his shift work". (http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KHA505A.html )



The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.



The only feasible explanation for this incident is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad. The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated "hideous attack by foreign elements".



The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the north of Iraq. A car was confiscated along with the driver's license. He did follow up on the matter and finally reclaimed his car but was told to go to a police station to reclaim his license. Fortunately for him, the car broke down on the way to the police station. The inspecting car mechanic discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with explosives."



If this were the only example of this type I heard, I might have let it pass as just a story. But it wasn't.



There was also the sorry tale of the Iraqi man who saw American soldiers plant a bomb which shortly thereafter exploded, and when he said so out loud for all to hear, he was hauled away, never to be seen again.



This story was reported on arguably the most authentic and riveting source of news from Iraq, the heart-rending "Baghdad Burning: Girl Blog from Iraq," which is compiled by someone known only as Riverbend or Iraqi Girl. Again, recommended reading.



She recounts,

"the last two weeks have been violent .... The number of explosions in Baghdad alone is frightening. There have also been several assassinations - bodies being found here and there. It's somewhat disturbing to know that corpses are turning up in the most unexpected places. Many people will tell you its not wise to eat river fish anymore because they have been nourished on the human remains being dumped into the river. That thought alone has given me more than one sleepless night. It is almost as if Baghdad has turned into a giant graveyard.



The latest corpses were those of some Sunni and Shia clerics - several of them well-known. People are being patient and there is a general consensus that these killings are being done to provoke civil war. Also worrisome is the fact that we are hearing of people being rounded up by security forces (Iraqi) and then being found dead days later - apparently when the new Iraqi government recently decided to reinstate the death penalty, they had something else in mind.



But back to the explosions. One of the larger blasts was in an area called Ma'moun, which is a middle class area located in west Baghdad. It's a relatively calm residential area with shops that provide the basics and a bit more. It happened in the morning, as the shops were opening up for their daily business and it occurred right in front of a butcher's shop. Immediately after, we heard that a man living in a house in front of the blast site was hauled off by the Americans because it was said that after the bomb went off, he sniped an Iraqi National Guardsman.



I didn't think much about the story - nothing about it stood out: an explosion and a sniper - hardly an anomaly. The interesting news started circulating a couple of days later. People from the area claim that the man was taken away not because he shot anyone, but because he knew too much about the bomb. Rumor has it that he saw an American patrol passing through the area and pausing at the bomb site minutes before the explosion. Soon after they drove away, the bomb went off and chaos ensued. He ran out of his house screaming to the neighbors and bystanders that the Americans had either planted the bomb or seen the bomb and done nothing about it. He was promptly taken away.



The bombs are mysterious. Some of them explode in the midst of National Guard and near American troops or Iraqi Police and others explode near mosques, churches, and shops or in the middle of sougs. One thing that surprises us about the news reports of these bombs is that they are inevitably linked to suicide bombers. The reality is that some of these bombs are not suicide bombs - they are car bombs that are either being remotely detonated or maybe time bombs. All we know is that the techniques differ and apparently so do the intentions. Some will tell you they are resistance. Some say Chalabi and his thugs are responsible for a number of them. Others blame Iran and the SCIRI militia Badir.



In any case, they are terrifying. If you're close enough, the first sound is a that of an earsplitting blast and the sounds that follow are of a rain of glass, shrapnel and other sharp things. Then the wails begin - the shrill mechanical wails of an occasional ambulance combined with the wail of car alarms from neighboring vehiclesŠ and finally the wail of people trying to sort out their dead and dying from the debris.



Then there was this one.



On May 13, 2005, a 64 years old Iraqi farmer, Haj Haidar Abu Sijjad, took his tomato load in his pickup truck from Hilla to Baghdad, accompanied by Ali, his 11 years old grandson. They were stopped at an American check point and were asked to dismount. An American soldier climbed on the back of the pickup truck, followed by another a few minutes later, and thoroughly inspected the tomato filled plastic containers for about 10 minutes. Haj Haidar and his grandson were then allowed to proceed to Baghdad.



A minute later, his grandson told him that he saw one of the American soldiers putting a grey melon size object in the back among the tomato containers. The Haj immediately slammed on the brakes and stopped the car at the side of the road, at a relatively far distance from the check point. He found a time bomb with the clock ticking tucked among his tomatoes. He immediately recognized it, as he was an ex-army soldier. Panicking, he grabbed his grandson and ran away from the car. Then, realizing that the car was his only means of work, he went back, took the bomb and carried it in fear. He threw it in a deep ditch by the side of the road that was dug by Iraqi soldiers in preparation for the war, two years ago.



Upon returning from Baghdad, he found out that the bomb had indeed exploded, killing three sheep and injuring their shepherd in his head. He thanked God for giving him the courage to go back and remove the bomb, and for the luck in that the American soldiers did not notice his sudden stop at a distance and his getting rid of the bomb.



"They intended it to explode in Baghdad and claim that it is the work of the 'terrorists', or 'insurgents' or who call themselves the 'Resistance'.



I decided to expose them and asked your reporter to take me to Baghdad to tell you the story. They are to be exposed as they now want to sow strife in Iraq and taint the Resistance after failing to defeat it militarily.



Do not forget to mention my name. I fear nobody but God, as I am a follower of Muqtada al-Sadir." (http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/ )





The background and admission of guilt for such satanic shenanigans was clearly outlined in Frank Morales' piece on globalresearch.ca: "The Provocateur State: Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi 'Insurgents' - and Global Terrorism, " by Frank Morales clearly demonstrates how Donald Rumsfeld said he was going to do exactly what these three sorry episodes show he actually did.



Morales writes:



Back in 2002, following the trauma of 9-11, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld predicted there would be more terrorist attacks against the American people and civilization at large. How could he be so sure of that? Perhaps because these attacks would be instigated on the order of the Honorable Mr. Rumsfeld. According to Los Angeles Times military analyst William Arkin, writing Oct. 27, 2002, Rumsfeld set out to create a secret army, "a super-Intelligence Support Activity" network that would "bring together CIA and military covert action, information warfare, intelligence, and cover and deception," to stir the pot of spiraling global violence.( http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html )



We never got the full story on those ghastly beheadings of Nick Berg and others. Nor have we ever understood who killed the American mercenaries in Fallujah that eventually precipitated one of the great slaughters in history. Nor have we ever been able to discern if Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is actually a real person or just another bin Ladenesque boogeyman. Nor if the al-Qaeda website which claims responsibility for various atrocities is not really run by the CIA.



Provoking this type of violence also further conceals the sinister genocide the Israelis continue to perpetrate on the hapless Palestinians, which is exactly its point, as is the entire Iraq invasion and destruction, and as was the inside job mass murder on 9/11 in New York City. The purpose of all these despicable acts is to conceal what the Israelis and the Americans have been doing all along to the entire Arab world, namely enslaving and destroying it.





There is not now nor ever was an Arab terror threat. That was all invented by Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Brzezinski, Bush, Cheney, Sharon, Zakheim, Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrams and Warren Buffett. These people are all traitors to not only their countries but to humanity in general, and should all be slammed and RICOed into Guantanamo immediately.



And so should the government officials, media lackeys, and ordinary citizens who, by their complicity or their ignorance, support them.



The main point in understanding these deliberate provocations to prevent peace is to understand how the American capitalist system, now hijacked by billionaires with no trace of conscience, thrives on war and profits from the misery of others.



The neocon murder menace has been for months ratcheting up the hyperbole about why we need to invade Iran - which some predict will happen in June - and just this week, rumors of troop movements in the Caribbean and lockdowns at Florida military bases appear to augur an imminent invasion of oil-producing Venezuela.



The overall plan is to create hell on Earth, and we are succeeding. By our silent complicity and cowardly reluctance to oppose and stop this homicidal behavior in the name of profit, we are all accessories to mass murder and the destruction of human society, not to even mention the extinction of individual human freedom and the God-given right to be safe and secure in the homes of our choice.



So now that you know, what are you going to do about it? You know if you do nothing, these same things will one day happen to you.









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------





















25.04.2012
00:00

Wayne MADSEN

Strategic-Culture.org





18 - George Soros’s and the Neo-Cons’ Control of Washington’s Propaganda Program

An examination of the current 2013 budget for the U.S. government’s Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) that oversees the International Broadcasting Board (IBB) and which determines the slant taken by the U.S. government’s propaganda efforts on radio, television, and, increasingly on the Internet, illustrates the head-lock that George Soros and neo-conservative “soft power projection” interests have on the official state-sponsored information disseminated by the U.S. government to a global audience.



The new propaganda bias of such IBB-controlled outlets such as the Voice of America, Radio Free Asia, and Radio Free Europe should comes as no surprise, considering that former CNN chairman and chief executive officer Walter Isaacson laid down the gauntlet after he assumed the chairmanship of the Broadcasting Board of Governors in 2009 by calling for the United States to aggressively challenge what he termed anti-American “propaganda” emanating from such international broadcasters as RT (the former Russia Today), Iran’s Press TV, and China’s CCTV. Isaacson walks in lock-step with the goals of Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations as the head of the politically-connected Aspen Institute. Isaacson stepped down from his broadcasting chairmanship position in January 2012.



The priorities for U.S. propaganda include stepping up efforts to effect political change in what are termed the five remaining “Communist” countries in the world through Cold War-era dissemination of “news” and other content via the Voice of America (VOA), the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) , and “grantee” organizations RFE/RL (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty), Inc., and Radio Free Asia (RFA). Soros’s Open Society Institute holds a predominant role in the administration of the “grantee” broadcast arms, which were originally operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) before de facto control was passed to Soros after the collapse of communism in Europe. The targeted five remaining communist nations are China, Cuba, North Korea, Laos, and Vietnam.



The BBG claims that America’s propaganda efforts reach a global audience of 187 million people and that the 59 language broadcasts to over 100 nations costs less than a mere $5 million per year. The BBG budget request contains all the Soros code phrases in describing America’s “highest standards of journalistic independence, ethics, and objectivity” and support of “democracy, civil society, and transparent institutions around the world.”



While the U.S. propaganda broadcasts emphasize “transparency” for governments around the world, the Obama administration has been one of the most opaque administrations in recent memory. The indictment of six former U.S. intelligence and military personnel for communicating, directly or indirectly, alleged classified information to journalists in violation of the arcane 1917 Espionage Act is unprecedented for any administration since the law was enacted during World War I. The six individuals indicted or convicted are – the National Security Agency’s Thomas Drake, the CIA’s Jeffrey Sterling and John Kiriakou, the U.S. Army’ Bradley Manning, the FBI Hebrew translator Shamai Liebowitz, and the State Department’s Steven Kim. The New York Times’s James Risen is fighting a subpoena by a federal grand jury to name his CIA source or sources on the agency’s nuclear spying operations directed against Iran. Other journalists and their sources are also facing aggressive investigations by U.S. intelligence agencies, the FBI, and the Justice Department.



With a draconian and restrictive American approach to openness and freedom of information, the United States propaganda effort is aimed at bringing pressure on various governments around the world to open up their own political structures to increased scrutiny.



The BBG’s vision for the United States to control the full spectrum of international news broadcasting is spelled out in its visionary statement in its latest budget request: “the BBG’s core strategic goal is to become the world’s leading international news agency focused on our mission and impact – i.e., to reach key audiences in support of free, open, democratic societies. The agency’s principal performance goal is to reach 216 million in global weekly audience by 2016.” One of the U.S. government’s goals is to launch a “Global News Network.” To carry out this goal, the BBG foresees an aggressive program that will: “combat Internet censorship and jamming, elevate and expand social media innovation, and employ leading-edge communication techniques and technologies.”



The propaganda efforts mirror those previously and currently being carried out by Soros’s, the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy’s (NED), and U.S. Institute for Peace’s efforts to utilize social networking technologies such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, podcasts, mobile phone instant messaging, on-line chats, Android and I-Phone applications, and micro-blogs to stage “themed revolutions” in Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, and other countries. The BBG has called for an expansion of the U.S. government’s propaganda reach by using all the aforementioned technologies.



The propaganda effort, according to the outlined BBG policy and goals include increasing television broadcasts directed at Egypt and central Asia. Although the BBG sees television, the web, and social networks as new avenues for dissemination of propaganda, current shortwave and medium wave radio broadcasts will be continued in programming directed at “Cuba, China, North Korea, Burma, Iran, Tibet, Uyghur, FATA (Afghan-Pakistan border region), Pakistan, Afghanistan, Belarusian, Russian to the Caucasus, Russian, Turkmen, Khmer, and Africa.”



The U.S. will continue to finance and expand the reach of a number of radio stations targeting certain countries where the United States is attempting to overthrow existing anti-American governments, maintain existing American surrogate governments, or influence the overall political situation through “soft power” projection. These stations include Radio Free Europe’s/Radio Liberty’s Radio Farda that broadcasts Persian programming into Iran; Radio Free Afghanistan and its Pashto and Dari services; Radio Mashaal, which broadcasts Pashto programs into the Afghanistan-Pakistan region; Radio Free Iraq and its Arabic broadcasts; and the North Caucasus Unit that broadcasts in Avar, Chechen, and Circassian. In addition the Voice of America will continue its TV and Radio Ashna, targeting Afghanistan in Pashto; Radio Deewa, directed at Afghanistan in Pashto; Kurdish service targeting the Kurdish regions of Iraq, Turkey, Iran, and Syria; Radio Azzatyq directed to Kazakhstan; Radio Azzatyk directed to Kyrgyzstan; and Radio Europa Libera directed to Moldova.



The U.S. will also continue to maintain its Arabic television and radio broadcasts via Alhurra, Alhurra Iraq, Radio Sawa, and Afia Darfur. In addition to radio, Twitter, Facebook, Google, Yandex, and YouTube offerings will be increased in the Arabic, Persian, Urdu, Kurdish, Russian, Belarusian, Avar, Chechen, Circassian, Tatar-Bashkir (Radio Azatliq), Ukraine (Radio Svoboda), Albanian, Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese, Uyghur, Tibetan, Korean, Burmese, Indonesian, Thai, Haitian Creole, Hausa, French for Africa, Amharic, Afaan Oromoo, Tigrigna, Somali, Swahili, Shona, Ndbele, Kinyarwanda, and Kirundi efforts. The BBG admits that it instituted “surge broadcasting” to support the Soros-financed “Saffron Revolution” in Burma in late 2007.



The BBG intends to counteract Russian government influence in central Asia by broadcasting via direct-to-home satellite television programs to counteract “Russian-language media – much of it controlled by Moscow” that presents what the BBG considers are “consistently anti-Western messages.” Particular targets for this direct satellite and Livestream television propaganda are Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.



Direct satellite transmissions and web offerings will also be increased in the Urdu, Lao, Khmer, Tibetan, and Vietnamese languages. Radio Free Asia will also increase FM radio broadcasts from border stations in Thailand to Laos. The Office of Cuba Broadcasting Radio and TV Marti programs from Miami will expand its use of stringers in Latin America to file radio, television, and web reports from various Latin American locations for the Cuban audience.



In some cases, the BBG seeks to place U.S. propaganda television and radio programs, called “”interactive segments” and produced by such entities as the Voice of America’s Bangla Service, within domestic broadcasts in media-intensive countries like Bangladesh. Other U.S. segment placement utilizing local broadcasters is carried out in Greek for stations in Athens, Nicosia and in Serbian for “over fifty” television affiliates in Serbia, and in Indonesia for over 230 affiliate radio stations in Indonesia. Another target for such segment “placement” is Turkey, which is described by the BBG as a crowded and competitive media market that “shows increasing anti-American bias and a growing appeal for Islamic audiences.”



The BBG claims that the Voice of America has been successful in the placement of programming in the Balkans by establishing “firm positions on local TV outlets in Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia.” Voice of America now maintains new broadcast transmitting stations in Benghazi and Tripoli, Hargeisa (the capital of the internationally unrecognized Republic of Somaliland), Bangui, Afghanistan, and the United Arab Emirates and newly-refurbished transmitter stations in Sao Tome, Bangkok, Kuwait, Tinian, Saipan, and Sri Lanka.



As the United States cracks down on the freedom of the press at home it is increasing its propaganda efforts abroad. Such are the hallmarks of an empire, caught in its own death throes of rapidly fading global importance, which attempts to maintain its power and influence, regardless of its poor image or the costs.



In what amounts to a new “Cold War” in the battle for minds and opinions, other world broadcasters should face the reality of a new and aggressive U.S. propaganda onslaught. The countermeasures to such a program cannot be to provide television (including YouTube spots) and radio presentations featuring individuals and organizations directly supported financially and otherwise by the Soros/U.S. government “themed revolution” provocateurs and policy water carriers. Particular caution should be exercised by international broadcasters headquartered in Moscow, Beijing, Doha, Dubai, Caracas, Tokyo, Seoul, Hanoi, Paris, London, Berlin, and Ankara. And that definitely includes, first and foremost, RT and CCTV.











World War III Has Begun – It`s the First Asymmetric War Long Awaited by Pentagon Think Tanks

The Pentagon has already declared World War III and President Barack Obama and the Congress never even carried out their constitutional duties to approve the use of American military power for war.



One might reasonably conclude that the United States has outsourced war. Presently, World War III is being conducted on two continents – Asia and Africa – with two others – Europe and South America – looming on the horizon. Today, wars are crafted by the upper one percent of wealthy elitists who, using non-governmental organizations, television networks, non — profit “think tanks,” and public relations firms, can declare war on nations without a whimper from elected public officials.



Symmetric warfare is no longer an option for the global elites. World Wars I and II severely affected the investments of many of the global elite families as a result of the destruction of cities, factories, railways, seaports, and other infrastructures. The Korean, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli, and Iraq wars were messy affairs that also adversely affected markets and destroyed valuable infrastructures. The Cold War never developed into a hot nuclear war because of the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which ensured that a nuclear first strike by either the West or the East would result in total annihilation of both sides, along with the rest of the world. Even a western military attack on China would have had disastrous results for the attackers, especially since China could retaliate with a nuclear counter-attack and wipe out the U.S. Seventh Fleet and its East Asian naval bases, including Okinawa and Guam. A new type of warfare was required by the elites: asymmetric warfare – the use of unconventional warfare tactics, including information warfare, by proxies, non-state actors, agents provocateur, and fifth columns.



Largely financed by hedge fund mega-tycoon George Soros and his Central Intelligence Agency interlocutors, our present asymmetric World War III was field tested just like any new product. The “themed” revolutions were market-tested first in Serbia, and then in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan, to oust problematic governments that did not want to get on board with the dictates of the unelected and unaccountable real controllers of the financial and political destiny of the world.



Pro-western and pro-European Union governments, comprised of a number of individuals who were funded by Soros and other non-state operations established by the global elites, for example, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, Freedom House, U.S. Institute of Peace, and others funded and supported by the Houses of Rothschild, Rockefeller, Mellon, and others saw to it that new governments took root in Belgrade, Kiev, Tbilisi, and Bishkek. These new governments were not elected but took power as a result of themed street rebellions, a new manifestation of unconventional warfare.



No longer did armies, navies, and air forces have to face each other across battlefields and battle zones and theaters of warfare. One merely had to embed fifth columnists and provocateurs inside a targeted nation's capital city, media, political party apparatus, and "civil society" infrastructure to bring about the defeat of the government outside the normal political process and replace it with a new government beholden to the desires of the central banks and global oligarchs.



The beginnings of the asymmetric world war began in Belgrade, Serbia when Otpor – a Serbian resistance movement dedicated to overthrowing the Slobodon Milosevic regime – launched the first “themed revolution.” Otpor’s symbol was a clenched fist, an emblem that would reappear in the future in other capital cities from Kiev to Cairo. Otpor received massive funding from a network of western contrivances, including George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the neo-conservative-infiltrated U.S. National Endowment for Democracy, and various European Union-funded NGOs that were intimately linked to Soros’s “democracy engineering” operations.



The playbook used for Otpor in Serbia and by similar organizations in toppling the governments of Georgia in the Rose Revolution, Ukraine in the Orange Revolution, and Kyrgyzstan in the Tulip Revolution, was developed by University of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the founder of the Boston-based NGO, the Albert Einstein Institute, which helped train Otpor activists in civil disobedience and popular resistance campaigns designed to overthrow governments, those democratically-elected and those not. Albert Einstein Institute-trained provocateurs launched popular resistance campaigns around the world aimed at replacing governments unwilling to acquiesce to the dictates of Western elites. Internal opposition forces, all acolytes of Sharp, for instance Kmara, which helped install the pro-Western and pro-Israeli Mikheil Saakashvili in Georgia; Pora in Ukraine that propelled pro-NATO Viktor Yushchenko into the presidency; and KelKel in Kyrgyzstan that replaced Askar Akayev with the corrupt Kurmanbek Bakiyev.



The domino effect of the themed revolutions saw Serbs helping to overthrow the Georgian government, then Serbs and Georgians flocking to Kiev to oust the Ukrainian government, and Georgians and Ukrainians being directly involved in the insurrection in Bishkek. The neo-conservatives and Sharp had borrowed a page from the Communists and the international proletarian movement that saw Communist cadres fight against capitalists and fascists in foreign civil wars, for example, the Spanish Civil War and conflicts in Africa and Southeast Asia.



Sharp was an alumnus of Harvard University’s CIA-linked Center for International Affairs, also abbreviated “CIA,” which is not coincidental. Harvard and the CIA of Langley, Virginia have long maintained a close relationship. In fact, Sharp was never interested in ensuring the will of the people to map out their own future but was putting into practice the theory of asymmetric warfare – the vanquishing of enemies through the use of proxy internal forces without the requirement for invading foreign armies and the massive death and destruction associated with such action.



Many of Sharp’s tactics have been seen in practice in many asymmetric warfare targets. These include the creation of a perception of a successful movement, even if there is not one. The use of western-controlled news networks like Fox News that showed a video clip of anti-austerity Greek rioters in Athens falsely depicted as anti-government protesters in Moscow and Al Jazeera’s use of a video erroneously showing a U.S.- and Saudi-backed bloody crackdown of pro-democracy protesters by Bahrain’s security forces as the bloody repression of protesters by Syria’s government are examples of Sharp’s propaganda and disinformation tactics.



Cultivating foreign support is another key element of Sharp’s asymmetric warfare tactics. The virtual control exercised by Soros over Human Rights Watch after the multi-billionaire hedge fund kingpin donated $100 million to the group is a case in point. The human rights NGO was at the forefront of hyping “atrocities” committed by the Qaddafi regime in Libya but remained largely silent on Libyan rebel atrocities committed against Libyan and African blacks, as well as Qaddafi loyalists. In so doing, Human Rights Watch had a powerful accomplice in the International Criminal Court, which tended to look the other way when CIA- and Saudi- and Qatari’ supported Libyan rebels were committing the massacres.



Another Sharp tactic is to seek change outside the electoral system. This tactic was evident in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, where election results were rejected, and in the recent Russian parliamentary election, where Soros- and U.S. neocon-financed election monitoring groups like Golos rejected the outcome of the election and used shills like former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev to call for the nullification of the election. Interference following the Sharp and Soros methodology can also be seen in the presidential candidacies of Russian oligarch and New Jersey Nets basketball owner Mikhail Prokhorov and the backing by western propaganda outlets like the Christian Science Monitor (now derided as the “Christian Zionist Monitor” after its takeover by interests who favor a neo-imperialist U.S. foreign policy) of Moscow street protest veteran Alexei Navalny.



Sharp and Soros are on the same page in calling for the internal opposition forces’ use of the Internet, fax, and social networks like Facebook and Twitter to advance their agendas.



In the next phases of World War III, the asymmetric warriors of the Pentagon and their adjunct non-state actors will continue to turn up the heat in the Arab World, with the revolutions in Libya, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen, and Egypt, after a somewhat shaky start that saw the advancement of Islamist groups, being brought under more western and NATO control. Russia’s presidential election and a turndown in the Chinese economy, with growing village-based dissent among China’s growing middle class, will present further opportunities for the promoters of World War III. The sudden death of North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Il has also resulted in a call for an expansion of social networking operations, most notably by the CIA- and Soros-infested Washington Post, inside Asia’s hermit kingdom.



Myanmar, China’s restive provinces of Tibet and East Turkestan, Lebanon, Iran, Algeria, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Nepal, Belarus, Ecuador, Bolivia, Pakistan, Laos, and the two Congos also present opportunities for the World War III architects. Those who seek to extend American and global elitist control over the entire planet will not rest until every acre of land comes under the firm control of the oligarchs of Wall Street, the spymasters of the CIA, and the globalist business cartels and families.







Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



















19 - A String of Political Assassinations and the US Military Presence

In March, 2009, US President B. Obama announced a plan to withdraw the US forces from Afghanistan in 2011-2014. In the meantime, though, the US troops in the country grew in size to reach 100,000 by the spring of 2011, and the actual preparations for the withdrawal began in February, 2011 after US Vice President J. Biden's Kabul tour which marked a pivotal point in Washington's relations with Afghanistan.



A series of developments that took place over the past several months in Afghanistan added uncertainties to the situation around the US withdrawal from the country. The US special forces killed Usama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, on May 2, 2011, but the raid triggered a string of political assassinations in Afghanistan. Afghanistan's deputy police minister Gen. Mohammed Daoud Daoud who was in charge of counter-narcotics operations died in a suicide attack on May 28. An investigation conducted by Afghan law-enforcement agencies showed that the kamikaze in the case was a militant from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan which is notorious for close links with Al Qaeda. Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of Afghan president H. Karzai and Kandahar Provincial Council chairman, was shot dead by his own bodyguard on July 12. The victim had a spotty reputation and was known to run the province as a completely lawless territory. He was widely suspected of maintaining ties with the drug mafia, illegally seizing lands to rent them out to Western companies, and distorting the outcome of the 2009 presidential elections in the southern part of Afghanistan. The Talibs claimed responsibility for the murder of A. Karzai, but no official version of the incident was released, prompting speculations about numerous players that stood to benefit from the plot. Afghanistan's former president Prof. Burhanuddin Rabbani was killed on September, 20. Rabbani led the opposition in the Afghan parliament and chaired the country's Consultative Peace Jirga, a body established to draw the Talibs into reconciliation talks. The murder of Rabbani, for which Jalaluddin Haqqani's group of insurgents declared being responsible, was a clear attempt to derail the negotiating process, to cause a broad escalation in Afghanistan, and to reignite the conflict between the Afghan Tajiks and the northern minorities supporting them, on the one side, and the Pashtuns, on the other. Afghan president H. Karzai stated on September 29 that he would not deal with the Talibs and would switch to Pakistan as the negotiating partner.



The Talibs similarly target the US forces in Afghanistan. On September 11, roughly when President Obama indicated he was open to negotiations with the insurgents, a blast shattered a US military base in the Wardak Province, injuring 77 US servicemen. On September 22, the US embassy in Kabul came under attack which US ambassador R. Crocker attributed to Haqqani's group.



The conclusion stemming from the above survey is that the insurgents in Afghanistan managed to retain considerable military potential. Keeping the Afghan government and its Western partners at gunpoint, they make the latter expedite the withdrawal in the hope to impose their terms on the former in the negotiations which they have preferred to avoid so far.



Under the circumstances, Washington chose to offer H. Karzai a deal defining the format and status of the US presence in Afghanistan following the pledged withdrawal. While President Obama is facing public pressure to complete the pullout as quickly as possible (mid-summer polls showed that 56% of the US population opposed further stay of the US forces in Afghanistan), H. Karzai and his administration are increasingly vocal about their worries that, absent the West's military support, the country would easily revert to the state of civil war and re-emerge as a source of a regional threat.



A new strategic US-Afghan partnership agreement was on the table during the talks which opened in March, 2011, part of the purpose being to enable the US military and civilian specialists and formations – the US intelligence operatives, air force, etc. - to work in Afghanistan after 2014. Kabul rejected the US draft agreement citing its loose wording and suggested a detailed alternative, the key point being that the US servicemen in Afghanistan would have to obey the Afghan legislation. Karzai's foreign-policy adviser Dr. Rangin Dadfar Spanta stressed that there should be no parallel arrangements and the parameters of the deal must fit fully with Afghanistan's constitution. Karzai said in April he would convene the loya jirga to hold debates over Afghanistan's strategic partnership with the US. The US-Afghan talks resumed in June, but the lengthy discussions failed to produce a document both sides could subscribe to.



One of the issues over which, by the way, the Afghan administration is divided, is the future of the military bases where the US forces are currently deployed. Slain A. Karzai held that allowing the US to operate the bases on a permanent basis would shield Afghanistan from its potentially intrusive neighbors. The ranks of current proponents of the view include Afghanistan's defense minister Abdul Rahim Wardak, former vice president Ahmad Zia Massoud, former national security chief Amrullah Saleh, and former police minister Hanif Atmar. In contrast, the position taken by Afghan military commander and first vice president Field Marshal Mohammad Qasim Fahim is that the whole nation must be invited to a debate on the issue.



The problem of the status of the US military bases in Afghanistan already evokes serious concerns in the neighboring countries. Tehran came up with a strong statement against the perpetuation of the existence of US military bases in Iran's proximity. Russia, India, and China also sent a message to Kabul that the idea was not to their liking.



Overall, the US withdrawal began under challenging conditions, and Washington is leaving Afghanistan with a bulk of unresolved problems. The Talibs and their allies are still strong in the country, and the military methods on which G. Bush's Administration relied heavily have proved inefficient. As a result, Washington simply has to talk to the Talibs, but uncertainties abound down the road as it is impossible to predict what exactly awaits Afghanistan in the wake of the US withdrawal. Pervasive corruption, rampant drug trafficking, untamed power of warlords and organized criminal groups, and outrageous levels of unemployment are parts of the picture across today's Afghanistan.



It may be a realistic hypothesis that the US withdrawal from Afghanistan is not going to be total: the combat forces are back to the US, but the US military presence in the country is bound to persist. The October, 2011 tour of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan by US Secretary of State H. Clinton provided evidence that seems to reinforce the view. The complexity of H. Clinton's mission peaked in Islamabad where she tried to cool the tensions between the US and Pakistan caused by the raid during which bin Laden was gunned down (the operation was seen in Pakistan as an offense against its sovereignty). H. Clinton credited Pakistan with playing a key role in the Afghan settlement and urged it to both crack down on its home extremists and to contribute to stabilizing Afghanistan.



When H. Clinton was in Kabul, the theme was the bilateral strategic agreement promised by B. Obama and H. Karzai back in May, 2010. As before, no compromise was reached on the terms of lease of the Afghan military bases to the US following 2014.



The subjects of H. Clinton's talks in Dushanbe and Tashkent – the involvement of the Central Asian republics in the reconstruction of Afghanistan, human rights, and religious freedoms - were essentially traditional. A fresh idea that was thrown and then given the key line on the agenda of the November 2, Istanbul conference eloquently titled Security and Cooperation in the Heart of Asia was to create a modern edition of the historic Silky Way. The forum attracted delegations from Russia, Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, China, India, Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia.



The implementation of the new Silky Way plan, upon scrutiny, would help the US to preserve political and other types of dominance in the region after the 2014 completion of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and would enable Washington to sideline in it Russia, China, and the increasingly assertive Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The impression is that the design is an updated version of G. Bush's Greater Central Asia plan which, despite being renamed, reflects the US pursuit of the same objective of gaining direct access to the region's natural resources via routes bypassing Russia. As an addition, Washington is making efforts to get NATO entrenched in Central Asia.



The US plan, though, appeared doomed to failure from the outset. Pakistan said a fairly firm No to it, as focusing on the already formulated development and security programs would be wiser than inventing extra cooperation mechanisms. Russia, China, and Iran expressed similar reservations. The main result at the bottom line of the Istanbul conference seems to be that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization intends to expand at an accelerated pace by integrating India and Pakistan as full-fledged members.



As for the US withdrawal, it will likely render more challenging the security problem confronting Afghanistan and its neighbors rather than bring about its viable resolution.







Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.















25.04.2012

News

Strategic-Culture.org





Philippines, U.S. stage war games in face of China warning

Hundreds of American and Philippine troops waded ashore on Wednesday in a mock assault to retake a small island in energy-rich waters disputed with China, a drill Beijing had said would raise the risk of armed conflict.



The exercises, part of annual U.S.-Philippine war games on the western island of Palawan, coincide with another standoff between Chinese and Philippine vessels near Scarborough Shoal in a different part of the South China Sea.



China has territorial disputes with the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan across the South China Sea, each searching for gas and oil while building up their navies and military alliances.



China said last week the drill would raise the risk of confrontation. On Wednesday, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai said China was committed to dialogue and diplomacy to resolve the dispute.



“We are certainly worried about the South China Sea issue,” Cui told a news briefing in Beijing, saying “some people tried to mix two unrelated things, territorial sovereignty and freedom of navigation”.



The comments come before high-level talks with the Obama administration. China, which claims the South China Sea based on historical records, has sought to resolve disputes bilaterally but its neighbours worry over what some see as growing Chinese assertiveness in its claims in the region.



“Location (of the drill) is irrelevant,” Ensign Bryan Mitchell, spokesman for the U.S. Marines, told reporters.



“These exercises take place on a regular basis. This year it happens to be in Palawan. The planning for this took place months ago prior to any events that are currently in the headlines.”



U.S. President Barack Obama has sought to reassure regional allies that Washington would serve as a counterbalance to China in the South China Sea, part of his campaign to “pivot” U.S. foreign policy towards Asia after wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Philippine military officials sought to play down the exercise. Lieutenant General Juancho Sabban, military commander for the western Philippines, said the drill “simply means we want to work together, improve our skills”.



Sabban’s area of command includes Reed Bank and the Spratlys, a group of 250 mostly uninhabitable islets spread over 427,350 sq km (165,000 sq miles) west of Palawan.



The Spratlys are claimed entirely by China, Taiwan and Vietnam and in part by Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines.



HUGE OIL, GAS RESERVES



Proven and undiscovered oil reserve estimates in the South China Sea range as high as 213 billion barrels of oil, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in a 2008 report. That would surpass every country’s proven oil reserves except Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, according to the BP Statistical Review.



A Philippine exploration firm, Philex Petroleum Corp, said on Tuesday its unit, Forum Energy Plc, had found more natural gas than expected around Reed Bank, where Chinese navy vessels tried to ram one of Forum Energy’s survey ships last year.



The Philippines is due to open oil-and-gas exploration bids in Reed Bank on Friday.



Vietnam reasserted its claim to the Spratlys and the Paracel islands, known in Chinese as the Xisha islands, further west of Scarborough Shoal in what it calls the East Sea.



Self-ruled Taiwan, which China considers a renegade province, reiterated its claims over territories in the South China Sea and urged “countries concerned to exercise self-restraint so that peaceful resolutions can be reached through consultation”.



“CHINA SHOULD NOT BE WORRIED”



Sabban said the military drill was not focused on China.



“Never was China ever mentioned in our planning and execution,” he told reporters. “China should not be worried about Balikatan (shoulder-to-shoulder) exercises.”



Nearly 7,000 American and Philippine troops were launched from U.S. and Philippine ships in the simulated amphibious assault to recapture an island supposedly taken by militants.



Commandos came ashore from U.S. and Philippine ships in a simulated amphibious assault to recapture an island supposedly taken by militants.



Jumping from rubber boats as they hit the shore, the commandos engaged in a mock firefight, making their way inch by inch from the beach to a navy facility to rescue “hostages” and recapture the base.



Four days ago, commando teams rappelled from U.S. helicopters and landed from rubber boats in a mock assault to retake an oil rig in northern Palawan, 18 km (11 miles) off the town of El Nido on the South China Sea.



The annual war games come under the 1951 Mutual Defence Treaty, part of a web of security alliances the United States built in the Asia-Pacific region during the Cold War.



The drills are a rehearsal of a mutual defence plan by the two allies to repel any aggression in the Philippines.



Hundreds of kilometres to the north, a Philippine coast guard ship patrols near Scarborough Shoal, a group of half-submerged rock formations 124 nautical miles west of the Philippines’ main island of Luzon.



Philippine and Chinese ships are often in the same areas of the South China Sea, with two Chinese maritime surveillance ships a few miles away from the coast guard vessel and five Chinese fishing boats working the waters nearby.



euronews







-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







24.04.2012

Carlos Pereyra MELE

Strategic-Culture.org





20 - 'Humanitarian' Base of the US Southern Command in Chaco Province of Argentina : Sleeping with the Enemy

This is the alternative we are confronted to by the former national senator and current Governor of Chaco province, Jorge Capitanich, being him for a couple of years the stoker of a «new strategic alliance with USA» (as he mentioned), and which today begins to clearly show its results as the first South military base has just been settled in Argentina, on the basis of a harmless argument of a humanitarian base to be of help under natural catastrophes situations. The official website of the Government of Chaco announced: We just need to have all the technological resources and necessary equipment for being ready to train all staff», these being the words of the Edwin Passmore, North American Chief Commander of the South, who had a meeting with Governor Jorge Capitanich a few weeks ago.(1)



Up to this point this is a «humanitarian» initiative shown as some help in case of catastrophes from a superpower to a south republic, which surprisingly has not been relevant to the Media (being the latter the first to speak out against the disastrous measures taken by the government, but clearly avoids investigating or reporting on USA measures in the region and/or Argentina).



The first approach to this issue of the foreign base was mentioned by Chaco (and Argentina as well, as this issue was agreed by the former minister and current senator Aníbal Fernández and the Chaco Governor in that moment). It was related to the reason «why we need of foreign special support to be prepared to face an eventual natural catastrophe «, when we know that the national state counts on the necessary means, personnel and bodies which have been duly trained to be up to the needs under catastrophic situations. But, even when we could be short of resources in that area, why not resorting to international organizations which are specialists (White Helmets, Pan-American Health Organization, Unicef or the Red Cross) and instead of them we are requiring the support of a military body from a foreign power through the Southern Command.



What is the Southern Command? It is a body which has for years taken the role of: the leader organization among the existing North American Agencies (State Department - CIA –DEA, etc.), in order to guarantee: «security, stability and prosperity in all America», and this role of the South Command lies within the rising power of the Defense Department along the North American foreign politics, as part of a comprehensive plan, being this separate from the other issues US is involved in and, even more importantly, independent of any possible «change» in US administration. Besides, we can mention that the XXI century is not and shall not be a peaceful period in time. The political dynamics which leads this century is more and more expressed in military terms.



Since USA started to lose its influence over Latin America, economically speaking: China, India and Russia and the EU have become important partners in the region, leaving aside US power along the XX century; and politically speaking: as Latin America, mainly South America, led integration processes which were consolidated with Mercosur, UNASUR, ALBA, CELAC, and which do not include USA. The role of USA presence in the area was done by the Southern Command which took the role of the representative of the empire in our territory, as once were the Proconsuls of the Roman Empire. Not to acknowledge this fact is a serious crime when we need to make strategic alliances, for the consequences they might bring us. One of the new strategies of the Southern Command to make less suspicious and better seen their presence in the region is their humanitarian role, which is neither harmless nor neutral. This means to appear with military bases, which should not be either military or bases, but Security and Cooperation Centers; being this the new ‘flexible’ concept of the Pentagon of the 'military bases' which are not clear enough as regards the civil activities, bringing this greater 'confusion' on the public opinion (2).



Within this context, it is not a coincidence that Chaco Governor, Jorge Capitanich has already started a crusade to settle here the «American Union», when in September 2010 he welcomed a group of North American delegates, who were invited by a local Foundation (as there´s always a foundation which is the «link» to have these meetings. In that event the governor called for a strategic Alliance between North and South America for the goodwill of the continent, which by being unified would be able to reposition itself as a world power, as Capitanich firmly stated: «I will defend this. Together we can be the greatest reservoir of mining, sweet water, food, energy, cultural resources, touristic spots, human resources talents and technology related to productive processes», these were the words of the governor who spoke as a president. He ended his speech by saying: «From South America we perceive with certain sadness that the United States does not consider us an ally» (3), he also stated that this crisis is an opportunity to strengthen our relations. «I go for a strategic Alliance and I am willing to fight for this idea», he added.



These declarations which are sustained by the base being set up in the Province, takes us to questioning, Are these policies agreeing with the idea of South American continental integration without US intervention, which most of the countries of the region and the national government backs up and defends? Clearly not. What would happen with the UNASUR and the CELAC if the idea of the American Liaison, claimed by Capitanich and the South American Defense Council, eventually succeeds? All we have done would be useless if we dare reject the state of dependency we have been leading with wrong national policies supported by this humanitarian power, which today comes to our rescue with the «non bases».Is this governor stoking once again the balkanization – division of the South American countries in the XXI century? It is clearly happening with the feelings of mistrust he might bring up. Which might be the true role of a humanitarian base in Chaco which is monitoring a region which seems to be unstable? All these within the context of the chief of the Southern Command, Douglas Fraser, who warned against about possible «geopolitical turbulence» in Bolivia; or with the annually submitted reports about the presence of international terrorists in the triple frontier (which have never been firmly proved); or its intervention with the argument of being of «help» to fight against drug dealing, these being the basis for President Evo Morales to agree that: the fight against drugs is the clear geopolitical tool for the USA to lead domain in our region (4). Even more this humanitarian base is located in an area which is rich in natural resources and might eventually controlled by western powers, mainly after the «water» became for the pentagon an strategic resource, together with petrol and gas, here and in the world, these are not neutral, but on the contrary, they are part of an initiative to set conflicts as the ones seen in South America when they promoted many contradictions among the different people; or by neutralizing processes which are contrary to their interests.



While our National Government promotes an international campaign to convince the world that the American partner, the UK has militarized the South Atlantic by having a news military base in Malvinas, the Chaco Governor, Jorge Capitanich, allows the legal admission of a military base in the continental territory, being him compared to the «Troyan horse» of the Southern Command in Argentina.



For all mentioned above, I dare say that the current situation in Chaco seems to be compared to sleeping with the enemy.



Notes:







1) Information published in the official website of the Government of Chaco

2) Spearhead of the United States South Command in the Argentinean Chaco - ARGENPRESS.info

3) Capitanich promotes a strategic Alliance with USA – Chacodiapordia.com

4) «Drugs, the geopolitical tool of the Empire» by Carlos Pereyra Mele











Strategic

Culture

Foundation



ONLINE JOURNAL 03.10.2010
23:25

Nil NIKANDROV

Strategic-Culture.org





Ecuador Coup Attempt Engineered by the CIA

Ecuador's police forces played the key role in the coup attempt which shattered the country on September 30. The passing of a law affecting the police officers' bonuses and job benefits became a pretext for the rebellion which erupted in the capital city of Quito and the Guayquil seaport town. Actually, the law was not supposed to entail pay reductions, but those who masterminded the coup managed to convince the police that it would and thus provoked the uprising.



The subsequent developments followed the traditional Latin American pattern: rebels created bases, set up roadblocks, and had all flights to and from Ecuador suspended. The country's air force counting scores of US-trained officers partially sided with the police, while pilots from Venezuela who served in Ecuador in the framework of the military cooperation program were isolated. President Rafael Correa barely escaped death when he approached the police barracks to explain the reforms personally: shooting was audible around, he was sprayed with tear gas, and, moreover, several combat grenades exploded nearby. The president and his bodyguards took refuge in a military hospital which was promptly besieged by the rebel police forces and armed civilians evidently furnished by the opposition. The siege continued for several hours until special forces arrived and escorted Correa to the presidential palace.



Over the past several years the police of Ecuador was courted by the US Embassy which no doubt had its own interests in mind. Money from funds run by the FBI, the CIA, the DEA, and other US agencies was routinely poured into bonuses for the police top brass and operatives, equipment for various police divisions, etc. The cooperation became so cordial that occasionally the US intelligence community used Ecuador's police and army intelligence service to keep under surveillance the country's politicians, journalists, and others regarded as potential opponents of the US. Ecuador's intelligence services rushed information to their US partners during the crisis that hit the country's relations with Columbia after the latter bombed FARC camps in the territory of the former, leaving their own government blind to details of the situation.



The January, 2007 advent of Correa's patriotic administration largely put an end to the abnormal arrangement as the Ecuadorian government started to regain control over the country's agencies. Among other things, Correa forbade them to maintain unofficial ties with the US Embassy or get on its payroll. The efforts predictably angered Washington which, in one instance, demonstratively demanded that the Ecuadorian drug enforcement agency return the computers formerly supplied to it by DEA. The relations between Ecuador and the US saw another chill when Correa closed the US airbase in Mante. In response, Washington slammed Quito over its friendship with Venezuela and Nicaragua, diapproval of Plan Colombia, and the implementation of an original model of socialism.



The success of the operation which led to the ouster of president Manuel Zelaya in Honduras inspired the US hawks to put similar schemes to works elsewhere in Latin America, Washington's eventual goal being to isolate Hugo Chavez and remove his allies from power across the region. The US Administration reckoned that Ecuador was the easiest target on its political hit list. Correa's reforms meet with staunch resistance mounted by the local oligarchy, pro-US elites, and the army officers corps zombied in the notorious School of the Americas to fight communism which under present-day conditions circulates as a bracket term for whatever political movements Washington frowns upon.



The subversive activity targeting president Correa is coordinated by Heather Hodges who was appointed as the US ambassador to Ecuador in August, 2008.She did a job in Guatemala during the reign of its bloody dictator Rios Montt and served as deputy director of the US State Department's Cuban division which is known to be tightly interwoven with the CIA. Mrs. Hodges also worked with USAID in several countries and served as the US ambassador to Moldova where her mission was to alienate the country's leadership from Russia and to organize a color revolution with the help of pro-western NGOs and the energetic youths from the US Peace Corps. At the moment her trainees are employed by the CIA stations in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador.



US Secretary of State H. Clinton visited Quito last June to assess the situation from within and to probe into the possibility of reorienting president Correa from Chavez to the US, but failed to exact any concessions from the Ecuadorian leader. As a result, Hodges was instructed to launch the operation aimed at weakening Correa's positions and – in the longer run – toppling him. USAID alone made a $40 mln financial infusion into the cause, former president Lucio being the key figure in the plot. Gutierrez's disastrous presidency ended with his escape from the country. Following an amnesty, he challenged Correa in the 2009 presidential race which he explainably lost.



According to the coup blueprint drafted by the CIA, Gutierrez was to announce the removal of “dictator” Correa and the transfer of authority to a provisional government in a televised address. The plan additionally included the disbandment of Ecuadorian parliament and the organization of snap elections. The conspirators, however, were dispersed by the defenders of the legitimate president and failed to clear Gutierrez's access to TV. Besides, the Indian organizations from the PACHAKUTIK group chose not to partake. The coup therefore collapsed.



Currently Ecuador is under emergency rule. Correa plans to purge the country's law enforcement agencies and to find out who – including the army officers – was involved. Charges are already being pressed against Gutierrez and his Sociedad Patriotica.



Causes of the unrest in Ecuador and the steps necessary to prevent the recurrence of coups in Latin America were analyzed during the UNASUR emergency meeting which convened in Buenos Aires on October 1. Attention should be paid to the fact that Washington chose not to condemn the perpetrators of the coup in Ecuador.











-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













21 - Breaking News and Commentary from Citizens For Legitimate Government

25 Apr 2012

http://www.legitgov.org

All links are here:

http://www.legitgov.org/#breaking_news

Pentagon establishes Defense Clandestine Service, new espionage unit 23 Apr 2012 The Pentagon is planning to ramp up its spying operations against high-priority targets such as Iran under an intelligence reorganization aimed at expanding the military's espionage efforts beyond war zones, a senior defense official said Monday. The newly created Defense Clandestine Service would work closely with the CIA in an effort to bolster espionage operations overseas at a time when the missions of the agency and the military increasingly converge. The official said the new service is expected to grow "from several hundred to several more hundred" operatives in the coming years.



Ex-spy: Destroying CIA tapes purged 'ugly visuals' 24 Apr 2012 The retired top CIA officer who ordered the destruction of videos showing waterboarding says in a new book that he was tired of waiting for Washington's bureaucracy to make a decision that protected American lives. [Sociopath] Jose Rodriguez, who oversaw the CIA's once-secret interrogation and detention program, also lashes out at President Barack Obama's administration for calling waterboarding torture and criticizing its use. "I cannot tell you how disgusted my former colleagues and I felt to hear ourselves labeled 'torturers' by the president of the United States," Rodriguez writes in his book, "Hard Measures."



Padilla takes torture case to US Supreme Court 24 April 2012 US citizen Jose Padilla, who was jailed for four years as an "enemy combatant" and claims to have been tortured, has asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his civil case against top US officials. His bid to sue former and present officials including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and former secretary Donald Rumsfeld was rejected by an appeals court in January, which said they enjoyed official immunity. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Padilla's mother Estela Lebron appealed the ruling. Padilla is in a maximum-security prison in Colorado after being convicted in 2007 of aiding a homegrown Al-Qaeda [al-CIAduh] cell.



2 Marines to Be Dismissed for Lying About Haditha Killings 20 Apr 2012 The Navy on Thursday initiated dismissal proceedings against two Marines from a squad that killed 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians in 2005, saying they lied to military investigators after the massacre. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus made the decision, and Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz and Sgt. Humberto Mendoza were notified of the move Thursday, said Lt. Cmdr. Tamara Lawrence, a Navy spokeswoman. The Marine Corps dropped criminal charges against both men in exchange for their testimony at the trial of former Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, the squad leader and lone Marine convicted in the Haditha killings.



WikiLeaks: Judge refuses to throw out charges against Bradley Manning 25 Apr 2012 A military judge refused on Wednesday to throw out the charges against Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of providing thousands of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks in the biggest leak of government secrets in the country's history. Colonel Denise Lind, the judge presiding over Pfc Manning's court-martial, denied the defense motion to dismiss all 22 charges during a pre-trial hearing. Pfc Manning is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy website run by Julian Assange.



Judge refuses to dismiss GI's WikiLeaks case 25 Apr 2012 A military judge refused on Wednesday to throw out the case against an Army private accused of providing reams of sensitive documents to Wikileaks in the biggest leak of government secrets in U.S. history. Army Col. Denise Lind denied the defense motion to dismiss all 22 charges during a pretrial hearing in the court-martial of Pfc. Bradley Manning. The hearing continued after the ruling and is scheduled to run through Thursday. The defense has filed several motions seeking dismissal of individual charges, including the most serious, aiding the enemy.



Bradley Manning lawyer says case 'mishandled' as hearings continue 24 Apr 2012 Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of leaking hundreds of thousands of secret state documents to WikiLeaks, will face his military detractors again on Tuesday at the start of up to three more days of procedural hearings ahead of a full court martial. Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, has filed several defence motions with the military court in Fort Meade, Maryland, that call for all 22 charges against his client to be dismissed on grounds that the prosecution has mishandled the case. The lawyer will argue that the proceedings have been beset by delays and by refusal to hand over key documents during the discovery process, which he will say is a violation of the military rule book for court martials.



Army major's despair at our 'pointless war': Senior officer's damning emails reveal plummeting morale at heart of Afghan campaign that has cost 409 British lives 21 Apr 2012 They are stark words that reveal the despair of our forces fighting in Afghanistan. Emails sent to a former military chaplain paint a damning picture of sinking morale among Servicemen who feel the human cost of the conflict can no longer be justified. Dr Peter Lee, a university lecturer who spent seven years as an RAF padre, has released the emails to highlight the extent of disillusionment within the ranks. The correspondence includes two emails sent by a major on the brink of a fresh deployment to the region. He likens the prospect to 'being put on for the last two minutes of a lost game' of rugby.



Heads up! Big false flag brewing for NATO summit: 500 troopers may help handle NATO protesters --NATO summit designated 'National Special Security Event' --National Guard schedules 'emergency response drill' outside Chicago during summit week 22 Apr 2012 As many as 500 troopers from the Illinois State Police will assist the Chicago Police Department in handling thousands of protesters expected to descend on Chicago during the May 20-21 NATO summit, City Hall sources said Friday. Earlier this week, the Illinois National Guard disclosed that as many as 600 of its troops would help move international delegations around the city during the summit. The National Guard also revealed that it has scheduled an emergency response drill outside the city during summit weekend so even more of its troops can be summoned to Chicago in the event of largescale trouble. [Bye-bye, Posse Comitatus!]



Five held in Luton 'terror cell' raids --Cops and MI5 swoop to thwart feared [fabricated] attacks 25 Apr 2012 Five suspected terror plotters were being quizzed last night — after police and MI5 swooped in the al-Qaeda [al-CIAduh] "hotbed" of LUTON. The men -- targets of an intelligence operation lasting eight months - were being grilled amid fears that terror attacks were planned. They were seized at separate addresses in the Bedfordshire town and whisked 30 miles to a top-security police station in London. Top brass ordered the raids over a plot that was feared to be increasingly taking shape. Their homes are understood to have been searched previously -- last September -- but no arrests were made at that time.



Did MI6 spy really die alone? DNA found on bag may place second person at scene 25 Apr 2012 Video footage of Gareth Williams's death scene was shown in a court yesterday, which included shots of a bag with the body of Gareth Williams still inside. Examination of the red North Face sports holdall also showed traces of the DNA of another person on the zip toggle and the padlock, the inquest into the computer specialist's death was told... A graphic impression showed the way 34-year-old Mr Williams was found inside the bag – in a foetal position lying on his back, naked, with his knees raised and arms folded across his chest. The key to the padlock was under his right buttock, making it "incredibly difficult" for him to have reached it in an attempt, somehow, to escape.



'I've had my phone tapped': Susan Sarandon claims 'government is watching her'... and reveals she was denied White House security clearance 23 Apr 2012 Actress and left-wing activist Susan Sarandon has claimed she was recently denied security clearance for a visit to the White House - and that the government has been tapping her phone. The Oscar winner, who has vehemently condemned the war in Iraq, made the claims on Sunday during a Q&A session at the Tribeca Film Festival - an 11-day event in New York's Lower Manhattan. One audience member asked whether Sarandon, who was answering questions alongside documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, believed she was under surveillance by the government. 'We know we're under surveillance,' Sarandon said: 'I've had my phone tapped.'



Fukushima air to stay radioactive in 2022 --Radiation forecasts were compiled to help municipalities draw up recovery and repopulation programs for the nuclear disaster. 23 Apr 2012 A decade from now, airborne radiation levels in some parts of Fukushima Prefecture are still expected to be dangerous at above 50 millisieverts a year, a government report says. The report, which contains projections through March 2032, was presented by trade minister Yukio Edano Sunday to leaders of Futaba, one of the towns that host the crippled Fukushima No. 1 power plant.



Japan fears nuclear plant sits atop active geological fault 25 Apr 2012 A nuclear plant in northwestern Japan may be sitting right on top of an active geological fault, the country's nuclear watchdog has said, raising the risk that the facility may never resume power generation for fear of an earthquake. The fault fracture zone under the No.1 and No.2 units of the 1,517-megawatt Tsuruga plant could be an active fault that could move jointly with a confirmed nearby active fault, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) found in a site survey on Tuesday, a spokesman for the plant's operator said.



Feds make first arrest in BP oil spill; ex-engineer accused of deleting hundreds of messages 24 Apr 2012 Federal prosecutors brought the first criminal charges Tuesday in the Gulf oil spill, accusing a former BP engineer of deleting more than 300 text messages that indicated the blown-out well was spewing far more crude than the company was telling the public at the time. Two years and four days after the drilling-rig explosion that set off the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, Kurt Mix, 50, of Katy, Texas, was arrested and charged with two counts of obstruction of justice for allegedly destroying evidence.



6.7 million bats already dead, White-nose Syndrome could lead to extinction of some species - scientists 10 Apr 2012 More than six million bats are dead, and millions more are expected to fall victim to a disease known as White-nose Syndrome, or WNS. First identified in the northeastern United States, WNS has wiped out an estimated 95% of Pennsylvania's bat population and is quickly spreading across the country. It was most recently discovered in Missouri, Delaware and Alabama. "This is like bringing small pox to the New World. It is surely an unprecedented wildlife disaster for North America," said Bucknell University professor Dr. DeeAnn Reeder.



Mega barf alert: New case of mad cow disease in California 25 Apr 2012 The first new case of mad cow disease in the US since 2006 has been discovered in a dairy cow in California, but health authorities said the animal never posed a threat to the nation's food supply. The infected cow, the fourth ever discovered in the US, was found as part of an Agriculture Department surveillance program that tests about 40,000 cows a year for the fatal brain disease. Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is fatal to cows and can cause a fatal human brain disease in people who eat tainted beef.



20 arrested protesting Wells Fargo meeting in SF 24 Apr 2012 Hundreds of protestors tried to shut down a Wells Fargo's shareholders meeting in San Francisco's Financial District Tuesday. Even though they weren't successful, parts of California and Sacramento Streets were closed to traffic throughout the day. A coalition of union workers and Occupy organizers led the march up California to the Merchant Bank building. Their stated goal was to disrupt the Wells Fargo shareholders meeting. "Let us in! Let us in! Let us in," they chanted.



Hundreds march in Phoenix against Arizona immigration law --'SB 1070 Targets Brown People' 25 Apr 2012 A few hundred protesters, some toting placards reading "no to racial profiling," marched through downtown Phoenix on Wednesday to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to block Arizona's two-year-old crackdown on illegal immigrants. Protesters, some chanting "no justice, no peace, no racist police," set off on a three-mile route passing by city hall, a hardline local sheriff's office and the headquarters of the federal immigration police in the city.



U.S. high court appears to back Arizona on immigration 25 Apr 2012 Conservative justices who hold a majority on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to endorse Arizona's immigration crackdown on Wednesday, rejecting the Obama administration stance that the federal government has sole power over those who illegally enter the United States. During 80 minutes of oral arguments, the justices suggested by their questions and comments that states have significant latitude to adopt laws that discourage illegal immigrants from moving to and staying in the country. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who often casts the deciding vote, referred to the "social and economic disruption" that states endure as a result of a flood of illegal immigrants and suggested that states such as Arizona have authority to act.



2 House Democrats Defeated After Opposing Health Law 26 Apr 2012 The defeat of two conservative House Democrats by more liberal opponents in Tuesday's Pennsylvania primary illustrates the strong hold the new health care law still has over committed Democratic voters and foreshadows an even more polarized Congress next year in the aftermath of the latest round of redistricting. Representatives Jason Altmire and Tim Holden both lost in primaries to opponents who joined together with activist groups to pummel the veteran lawmakers over the opposition to the new health care law and climate change legislation - positions they had used to their advantage in the past to show their independence from President Obama and the Democratic Party.



Gingrich to suspend presidential bid Tuesday 25 Apr 2012 Newt Gingrich began taking steps Wednesday to shut down his debt-laden presidential bid, setting the stage to endorse one-time rival Mitt Romney next week and rally the GOP behind its apparent nominee. Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond said the former House speaker spoke with Romney on Wednesday and had started planning an event where he would throw his support behind the likely nominee. Gingrich had pinned his hopes on a strong showing in Delaware that did not materialize after the polls closed Tuesday night. On Wednesday morning, he acknowledged to North Carolina voters that his White House dreams were effectively over.



Karl Rove Buys 5 More States for Mitt Romney --After 5 More Contests, Romney Solidifies Lead 25 Apr 2012 Mitt Romney effectively assumed the helm of the Republican Party on Tuesday after five primary victories across the Northeast solidified his stature as the presidential nominee-in-waiting who is trying to unite conservatives and persuade independent voters that President Obama does not deserve a second term. As Mr. Romney received a significant boost in delegates from New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Delaware, lurching closer to the total needed to formally secure the nomination, he marked the milestone by outlining themes of the fall campaign in a visit to this battleground state.



George Zimmerman released from jail on $150K bond 23 Apr 2012 George Zimmerman was released around midnight Sunday from a Florida county jail on $150,000 bail as he awaits his second-degree murder trial for fatally shooting Trayvon Martin. The neighborhood watch volunteer [alleged killer] was wearing a brown jacket and blue jeans and carrying a paper bag. He walked out following another man and didn't look over at photographers gathered outside.



CLG needs your support.

http://www.legitgov.org/donate.html

Or, please mail a check or money order to CLG:

Citizens for Legitimate Government (CLG)

P.O. Box 1142

Bristol, CT 06011-1142

Contributions to CLG are not tax deductible.



Feel free -- and CLG encourages you -- to forward this newsletter to your lists and friends!

Those who wish to be added to the list can go here: http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg and add your name. Those who wish to unsubscribe can go here:http://lists.people-link.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legitgov. Please mark clg_news@legitgov.org as 'not spam' and do not delete from a spam or 'junk' folder, as such actions trigger false spam complaints against the CLG. If you have any inquiries/issues with your subscription, please write: signup at legitgov dot org.



CLG Editor-in-Chief: Lori Price. CLG Chair: Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D. Copyright © 2012, Citizens for Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













22 - Rothschilds Planned to Make Britain Communist

April 25, 2012



(left, Anthony Blunt 1907-1983, Queen's cousin and curator of her art until he was outed as a Soviet spy in 1979. The traitors were Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt.)



Victor Rothschild, the mystery fifth man, recruited and placed

four influential spies to help him subvert the UK. They were known as the "Cambridge Five."





Former intelligence asset T. Stokes says modern Britain reflects the Rothschilds' plan for Communist tyranny.











by T. Stokes

(henrymakow.com)



The role the Cambridge traitors like Anthony Blunt played played in bringing Britain into W W II on Communism's side will be revealed in a new book which cannot yet be identified.



The new book should reveal how and why Communist recruitment teams were allowed to flourish in the British Universities. This is related to generous bequests from Victor Rothschild.



(Victor Rothschild 1910-1990, in a Masonic pose)



The Cambridge Apostles were working for the time when Britain was ruled by the Communist system, maybe under another name but still communist and they were promised positions of great power.



Britain was to undergo many of the hardships of the Russian people, such as unemployment, starvation, loss of national rights and stature; the elimination of Christianity and the extinction of the Royal family as in France and Russia, and the installation of multiculturalism and loss of national identity.



Stalin played this constantly inside the Soviet Bloc pitting one race against another, and according to the book "The Great Terror" murdering as many as 63 million of his captive people, or useless eaters he called them.

(See Oleg Bzorski document "Stalin's Long March to Britain ".)



The English race was to be phased out similar to Germany; no Anglo Saxons would exist in 80 years. Prison camps for dissidents would dot the British countryside.



All the Cambridge traitors felt that Britain was failing fast and this was their only hope.



Anthony Blunt believed what Rothschild told him, that the wealth and artworks of the royal family would be confiscated and Buckingham palace would become a museum for the people.



He would build a huge art museum in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv called the Sir Anthony Blunt Institute. There would be marble floors and a special Poussin section where Blunt could give talks on his favorite French painters.



Rothschild told him that he was working to build financial power blocks.



Britain would go into the EU, gradually the number of world power blocks would be reduced and left with a one-world-currency one world army and one world government controlled by the Zionists based in Jerusalem.



The Cambridge traitors were untouchable. They did not realize that Russia was the Trojan horse which the Rothschilds had been running since 1917. Their largely completed goal: to take over the world.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















23 - Christians of the Holy Land



Despite claims by Israeli government officials, Christian Palestinians regularly face discrimination











A 2008 survey says 0.8 per cent of Christian Palestinians cited 'fleeing religious extremism' as a reason for emigration [EPA]

A recent report by CBS show 60 Minutes on "Christians of the Holy Land" has received a lot of attention, not least for the embarrassing contribution by Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Oren.



It is interesting that Israel (and its advocates) have been so concerned about the impact of a short segment regarding the challenges faced by Christian Palestinians under Israeli military occupation. In fact, Ambassador Oren himself only recently tried to exploit Christians for propaganda purposes - only to find that they objected to hiscynicism.



The Israeli government has long tried to suggest that the emigration of Christian Palestinians is the result of a "jihad" being waged by "terrorists" or "fundamentalists". There are obvious advantages to this strategy, particularly its dependence on pre-existing prejudices and stereotypes in the West. But it also seeks to neutralise a potentially damaging threat: that people around the world will see Christian Palestinians leaving their historic homeland due to Israeli colonisation and occupation.



In 1948, Christian Palestinians were not spared the devastation of the Nakba, when Israel destroyed hundreds of villages, and expelled up to 90 per cent of the Palestinians who would have been inside the new state. The hundreds of thousands prevented from returning home included35 per cent of all Christians in pre-1948 Mandate Palestine. Haifa's Christian population, for example, was reduced by 85 per cent. Some Christian Palestinians became citizens, but their land remains confiscated.





Inside Story Americas -

US churches consider divesting from Israel

Since 1967, Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza have been subject to Israel's military occupation, and on both sides of the Green Line, Christian Palestinians face the same conditions of systematic racial discrimination as Muslims - on the basis that they're not Jews.



Israeli colonisation has fragmented and splintered the traditional Christian heartland of Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Jerusalem - home to around 80 per cent of the Occupied Territories' Christians - through land confiscation, illegal settlements, the Separation Wall, and the regime of travel "permits".



The isolation of Bethlehem has hit Palestinian Christians particularly hard, where unemployment and poverty levels remain high. The illegal Separation Wall takes in approximately 10 per cent of the Bethlehem region, or governorate, including some of the most fertile land. Overall, through a combination of Israeli policies (including 19 illegal Jewish settlements), the UN estimates that only 13 per cent of the Bethlehem region is available for Palestinian use.



Economics and occupation



Unsurprisingly, these are conditions that make young people despair about the future. In fact, a number of studies show clearly the reasons why Christian Palestinians emigrate. It's not what Michael Oren or Christians United For Israel would have you believe.



As far back as 1993, 88 per cent of Christian Palestinians surveyed about emigration specified the economic situation. In a 2006 survey, 78 per cent of Christian respondents to a Bethlehem-based poll said "Israeli aggression and occupation are the main cause of emigration", while only 3.1 per cent exclusively blamed the "rise of Islamic movements" (12.1 per cent said it was a combination of the two). More than half of those Christians surveyed had at least one relative whose land had been confiscated by Israel.



Another, more wide-ranging survey in 2006 found that roughly 7 out of 10 Christians cited either political conditions or employment as the reason for emigration. Only 8 per cent cited religious fanaticism. When asked to name the challenges confronting Christians in the Holy Land, just under half of respondents chose job opportunities and housing (11 per cent chose religious fanaticism).



Finally, in a 2008 survey on reasons for emigration, 1 in 3 cited "lack of freedom and security", 1 in 4 said "deterioration of economy" - and only 0.8 per cent chose "fleeing religious extremism".



That economics and occupation are at the heart of Christian emigration trends is no surprise. As the World Bankregularly points out, Israeli restrictions on the free movement of people and goods (for Palestinians) is a key reason for economic weakness in the Occupied Territories.



This is what pro-Israel advocacy groups try to hide, preferring decontextualised, cherry-picked anecdotes or wild, unsubstantiated claims. But the consistent message of these surveys is the same as that expressed by the recent EU Heads of Mission Report on East Jerusalem:



"Church leaders cite as reasons for increased emigration: GoI [Government of Israel] imposed family-reunification restrictions, the limited ability of Christian communities in the Jerusalem area to expand due to confiscation of church properties and building restrictions, taxation problems and difficulties in obtaining residency permits for Christian clergy."





Israel's unwanted citizens

This is not to deny the existence of sectarian tensions in Palestinian society, and the tiny size of the Palestinian minority only heightens the sense of vulnerability. Muslim-Christian relations, and particularly the sense of concern felt by some Christians, have been shaped by a variety of factors, many of which originate in the facts of Israeli colonisation.



So for example, when looking at the demographics of a small city like Bethlehem, change over the decades has been caused by the influx of refugees, as well as rural-urban migration (both mainly Muslim). Israeli policies are the root cause - whether through direct expulsions of Palestinians, or through land confiscations and other policies which have made village life so difficult.



A scarcity of land and resources coupled with the legal anarchy that comes from having no real government, means that in the Occupied Territories, weaker groups are vulnerable to exploitation by corrupt individuals. In addition, a recent lamentable development has been the increased strength of socio-political groups that promote an exclusionary and fanatical form of "Islam".



Naturally then, Christian Palestinians see their main problem as coming from ongoing colonialism and occupation, while also acknowledging the threat posed by a minority of religious extremists. Apparently, however, this position is a bit too complex for Israel advocates to grasp.



There is a key distinction between individual bigotry and the kind of coordinated, systematic racial discrimination - or apartheid - as practised by the Israeli state for decades, which affects Muslim and Christian Palestinians alike.



When Israel's Housing Minister calls it "a national duty to prevent the spread" of Palestinian citizens in the Galilee - he is not distinguishing between Christian and Muslim. Nor was Ehud Olmert, former-PM then mayor of Jerusalem, when he said it is "a matter of concern when the non-Jewish population rises a lot faster than the Jewish population".



What Human Rights Watch has described as Israel's "two-tier system" where Palestinians face "systematic discrimination merely because of their race, ethnicity and national origin" affects everyone, Christian and Muslim. Sadly, no wonder some choose to leave



Many, however, have chosen to stay, and they, like so many other civil society groups, are calling on people around the world - including churches - to stand up and be counted: to use time-honoured strategies of boycott and divestment to ensure that Palestine/Israel is a place where your rights - and even your ability to be there at all - are not determined by religion and ethnicity.



Ben White is a freelance writer, specialising in Palestine and Israel.



Ben White

Freelance journalist Ben White is author of Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner's Guide.



Follow him on Twitter @benabyad























-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



















24 - THE JEWISH SIEGE OF EUROPE





THE JEWISH SIEGE OF EUROPE is now in full battle maneuvers, engagement and encirclement.



Under the umbrella of the European Jewish Union, (the uniting structure for all Jewish organizations throughout Europe), a brand new No-Goys-Allowed organization wasinaugurated on February 17, 2012, the “first ever” European Jewish Parliament.



Although the European Jewish Parliament is an obvious racist organization, the EU Parliament, which claims to represent ALL minorities, opened its doors to these Christ-Hating Jews by allowing them to hold their “inaugural” ceremony in its own headquarters in Brussels.



Hailed as a “great day” for Europe, 120 members of the European Jewish Parliament toasted their election with declarations of it marking an “historic event” in which “one assembly standing for one cause” further “empowers” European Jewry.



And that Jewish “empowerment” wasted no time in making demands upon the cowering Gentile European majority, (once known as Christendom before Jewry’s onslaught), insistingon the termination of Lady Catherine Ashton as the EU’s foreign minister.



AN ALL-OUT JEWISH blood-lust campaign against Baroness Ashton is now armed to the teeth in which the Jewish Parliament is demanding that she either “repent” or “resign.”View Jew Demand Here.



The Jewish hysteria centers around Ashton’s comments on April 13 regarding the killing of four Jews at the Ozar Hatorah school in Toulouse France last month.



Condemning Lady Ashton for drawing a “despicable” moral equivalent between the Toulouse killings and the Israeli assaults on Gaza, the European Jewish Parliament wants nothing less than Ashton’s blood.



Evidently, Jewry pays no gratitude to those who host their Jewish balls and ceremonies, namely, Brussels, which gave the Jews full use of its parliamentary headquarters on February 17, 2012.



Only two months later, the Jews repaid Brussels by demanding it throw its highly esteemed foreign minister into the rubbish heap and flush her down the toilet.



SUCH is the manner of the Jew: vicious castigation, arrogance, ingratitude, and overweening hubris.



WHEN JEWRY WAS FORBIDDEN



CHRISTIAN BYZANTIUM extended from the Balkans to Western Europe during the 4th through 15th Centuries AD.



Thus, the Byzantine Empire, (not taught, of course, in Jew-run Public Schools and Colleges), was known to its inhabitants as “Rhomania” because Constantine the Great, Byzantium’s first Emperor from 306 to 337 AD, established the empire’s center in Constantinople as the “New Rome.”



In addition to being a Christian civilization in which the Church worked in “symphony” with the State, (as today in Putin’s Russia), Byzantium had one further characteristic, namely, its claim to be the direct continuation of the Roman Empire, a claim maintained until its fall in 1453 at the hands of Muslim invaders.



One essential feature of the Byzantine Empire was its policy toward the Jews. This policy was codified by Emperor Justinian in the 6th Century AD, popularly known as, “The Code of Justinian.”









JUSTINIAN’S CODE FORBADE Jews from holding civil office and teaching positions. Even part of the Orthodox Church’s “canon law” prohibited its members from seeking out “remedies” from Jewish physicians.



Compiling various laws regarding the Jews that were established before him into a legal codification, Justinian forbade Jews:



+ To engage in proselytism; + To marry Orthodox Christian women; + To possess Orthodox Christian servants; + To hold office or honors in the Roman state; + To build new synagogues;+ To read the Old Testament in Hebrew but rather in Greek which did not cut out the prophecies that pointed to Jesus Christ; + To use Judaic interpretations of the Old Testament; + To bear witness in court against an Orthodox Christian; + To hold teaching positions in Roman schools or as private tutors.



The culmination of Justinian’s “Codex” was the denial of Roman citizenship to the Jews and relegating them to the rank of second class citizens.



In spite of Jewry calling Justinian an “anti-Semite,” the Orthodox Church not only honorshim as a great Emperor but also as a great saint. View Entire Prohibitions Here, Here, Here& Here.



THE SOLUTION TO THE JEWISH PROBLEM is for Europe to return to its Christian roots—the historical Church—in which the “evangelical” error that posits the Jew as “chosen” and having some “special” role to play has no place.



Neo-paganism and idyllic myths that salivate over Indo-European “gods” promoted by White-Identity Websites will only provide the Jew with yet another stepping stone to greater hegemony over the political affairs of European society.



Wagner (a profound master) and his operas indeedare milestones in the evolution of classical music.



But to elevate Wagner’s Nordic Wodens and Fricas to realms of some new European “reformation” is not only laughable but historically shallow.



“Europe Is The Church and The Church Is Europe!” said the great 20th Century historian, Hilaire Belloc.



It is via the historical Church, and ONLY the historical Church, that the Jewish siege of Europe can be opposed, dismantled and ultimately destroyed.









Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation ! Send Your Contribution To:

The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443

E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@yahoo.com

___________________





For More See: Christian Roots Of White Nations Click Here



And: The Struggle To Save Inner Europe Click Here



And: The End Of The Jewish Age Click Here



And: A Look At Europe’s New Right Click Here







GEORGE ORWELL’S ZIONIST NIGHTMARE

By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008-2011



Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner

& Link To Real Jew News (SM)



Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Send Your Contribution To:

Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443

E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com



Sources: Police State Planning Here; Big Brother in the New Millennium, Llyod Klein



.

GEORGE ORWELL’S 1984 foresaw a society in which citizens would have little recourse against government power.



In Orwell’s vision domestic surveillance would be the norm and civil liberties would be nonexistent.



It is now obvious that Zionists will be our “Big Brothers” who will be “Watching Us.” Already set in place is the all pervasive US Department of Homeland Security which is run by Zionist Jews Michael Chertoff & Senator Joseph Lieberman. Also set in place is the training of Police Departments throughout the US by the insidious Zionist Anti Defamation League(ADL) Here & Here.



The Zionist engineered War on Terror is the chosen pretext for the erecting of a high tech surveillance society relentlessly pursued by US Homeland Security. In other words: “Big Brother Jew Will Be Watching You.”









THE APPARATUS OF JEWISH TOTALITARIANISM



Once the technological apparatus of totalitarianism is fully established the prospect of a planetary dictatorship will be in place. Human existence will then be micro-managed by a tiny Zionist ruling elite setting the stage for the Anti Christ who will be a Jew.





Here’s What The Zionist Elite Will Use To Watch Us:



1) Implantable Microchips: In 2002 Applied Digital Solutions worked to get its “VeriChip”- a biochip the size of a grain of rice containing personal data - classified as a non-regulated device. The company’s wish was granted by the FDA.



Paroled prisoners, Alzheimer’s sufferers, and convicted shoplifters have all demo-ed the “VeriChip” so that authorities could keep tabs on their whereabouts.



2) Global Positioning Satellite Systems: Under current proposals US Homeland Securitywill be able to track cars by satellite & disable them by remote control.



3) PC Police: A computer device designed to spy on citizens using personal computers.Digital Future Co advertises its PC Police device as a “stealth monitoring application” that will record all keystrokes on a computer. US Homeland Security & the ADL have already targeted the Internet as a “terrorist” center Here & Here.





Wake Up America!

The Zionist Big Brothers Are At The Door…

___________________________________



For More See: “A Jewish Police State Is Coming” Click Here



And: “Big Brother Jew Is Watching You At Homeland Security” Click Here



And: “Reclaiming America’s National Identity From The Jews” Click Here











-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













25 - Orthodox Abuse Suspects Get Exemption

Agudath Israel Opposes Brooklyn Prosecutors' Refusal to Identify

By Paul Berger

Published April 24, 2012, issue of May 04, 2012.





This is an updated version of a story that first appeared on forward.com earlier this week.



Orthodox Jews convicted of or charged with child sex abuse in Brooklyn should have their identities protected because of the community’s “tight-knit and insular” nature, prosecutors claim in a response to The Forward’s request for information about the cases.



KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICENo Names of Orthodox: Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes says the ‘tight-knit’ nature of the Orthodox community makes it impossible to disclose the identities of abuse suspects without also identifying their victims.Rejecting the request under the state’s Freedom of Information Law, the Brooklyn district attorney’s office stated that Orthodox Jews deserve a blanket exemption from the usual public disclosure rules.



Brooklyn prosecutors, working in the office of District Attorney Charles Hynes, claimed that Orthodox Jews are “unique” in that releasing the names of suspects would allow others in the community to identify their victims.



“The circumstances here are unique,” Assistant District Attorney Morgan Dennehy wrote in an April 16 letter to the Forward. “Because all of the requested defendant names relate to Hasidic men who are alleged to have committed sex crimes against Hasidic victims within a very tight-knit and insular Brooklyn community, there is a significant danger that the disclosure of the defendants’ names would lead members of that community to discern the identities of the victims.”



Related

Brooklyn D.A. Refuses To Name Child Sex Abusers

Child Sex Arrests Spike. Or Do They?

Crackdown on Child Sex Abuse Unravels

The policy quickly came under fire from community groups, children’s advocates and legal experts.



Agudath Israel of America, an Orthodox umbrella group that usually supports Hynes’s approach to combating abuse in the community, came out against the decision to claim a blanket exemption.



Rabbi David Zwiebel, who is Agudath’s executive vice president and a legal expert, said that a policy of withholding names of perpetrators should not be “across the board” in any community, according to Agudath spokesman Rabbi Avi Shafran.



Instead, Zwiebel believes that the release of defendants’ names should be evaluated on “a case-by-case basis,” Shafran said.



Although Brooklyn District Attorney Hynes has long resisted requests to identify Orthodox sex suspects, the letter is believed to represent the first time his office spelled out why it specifically singled them out for preferential treatment.



Dennehy cited the state’s civil rights laws in denying the Forward’s request for the names of 85 Orthodox Jews arrested on sex charges during the past three years. The Forward made its request in December 2011 after prosecutors announced that scores of Orthodox Jews had been charged under a special program designed to encourage the community to come forward with information.



He did not explain whether prosecutors had concluded that there was anything specific about each of the 85 suspects that might make it possible for others to determine the identity of the victim from the identity of the suspect.



He also did not explain whether such a blanket exemption might be granted to other similarly “tight-knit” communities in the borough. And there were no details about what criteria prosecutors would use to determine whether a particular group should be granted such preferential status.’











Dennehy also claimed that revealing the names of abuse suspects could harm the operation of the D.A.’s special hotline, Kol Tzedek, or the Voice of Justice, which was set up three years ago to encourage Orthodox abuse victims to come forward. Disclosing suspects’ names could cause victims to lose faith in the hotline, which, in turn, would “interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,” he claimed.



Marci Hamilton, a law professor at Yeshiva University, said that prosecutors’ refusal to release the suspects’ names or other information about their alleged crimes amounts to “enabling” abusers.



“I think they are complicit in what enables these kinds of perpetrators in these kinds of communities if they are going… to refuse to publish names of any child sex predators,” Hamilton said. “When names of perpetrators are made public, their other victims are empowered to come forward and the whole community is given the power to identify and stop them and other predators.”



Hamilton added, “What the D.A.’s office is doing, unfortunately, is playing right into the hands of the abusers.”



Laura Ahearn, executive director of the advocacy group Parents for Megan’s Law, said disclosure laws must be applied equally to everyone.



Her group advocates for enforcement of the rules mandating identification of sex offenders. The issue came to national prominence after the 1994 rape and murder of Megan Kanka in suburban New Jersey by a convicted sex offender living on the family’s block.



“[Hynes’s] decision to withhold names is likely leaving the public vulnerable,” Ahearn said.



Daniel Mullkoff, a legal fellow with the New York Civil Liberties Union, said there was no good reason to withhold the names of abuse suspects from the public.



“In this case, the public has raised concerns about what the district attorney is doing,” he said. “Withholding of this information is without a legal basis and denies access to just the type of information that the public records law seeks to make public.”



In October 2009, Hynes’s office redacted the names of 26 Orthodox Jews on a list of those charged with sex crimes. A Freedom of Information Law request submitted by the Forward to see those names was refused.



When Hynes last year trumpeted the arrests of 85 Orthodox Jews on sex crimes charges since 2008, he again refused to release the suspects’ names.



He cited the need to protect the identity of victims. Yet that same week, Hynes issued a press release publicizing the name of a non-Jewish man convicted of raping his girlfriend’s daughter. Hynes released the man’s name, the neighborhood where he lived and the victim’s age, enough information for any neighbor to identify the girl.



Hynes even refused to name 14 Orthodox defendants who were convicted of sex crimes, 10 of whom pleaded guilty. They were sentenced to between one month and 20 years in jail. Although some of those cases were covered in the media, several were adjudicated without public scrutiny.



An additional 24 people were released on probation after pleading to reduced charges, or after their cases were dismissed. Again, it is likely these cases were not reported in the media.



Marc Klaas, whose 12-year-old daughter, Polly, was abducted from the family’s Petaluma, Calif., home in 1993 and murdered, said he was very concerned about Hynes’s policy of withholding suspected sex offenders’ names.



Klaas said it was particularly wrongheaded to withhold the names of people who have pleaded guilty to lesser crimes, which would allow them to avoid having to register as sex offenders.



“The public has the right to know who these individuals are, so they can use that information to protect themselves against those individuals,” Klaas said.



Contact Paul Berger at berger@forward.com or on Twitter @pdberger







Read more: http://www.forward.com/articles/155197/orthodox-abuse-suspects-get-exemption/?p=all#ixzz1tKD4bUmg





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------















26 - TEXE MARRS : Why the Jewish Rabbis Love the Mormon Church













“And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.”

—

Revelation 13:11







“In 2009, five rabbis toured the Draper, Utah LDS (Mormon) Temple. One of the rabbis, a 75-year old who has been doing interfaith work for 50 years, removed his yarmulke (skull cap) while in the celestial room and said, it was the holiest place he had ever been in. Things like that are happening all over the world... There is a genuine Mormon-Jewish connection... Mormons who deal with Jews really have a profound appreciation for their own doctrines, temples, etc.”

—

Mark Paredes National Outreach Director, Zionist Organization of America (A Jew and a Mormon) Deseret News (Jan. 7, 2011)











America and the nations of this planet are now witnessing the most remarkable politico-religious dramas in the history of the world. Few people, however, possess the wisdom of discernment given only by God, and so the vast majority miss it entirely. They are the deaf and the dumb who can neither see nor understand, and so they are doomed to become victims of an approaching tsunami of horror.



I can see and hear the thundering roar of the tsunami wave as it approaches. I’ll do my best to describe what is now transpiring. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.



The Rise of the Beast Kingdom

For over 150 years Satan has carefully built up his earthly beast kingdom. Its centerpiece is Zionism, and the physical Judaic nation-state is the very eye of the beast, spiritually located in its forehead, which the Hindus call the “ajna.” This Judaic nation-state has its political and economic apparatus in Tel Aviv, London, Washington, D.C., and New York. Its spiritual capital is, however, earthly Jerusalem, with religious offshoots in Rome (the Vatican), New York (Judaism), Nashville (evangelical Zionists), San Francisco (Wicca and New Age), and Salt Lake City (Mormons).



Bible prophecy speaks, then, of Mystery, Babylon the Great encompassing the whole globe. This is World Jewry, the whore of Babylon, and yet the whore has many daughters. These many daughters fornicate with the beast (the Jewish serpent) and give the beast power and strength.



Mormon Church a Whorish Daughter



Mormonism is a Trojan Horse of global Zionism, and Mitt Romney is the perfect tool of Zionist interests.



One of these notorious and whorish daughters of the beast is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS), also called the Mormons.



Now the genius of the Mormons is that while this church is thoroughly Zionist and Judaic, it has all the artificial trappings of a false Christianity. The Mormon Church, some fifteen million strong, comes complete with a counterfeit New Testament (The Book of Mormon), a counterfeit “Jesus,” and it even teaches of a coming, earth-based “New Jerusalem.”



In reality, the Mormon Church, currently headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is nothing less than an anti-Christian, blasphemous arm of World Jewry. It is a Judaic cult. As such, the Jewish rabbis cooperate fully with the Salt Lake City religious elite in helping the Mormons achieve their earthly goals. Indeed, the real goal of the Mormon church is to exalt physical Israel as God’s Chosen People and to establish a Hebrew-led global empire. At the helm of that empire, the Mormons believe, will be a Hebrew King.



In sum, Mormonism is Judaism, and Judaism is Mormonism. But there is more. The Mormon Church is a Masonic creation. Its founder, Joseph Smith, was a Freemason, and its rituals and doctrines are essentially Masonic. Likewise, Freemasonry is itself a Judaic cult which honors the Jewish Kabbala as its doctrinal and ritualistic source.



And thus we arrive at another conclusion. Mormonism, Masonry, and Judaism are three integrated components, interlinked and inseparable. All three are antichrist in nature, and serpent-led in spiritual sustenance. They are Satan’s Zionist Army.







Mormon (LDS) woman gives a sign in a LDS Church ritual ceremony. It is exactly the same as that of Freemasonry, as proven by this excerpt from page 17 of Duncan’s Masonic Ritual and Monitor, illustrating the sign of an Entered Apprentice. Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon Church, borrowed many of his church’s signs, grips, symbols, and rituals from the Masonic Lodge. In fact, Smith was excommunicated by the Masons for having done so. (Photo of Mormon woman is from Mormonism, Masonry and Godhood, by Dr. Cathy Burns, Sharing Publishing, Mt. Carmel, Pennsylvania)





The Real Jesus Has No Place in These Three Groups

In Judaism, the name of Jesus is blasphemed and spat upon. In Freemasonry, the name of Jesus is never honored, and it is made clear to Masons that Jesus is not God. In contrast, in the Mormon cult, “Jesus” is honored but—hold on!—the Mormon “Jesus” is not the Jesus of the New Testament. In order to seduce and deceive, the Mormons introduce to the masses “another Jesus” and “another gospel” (II Corinthians 11:4); in other words, a counterfeit.



This counterfeit Jesus, say the founders of Mormonism and also today’s hierarchy in Salt Lake City, is only one of many millions of gods. The Mormon Jesus is said to be the “spiritual brother of Lucifer.” Indeed, someday, the Mormons teach, Lucifer will be redeemed and he, too, shall become a god.



Jesus, the Mormons claim, was a mere man who “earned” his godhood, and so did the Father God worshipped by the Mormons. He, too, was once a man, and this Father—who resides on a star called “Kolob”—has many, many wives whom he sexually copulates with and produces countless more spiritual children, male and female. Each of these countless, male spiritual children will someday become a “god” over his very own star-planet.



Jesus a Polygamist With Many Wives

Thus, “Jesus,” whom the Mormons say is also a polygamist, is “god” only of planet earth, not of the whole universe. And the good news for Mormon males is that they, too, if faithful to the church founded by Mason, Joseph Smith, will earn for themselves their own star-planet, where they will reign as monarch, copulating happily with their harem of wives and producing even more little deities.



This curious doctrine, incidentally, is central to the Mormon faith and has led one ex-Mormon to author a revealing, tell-all book entitled, The Godmakers.



Jewish Rabbis Love the Mormon “Jesus”

Can you imagine how pleased and ecstatic the fiendish Jewish rabbis are over the success of Mormonism? They are seeing a Judeo-Masonic cult steeped in kabbalistic doctrine and practices growing in numbers like frogs after a summer storm.



The rabbis must stand in awe to see this Judeo-Masonic cult present the most outlandish and preposterous of counterfeit Jesuses, a “Jesus” stripped of His universal Deity and made out to be a sex-crazed pasha of his own female harem.



The rabbis know that in their Talmud, the most holy book of Judaism, Jesus is labeled a blasphemer and a sexual magician and pervert. Oh the joy they must experience to discover that in the Mormon cult, Jesus is described as a minor god of one teensy planet out of trillions in the galaxy and that this minor deity, Jesus, is said to have been produced by the sex act between Mary and the Father God in Kolob.



This is a cosmic joke that the rabbis must gleefully relish. It’s enough to cause the Hasidic Jews in black garb and cobra curls dangling from under their weird black hats to hold hands and dance like whirling dervishes.



“Oy vey, I love that Mormon Jesus,” the rabbis scream out in ecstasy. “He’s almost as depraved as the Talmudic Jesus we Jews love to hate,” they cry out, doubling over with laughter.





In Deseret News Jan. 7, 2011), an official publication of the LDS General Conference, Mark Paredes, a high-ranking official of both the Zionist Organization of America and the American Jewish Congress, spoke of the theological connections of Mormons and Jews. Paredes was baptized a member of the LDS (Mormon) Church at age 11 and served as a Mormon Missionary to Italy.





An Anti-Jesus

So what we have here in Mormonism is a form of anti-Jesus. And now, a man firmly believing in this Judaic-approved anti-Jesus is very close to becoming President of the United States of America, the world’s premier superpower.



Sadly, we are faced with a Hobson’s Choice in voting for President of the United States. We know that a Barack Obama elected for a second term will result in a Communist takeover of America. On the other hand, a Romney presidency would be equally disastrous. Whether we end up with Obama or Romney, the Illuminist goals I warn of in my new DVD, Die America Die! will be fully implemented.



Republicans are being led to believe that a Mitt Romney as President will rescue us from evil. But if and when Mitt Romney assumes the mantle of President, the U.S.A. will be crowning with glory the Zionist Despot whom the Protocols of Zion heralded would bring all the nations together in a New World Order. On January 20, 2013, a lovely First Lady at his side, a Mormon pseudo-Jew, honored by millions as the King of the New Jerusalem, could be sworn into office.



The Trojan Horse is Rolled Into Place

And then, the great Trojan Horse of Zionism will be rolled into position. From its bowels will come the black plague of Satanic Judaism: Mormons, Jews, and Masons, hand-in-hand, ready to fulfill their Master’s desires.



The Oroboros serpent will have encircled the world and the star of Revelation will have taken his key to the bottomless pit and unleashed Abaddon and his minions to do their great, but terrible, work. The Zionist shill, Mitt Romney, on behalf of the Mormon daughter of the Jewish whore of Babylon, will sit on the throne of global power and rule from the White House in Washington, D.C. May God have mercy on us all.







Conspiracy of the Six-Pointed Star: Eye-Opening Revelations and Forbidden Knowledge About Israel, the Jews, Zionism, and the Rothschilds





Conspiracy World—A Truthteller’s Compendium of Eye-Opening Revelations and Forbidden Knowledge





Mysterious Monuments—Encyclopedia of Secret Illuminati Designs, Masonic Architecture, and Occult Places





Codex Magica—Secret Signs, Mysterious Symbols, and Hidden Codes of the Illuminati





Days of Hunger, Days of Chaos: The Coming Great Food Shortages in America





The Holocaust Hoax Exposed





The Ruling Elite—A Study in Imperialism, Genocide, and Emancipation





Handbook of Practical Disaster Preparedness For the Family





SAS Survival Handbook: For Any Climate, In Any Situation





The Gods of the Lodge





Bloodlines of the Illuminati





Mormonism, Masonry, and Godhood





Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion: The Classic on International Zionism









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













27 - Taxpayers Forced To Bailout Zionist Gangsters

The Financial Crisis On Wall Street & The Gang of Zionists Behind 9-11





By Christopher Bollyn

9-21-8





Ben Shalom Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, is the dedicated Zionist Jew behind the $85 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of Maurice Greenberg's criminal enterprise, A.I.G.





Adding Insult to Injury:

Hard-pressed American Taxpayers Forced to Bailout

Zionist Gangsters Behind 9-11

Updated September 21, 2008







Maurice Greenberg, the Zionist criminal behind A.I.G.,

is deeply involved in the false flag terror of 9-11.

[Photo: www.cloakanddagger.de]





The current financial crisis in the United States involves some of the very same Zionist criminals and entities that I pointed out in my recent chapter, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11."



The collapse of their criminal scams on Wall Street could result in more information coming out about the Zionist gangsters behind 9-11.

Such outrageous criminal scams cannot be kept hidden for long.



The government loan of $85 thousand millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars ($85 billion) to keep afloat Maurice Greenberg's criminal operation, American International Group (A.I.G.), brings into the spotlight one of the key individuals in the Zionist criminal network behind 9-11.





Maurice Greenberg

The criminal head of A.I.G.





THE DEVOTED ZIONIST BEHIND THE A.I.G. BAILOUT



It should come as no surprise that the key person behind this unprecedented government bailout of A.I.G., a huge Zionist criminal operation, is himself a devoted Zionist. Ben Shalom Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve System, is another Hebrew-speaking scion of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York City, like Michael Chertoff and Alvin K. Hellerstein.



How can it be that the sons of small group of uneducated Jews from Eastern Europe, who immigrated to the Bronx in the 1900s, now control a nation of 300 million non-Jews? If you were to ask a Zionist Jew from the Jewish Theological Seminary why they control America, they would probably say: "Because we can."





Bernanke has been a religious supporter

of Zionist criminals since the 1970s.



Growing up, Bernanke attended the extremist Zionist summer camp (Ramah) of the Jewish Theological Seminary where he was immersed for months in the Zionist ideology of the JTS - in Hebrew. During college in the early 1970s, Bernanke began working directly with the Jewish political crime bosses in South Carolina.





BERNANKE'S YEARS WITH THE CRIME BOSS OF DILLON



Ben Shalom (Hebrew for "Son of Peace") Bernanke went to Harvard University and graduated with a B.A. in economics in 1975. Throughout college, however, Bernanke had a very odd summer job for an Ivy League student of economics. Every summer he returned to Dillon, South Carolina, to work for Alan Heller Schafer, the well-known Jewish criminal and political boss who ran a sprawling roadside gambling and drinking establishment called South of the Border. The adjacent counties in North Carolina had been "dry counties" when Schafer originally started his drinking and gambling establishment.

Such was his clout that he was reportedly able to have the route of Interstate 95 altered so it would directly pass his saloon operation.







Alan Schafer

Bernanke's criminal employer during his college years.





Alan Schafer was, after all, the long-standing chairman of the Democratic Party in Dillon County, where, since 1966, he ran the "state's smoothest-running political machine" by buying votes.

Schafer's political machine maintained power, said Craig C. Donsanto, director of the Justice Department's Election Crimes Branch, through a "carefully controlled and sophisticated system of rigging elections," the New York Times reported in 1982. This is the crime boss that Bernanke worked for, every summer, while he studied at Harvard.



"Alan didn't want any more stump meetings because they threatened his candidates," said A.W. (Red) Bethea, 66, who was defeated four times in Statehouse races by Schafer-backed candidates. "If you were running against the Schafer machine without his wanting you to, you were just wasting your time."



Mr. Donsanto said more than 1,000 Dillon County voters were paid $5 to $10 to sign their names to absentee ballots in 1980. In the 1980 primary, 1,500 of the 7,000 votes cast in Dillon County were absentee ballots. Two days after the primary, agents from the U.S. Justice Dept. "swooped down on Dillon County and seized the ballot boxes, touching off the largest voting fraud investigation ever conducted in the Southeast," the Times reported.



After an 18-month investigation, 30 residents of Dillon County were indicted on charges of violating federal election laws, most of them for buying votes. As the head of the election corruption and vote- buying machine, Schafer was sentenced to three and a half years in federal prison. The joint state and federal investigation, which finally busted Schafer's political machine, "broke up the county's leadership elite, men who had controlled and manipulated Dillon's political process since the mid-1960s," the Times reported.



This was the well-known Jewish criminal that Ben Shalom Bernanke, a student of economics at Harvard, worked for every summer. It is simply impossible that Bernanke was unaware of Schafer's wide-scale criminal activities, which were legendary in the state. (Now, Bernanke is behind the $85 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of another Zionist criminal, Maurice R. Greenberg, who ran A.I.G. for decades and who owned some $15 billion worth of A.I.G. stock, before it fell some 94 percent in value.)



The "pain and embarrassment" caused by Schafer's decades of criminal activity aimed at controlling elections deeply affected the people of Dillon County.



After college, Bernanke earned a doctorate at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where his adviser was Stanley "Stan" Fischer.

Fischer, born in Rhodesia, also happens to be the current Governor of the Bank of Israel. If you look at Bernanke's biography you will find that he has spent his entire life engaged only in Zionist activities. I have not found any period of Bernanke's life when he was involved in anything other than Zionism.





Bernanke's advisor of Zionist economics at MIT was Stan Fischer,

head of the Bank of Israel; here with Ehud Olmert on April 1, 2008.

[Photo AP - Sebastian Scheiner]



(I am working on an article to explain the massive Zionist criminal enterprise of A.I.G., primarily owned by Maurice Greenberg. A.I.G. is much more than insurance fraud, and there is nothing "golden" about it, except for its Israeli subsidiary's name. Greenberg's criminal enterprise known as A.I.G. is sprawling and even includes a company (ILFC) that leases and finances aircraft for the airlines and secret government missions such as "enforced renditions."



One of Greenberg's aircraft, for example, a Gulfstream 4 with tail number N971L, was involved in the abduction of crew members who survived the Estonia catastrophe in September 1994. Greenberg's plane left Stockholm's Arlanda airport with half a dozen "unregistered passengers" and took them to Bangor, Maine, the day after 11 surviving crew members disappeared from Stockholm's Huddinge hospital.)



This is just a fragment of the criminal activity Greenberg's A.I.G. is involved in. As I wrote in one of the latest chapters of Solving 9-11, published in July 2008, Greenberg and A.I.G. are both involved in the 9-11 false flag terror attacks:





KROLL, GREENBERG & THE ISRAELIS



Rebuffed in 1987, the Mossad team of Malkin and Shalom didn't give up on Isser Harel's prophecy of 9-11, which meant getting the Port Authority security contract. They simply changed tack and decided to work in a less obvious manner, through dedicated and corrupt American Zionists like Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg. Shalom went to work for Kroll, according to the online 9/11 Encyclopedia entry for Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the CEO of the American International Group (A.I.G.) insurance company

In 1993, Maurice Greenberg became a partner and co-owner of Jules Kroll's company when A.I.G. bought 23 percent of Kroll. Greenberg is very close to Henry Kissinger, who became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987.



Greenberg was deeply involved in China in the 80s, where Henry Kissinger was one of his representatives, according to the 9-11 Encyclopedia. Through the China trade, Greenberg became close to Shaul Eisenberg, the leader of the Asian section of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, and agent for the sales of sophisticated military equipment to the Chinese military, it reports. Eisenberg was also the owner of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv...



Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll are connected to the key players of 9-11 in so many ways that their connections would fill a book. For the purpose of this chapter, however, there are a few key connections that need to be underlined:

1. Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll became partners in 1993, the same year Kroll Associates "was chosen over three other companies to advise the Port Authority on a redesign of its security procedures."

"We have such confidence in them that I have followed every one of their recommendations," Stanley Brezenoff, the Port Authority executive director, told the New York Times in 1994.



2. Kroll controlled security at the World Trade Center complex in 2001 and was responsible for hiring John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism for the FBI, who died on 9-11, reportedly his first day on the new job.



3. Greenberg's son, Jeffrey W. Greenberg, became CEO of Marsh & McLennan (MMC) in 1999 and chairman in 2000. The first plane of 9-11 flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA, part of Greenberg's company. Mark Wood, an eyewitness, said: "It looked like a mid-sized executive jet and the way it turned suggested it was being aimed deliberately at a target."

There is much more information about Maurice Greenberg's ties to 9-11 in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11."





Please support my research and writing.

Donate by Pay Pal to:

bollyn@bollynbooks.com



Sources:



Bollyn, Christopher, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," July 24, 2008

http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/911/theisraelinetworkbehind911/



Bollyn, Christopher, " 'Ghost Planes' Make Suspects Disappear: Pentagon has new secret weapon in 'War on Terror' " American Free Press, January 2004

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/ghost_planes.html



Bollyn, Christopher, "Were Key Survivors from Estonia Catastrophe Kidnapped?" January 2005

http://www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=133

New York Times, "Carolina Revives its Stump Meetings," May 23, 1982 (Article about Alan Schafer's criminal activities in Dillon County elections, S.C.)





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















28 - Edwin Wright - Zionist Jews Worked 'To Capture

The U.S. Government'



9-19-4



Edwin M. Wright was an intelligence agent and State Department employee in the 1940s and 1950s. Though an internationalist and an advocate of a plan for bringing refugee Jews to America, he saw clearly the danger posed by Zionism to the United States and to the world. His account of Jewish crimes and manipulations makes riveting reading. His personal experiences of Jewish bullying (and even impersonation!) of Presidents and officials, vote-buying, and much more are absolutely amazing and convincing. He's also an excellent writer. Excerpts follow:



"The material I gave Professor McKinzie was of a very controversial nature -- one almost taboo in U.S. circles, inasmuch as I accused the Zionists of using political pressures and even deceit in order to get the U.S. involved in a policy of supporting a Zionist theocratic, ethnically exclusive and ambitious Jewish State. I, and my associates in the State Department, felt this was contrary to U.S. interests and we were overruled by President Truman..."



"Zionists and Christian Fundamentalists have frequently used the Hebrew Bible as an authority for justifying a Jewish State. As late as summer 1976, Candidate Jimmie Carter stated, 'I am pro-Israeli, not because of political expediency, but because I believe Israel is the fulfilment of Biblical prophecy.'



"So the Bible-- and belief that it is God's Holy Word and infallible, became a useful tool in Zionist propaganda. I take the point of view that the Bible is a mixture of Hebrew legends and myths and cannot be used as an element in U.S. foreign policy."



"The Zionists were very successful in using religion for political purposes. This is prohibited by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states the Government should recognize no 'religous establishment.' In the case of Zionism and Israel, the U.S. has recognized and supported a religious establishment--viz: the State of Israel which in turn discriminates against all non-Jewish religions."



"Zionists, since Truman's decision in 1947-48, have lived in a Fool's Paradise. They assumed their control of the US government, press and public was permanent and based an 'moral' values -- therefore, the US at all times would give Israel total support. Zionists seem to live in a dream world of their own creation and think the rest of the world should accept their dream. They seem quite incapable of facing reality."



"Esther got her Gentile King drunk, then wheedled his signet ring and sent out an order to the Jews--so they slew 75,000 innocent Persians (Esther 9:16). The Book of Esther is not history. It is parody. The Ahasuerus of Esther is probably the Seleucid King Antiochus IV Epiphanes (165 B.C.) and Mordechai is probably a symbol for Judas Maccabeus. Esther represents the beautiful dream of a Messianic Jewish State. There is a lesson nevertheless in this immoral and violent story. A political marriage of any political power with Messianic Zionism is certain to produce disaster."



"Time is vindicating the point of view of those State Department specialists whom Truman said he could not trust because they were 'anti-Semitic.'"



"The third step in Zionism was that they must have large enough a state in order to keep the whole Jewish population there. At that time there were about fourteen million Jews, and now that meant owning a very large territory. It is not brought out in Zionist propaganda in America, but what they claim is all the territory from the Suez Canal clear north to the mountains of Cappadocia, in southern Turkey. [Statement by Herzl. Also see Numbers 34; Genesis 15:18, Joshua 13, II Samuel 8:5-6.} It includes all of Lebanon, much of Syria, Jordan, and Sinai. This is the territory they call 'Eretz Israel,' the land of Israel, which is mentioned in the Bible."



"I might mention here that I have found Zionism very deceitful. There is a double meaning in all the words Zionists use, and [Chaim] Weizmann himself said one time, 'Let the British or anyone else talk about Zionism and they can use our terminology, but we know what the meaning of it is. It has one meaning to us, one meaning to the Gentiles.' They've always had this double-entendre in everything that they have done. Whenever they use words you have to try to find out what is the context in which they are using these words."



"Domestic issues are not based on intelligence, but on self interest of a smaller group, and I think in this connection I think I should mention specifically two. One was what we called the China Lobby, a very odd and indiscriminate group of people who never were really organized, but had a tremendous influence upon government. They eventually were captured by Senator [Joseph R.] McCarthy. The other were the Zionists, who were more organized. They had been working for a long time to capture the U.S. Government; to use it for purposes of developing a Jewish state. In other words, we had two lobby groups in America who knew little about the area at all, who had certain ideological concepts of society and America. When the people from the fields reported what was unpopular to these groups, they were fired."



"...when the election was coming up in 1946 in New York, the group of New York Jews called upon Mr. Truman. [Alan Taylor, op. cit. p.93] Emmanuel Cellar was the head of this committee. Rabbi Steven Wise and several others were in it. They called upon Mr. Truman and said, 'We have just been talking with Mr. [Tom] Thomas Dewey. He is willing to come out and declare for a Jewish state, and we are going to turn our money and urge the Jews to vote for him unless you beat him to it.' Then Emmanuel Cellar pounded upon Mr. Truman's desk and said, 'And if you don't come out for a Jewish state we'll run you out of town.'"



"Henry Byroade made a talk in Philadelphia in April 1954. ...In it he made this statement: 'I have some advice for both Arabs and for Jews. Israel should think of itself as a state living in the Middle East and that it must live with its Arab neighbors. The Arabs must cease to think of themselves as wanting to destroy Israel and should come to terms with Israel itself.' ...The next morning Henry Byroade got a call from Nathan Goldman, who was in California. [Nathan Goldman was president of the World Jewish Congress and many years president of the World Zionist Organization...] He used his first name and said, 'Hank, did you make that speech in Philadelphia that was reported in the papers today?'



"Byroade said, 'Yes, I made that speech.'



"He said, 'We will see to it that you'll never hold another good position.'"



"The Zionists are organized in 17 (now 31) different committees and groups in America. They are all inter-related by what's called the Association of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. These are the presidents of the 31 Zionist organizations. All they have to do is to send in a letter to any one of them and these 31 will reproduce it in mimeograph and send it out to all their organizations. As a result of one letter you'll get hundreds of replies coming in attacking me. This is the type of constant fear that a Government official lives under because of the mimeograph machine and the xerox machine."



"Mr. Truman himself has the most remarkable of all statements in there, a memo that's quoted, in which he says, 'Something's going on and I don't know what it is. Somebody called up the President of Haiti and he said that it was I. [F.R.U.S., 1947 , Vol. V, p. 1309.] He said, "We want you to vote for the Zionist program." As a result the President of Haiti changed his vote to satisfy what he thought was me. I don't know who this fellow was that called him up.'



"In other words, somebody impersonated President Truman and threatened the President of Haiti. There were people who used President Truman's voice and name and he didn't know who they were. The State Department never found out who they were, but this is the way decisions are made in Washington. I think I know who that fellow was. It was Robert Nathan, because I met Robert Nathan frequently at the U.N. I had met him out in the Middle East, and he was the one who was running to the telephone booth and calling up the President of Liberia, calling up Costa Rica, telling them, "Unless you will vote for our program, we will see to it that the American interhighway system is not built through your country." These people assumed that Nathan and Co. were acting for America and nobody had consulted them at all. This kind of thing went on at the U.N. and in Washington and if you want the documentary proof of it, it's in Mr. Truman's statement.



"Before I read this statement of Mr. Truman's I'll have to explain what the situation was. There was tremendous pressure upon the governments of other countries to vote for the partition program, which the Zionists had accepted. I was at the U.N. and was Mr. Henderson's assistant and was there when he read some of these memos. I was reporting back to the State Department what was happening at the U.N.



"There were a number of Jewish Zionists at the U.N., like Robert Nathan, Bernard Baruch, and various other people, who were calling up the chiefs of other states and saying, "Unless you vote for this partition program, the United States will not build a road in your country; will not help you in aid or will not do something else." They were pretending they had the authority of the President of the United States to determine policy, when they were just one individual operating on their own. They had no authority, no official position, but they were using the importance of the United States as a threat against these countries."



"That's an official document. Somebody represented himself as the President of the United States to some foreign countries. This was the kind of threat that the Zionists used to change votes at that last session when finally it was voted by a small majority of two or three."



"It's very rare that a country of which no boundaries are known is recognized. There are also other questions: When you recognize a state do you recognize its claims to people outside the state? The Zionists have always claimed that the Jewish nation is wherever a Jew is, anywhere in the world. Every Jew, therefore, is part of this Jewish nation. Golda Meir repeated this when they asked her what the boundaries of Israel are. She said, 'Wherever there's a Jew, there is Israel. It's not a line on a map.'"



"'Constantly they kept asking me, "Why does the United States behave this way?" I couldn't explain it to them.'



"Nobody can explain it, because you've got to know how they buy congressional and senatorial votes through speeches; how they control the five electoral states, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, etc. You have to understand the weighting of the Jewish vote in America and the contribution to the party systems. By the time we explained that to Arabs they'd say, 'But aren't you corrupt?'



The answer is, 'Yes, we're corrupt.'"



Source: Truman Presidential Library



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













29 - Israel - A History Of Hate Crimes





By Reverend Ted Pike

5-27-8



Israel provided a textbook example of a "hate crime" when Orthodox Jews gathered and publicly burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles last week. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, architect of hate crimes laws worldwide, says a hate crime occurrs whenever violation of the law is motivated by bias against an identifiable protected group of people (like Jews, Muslims, or homosexuals). It also says it is a hate crime to desecrate or destroy the sacred books of another religion.



The deputy mayor of Or Jehuda, in southern Israel, was obviously motivated by bias against Christianity and its sacred book, the New Testament. Because of his bias, he incited dozens of Jewish religious students to burn the Christian scriptures. According to ADL criteria, this was a hate crime.



ADL-Israel's public relations rep to the world-holds up the Jewish state as a model of judicial fairness and perspective. If ADL were consistent, it would require from Israel the same responsibility to pursue hate crime indictments as elsewhere. It would pressure the government of Israel to indict the deputy mayor and all who participated. Yet ADL, in its recent press statement, doesn't hint that Bible burning in Israel is a hate crime.







Unequal Punishment







ADL hate laws demand that Christians in Canada, Australia, Europe and America be punished with triple penalties if their "homophobia" motivates an infraction of the law. If ADL were true to its own principles, it would demand similar harsh penalties for the "Israeli Bible-burners."



After all, that's what ADL's national executive board member (Philly DA Lynne Abraham) wanted to give 11 Christians for the "hate crime" of peaceful witnessing to homosexuals in 2004. (See, "Eleven Christians Jailed For Criticizing Homosexuality") She wanted 47 years in prison and a $90,000 fine each in punishment! Shouldn't ADL demand that the Israeli Bible-burners be similarly punished?



The least ADL should require from Israeli authorities is the same harsh penalties its Canadian hate laws impose on Christians. One victim of ADL wrath was Toronto printer Scott Brockie who refused to print homosexual literature. Legal entanglements cost him at least $171,000; he was bankrupted.



I'm only talking about what would make ADL consistent with its own perverse definitions and punishments.



Of course, it is highly unlikely ADL would ever actively pursue hate criminal charges against fellow Jews. Prosecution of Jews (and blacks) has occurred only very rarely in the dozens of countries where hate laws have ruled for decades.







Justice in Israel?







I don't think the Israeli Bible-burners should be punished at all ­ except in the court of public opinion. In that forum, their hateful attitudes and actions deserve the contempt of humanity. But they merit no physical punishment. People shouldn't be punished for motivation or beliefs but only for illegal actions. There was no crime in Or Jehuda. The townspeople freely received the New Testaments from Messianic missionaries; ostensibly, they freely relinquished them to the Orthodox Jews. These Jews had the right to burn their own property. No one was defrauded or physically harmed. The case should end there.



It probably will. Yes, the Israeli government will offer a pretense of disapproval, just as ADL's recent press release condemns the burning. But after the brouhaha dies down, as usually happens in Israel, almost nothing will be done to punish these Jews; they violated the norms of free western society but not the ethics of Talmudic Judaism. The Talmud commands the New Testament be burned! Deputy Mayor Uzzi Aharon, a devout Talmudic Jew, was, as he said,

ticle%2FShowFull&cid=1211288128832>only fulfilling a "commandment" of Judaism. (1)







Protecting Israel from Criticism







Why does no one describe the book burning as a hate crime? Why is the popular media ignoring this story? Except for Associated Press, it was blacked out from all big Jewish print and TV media in America.(See, "Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish") If Christians publicly burned the Talmud, the Jewish media would have a heyday, screaming, "Hate crime!" It could become the pretext for a renewed thrust to pass the ADL federal hate bill in Congress. The Jewish media is silent because it and ADL want to avoid any hint that in Israel hate crimes against Christians or Palestinians abound.(See, "Christians in Israel: An Endangered Species" and "Israel: Founded On Terror")



Also, the world has not been taught to apply to Israel the same standards of responsibility that apply to the rest of us. Israel drove 800,000 Arabs from their land and properties in 1948, bans effective evangelism and free speech for Christians, deprives 10,000 Arab prisoners of legal rights of due process, tortures a high percentage of those prisoners (See, "Torture in Israeli Prisons"), militarily violates the sovereignty of neighboring states through land and airspace invasion, seizes political fugitives in foreign nations at will, builds thousands of homes on properties that belong to others, etc.



That's all right for Israel, the Christian west asserts, because Israel is special: specially blessed by God with special exemption from criticism, victims of a special magnitude of persecution and suffering above all others, our special Mid-East ally, recipients of special billions in foreign aid, existing in special jeopardy, etc.



How long will it be before Israel accepts the fact that, to be a responsible nation among such nations, she must live by the same civilized rules and values as the rest? Israel will never condescend to such limitations on her own. Only international outrage and intolerance of her misbehavior will compel her to accept such responsibility.



Yes, Arabs have committed many violent hate crimes against Israelis. Yet the whole history of Israel's injustice, discrimination, and violence against Palestinians abundantly fulfills ADL's definition of a hate crime. Motivated by Talmudic racism, Israel has committed thousands of acts of violence against Palestinians; this record is a grotesque tangle of violent hate crimes over at least six decades. Virtually none of these hate crimes has ever been brought to justice.(2)



And they continue to this moment. Former President Jimmy Carter recently said Israel's embargo of food, water, electricity, and medical and humanitarian aid to the men, women, children, elderly, and infirm of Gaza is "one of the greatest human rights crimes on earth." (3) What is this but Israel's bias causing violation of international law - one huge national hate crime?







Israel Can't Judge Others







For the last several years, Knesset has considered legislation empowering Israel to demand that other nations deport those accused of questioning the number of Jewish Holocaust dead. Jewish legislators say such "defamation" of the dead is a hate crime against Jews that should be tried and punished in Israel.



Yet something must happen long before ADL and Jerusalem presume to become hate crime lawgivers to the nations: They should punish hate crimes in their own house. They should question the sacred authority of the medieval Babylonian Talmud, which is true "hate literature." The Talmud has incited increased persecution of Messianic Jews in southern Israel over the past several years; it has proven its power to violently radicalize already extremist Jewish groups; it stimulates acts of desecration and even homegrown terrorism. Messianics are harassed daily while police look on. Their meeting places have been torched; recently, a package bomb was opened by a Messianic child, exploding in his face and severely injuring him.



Israel should also distance herself from her hate crime record by condemning some of the most violent, bias-motivated hate criminals of the 20th century: Prime Ministers David Ben-Gurion, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, and Ariel Sharon. (See, "Israel: Founded On Terror")



Considering Israel's history of hate crimes, it is out of the question that she and her PR representative, ADL, should moralize about hate crimes or enforce hate laws to the world.











Endnotes:



1. In Shabbethai 116, Rabbi Tarbon says: "The writings of the minim [Christians] deserve to be burned, even though the holy name of God occurs therein, for paganism is less dangerous that minuth [Christianity]: the former fails to recognize the truth of Judaism from want of knowledge, but the latter denies what it fully knows."



The footnote to Abodah Zarah 116b (pg. 84 of the Soncino edition) says that "minuth" refers to "heresy with special reference to Christianity."



2. The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, by Palestinian Christian lawyer and diplomat Dr. Issa Nakhleh documents more than a thousand bias-motivated, ethnic hate crimes of Israelis against the British and Arabs. Nakleh obtained these from British archives of 1939-48 and United Nations records up to 1998. This two-volume reference work is available in most university libraries or from Intercontinental Books, PO Box 756, Grand Central Station, NY, NY 10163-0756.



3. Interview in The Guardian, cited in The Jerusalem Post, 5/26/2008: "Ex-U.S. President: Israel Has 150 Nukes."





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













ED NOTE : I am afraid this line - We are not always perfect or a "Light to the Nations" - is not a joke !!













30 - The Jewish Gangsters in America





By Gad Nahshon

JewishPost.com

4-25-2



"These are the conclusions from Rich Cohen's exciting to read book:

'Tough Jews' is a fascinating read back into the history of organized

crime," wrote Martin Scorcese. And Mario Cuomo defined this book as

"unusually entertaining". Larry King, a friend of the family, said, "WOW.

What a book. . . You do not have to be Jewish to love Tough Jews."





Arnold Rothstein was the founding father of American organized crime. He was murdered in 1928. He left a legend and a myth and also a tribe of notorious "boys": Louis Lepke Buchalter, the first builder of an empire of crimes which produced in 1940 around $2 million a year, Meyer Lansky, Bugsy Siegal, Dutch Schultz, Abraham Twist Kid Reles, Pep Strauss, Mendy Weiss, Gurrah Shapiro, Red Levine and many others.



They were Jews, criminals and murderers. They also did not hesitate to murder other Jews who dared to challenge them in the underworld. They left a "legacy" to be followed by the Italian "disciples" of Rothstein: Lucky Luciano, Joe Adonis, Louis Capone, Albert Anastasia and many others.



A young writer, Rich Cohen, decided to expose the role of these Jews in the history of organized crime in America. But he also illuminated these Jews in a sort of romantic-nostalgic light.



Cohen is an excellent writer and a superb story teller. He conducted research of his own and produced a fascinating account of the life of these criminal Jews. His book: "Tough Jews, Fathers, Sons and Gangsters" (Simon and Schuster, 1998, New York) will stir debate about the "contribution" of Jews to America.



First: Jews do not tend to be only white collar kind of criminals. They can be cruel murderers.



Second, Jews invented organized crime.



Third, Jews were the first ones to describe themselves as businessmen. They turned the crime into business and they built a network of crimes: gambling, prostitution, smuggling, extortion and protection money.



Fourth, sad to say they were the first drug dealers in America!!



Fifth, they were often "good Jews". They went to synagogue and they defended Jews against American Nazis and anti-Semites.



These are the conclusions from Rich Cohen's exciting to read book: "Tough Jews is a fascinating read back into the history of organized crime," wrote Martin Scorcese. And Mario Cuomo defined this book as "unusually entertaining". Larry King, a friend of the family, said, "WOW. What a book. . . You do not have to be Jewish to love Tough Jews."



He is right. The book is rich with engrossing, vivid, violent anecdotes. Cohen covered the era from 1918 to 1950.



These Jews grew up in the Jewish ghettos of America and especially in Brooklyn or Brownsville. As a special tribe, Cohen illuminated, they disappear. Why? Because they sent their children to the colleges, rather than to the streets. The Italians were the ones to develop families or dynasties of organized crime.



But it looks as if the Jews taught them the secret art of organized crime. Cohen does not have a background in criminal justice and he ignored the famous book by Jenna Weismann Joselit: "Our Gang" (1900-1940). So we need more material to understand the unique characteristics of "Jewish crime". Also, he did not mention the film "Lepke" (Buchalter) with Tony Curtis in the major role.



Cohen also compared the "toughness" of the Jewish gangsters with the art of the Israeli commando in Entebbe (give me a break).



Cohen tried to revise our attitude to these Jews. Well they were criminals, period. Many Jews today are sensitive to these kind of stories about crimes. Well we should be more mature. We are not always perfect or a "Light to the Nations". But we should not give medals to Jews such as Abe Reles, for example.



Cohen also tried to present these Jews as an example of "Pride Jews" but the criminals did not go to fight against Hitler in World War II.



Rich Cohen grew up in Glencoe, Illinois. He attended Tulane University in New Orleans and spent his junior year at Oxford University in England. His first job after college was with The New Yorker where he wrote a number of stories, mostly humorous pieces, that ran in "Notes and Comment" and "Talk of the Town." After two years at The New Yorker he became a staff writer at The New York Observer, writing "mostly funny stories about mostly serious people." Less than a year later, he was offered a contract by Rolling Stone magazine where he's now a contributing editor.



At Rolling Stone, he has written stories on the Rolling Stones, Alicia Silverstone, Tom Clancy, Pat Buchanan, and Howard Stern, among other notable subjects. He continues to write articles and humor pieces for The New York Times, The New Yorker, New York magazine, Spy, and Details. He lives in New York City.



'Tough Jews, Fathers, Sons and Gangsters' By Rich Cohen Simon and Schuster, 1998, New York



http://www.jewishpost.com/jp0404/jpn0404a.htm



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













31 - The 'God' That Serves Elite Jews

By Henry Makow PhD

2-18-7





Last week, I noted that the Soviets razed thousands of churches but spared synagogues.



If Communists considered religion "the opium of the masses," why didn't they include Judaism? I asked. Do Christians and Jews worship the same God? Is there an affinity between Communism and Judaism? (http://www.savethemales.ca/001913.html)



Perhaps the Jewish elite has a different God. A reader, "George," knew the heiress of a rich Jewish banking family "not the Rothschilds, although her family dwelt in a palace neighbouring the Rothschilds."



"Leah was one of my classmates in the Geneva University (Switzerland) where I was studying psychology ...She was an attractive blue-eyed blond lady. ...As she was wearing a Star of David, I asked if she was a believer. She answered "yes and no" and added that she believed in a god of the Jews who was serving the Jews rather than served by them. I immediately asked whether she was speaking of an egregore ...Her only response was "yes" and she broke that conversation. Never again did we mention the subject."



According to Wikipedia, "egregore" is an occult concept representing a "thought form" or "collective group mind", an autonomous psychic entity made up of, and influencing, the thoughts of a group of people. The symbiotic relationship between an egregore and its group has been compared to the more recent, non-occult concepts of the corporation (as a legal entity) and the meme.



George speculates that elite Jews created the Jewish God as their "egregore," i.e. an instrument of their collective will, i.e. their desire to vanquish the heathens and rule supreme.



"Could it be possible that the ancient Levite priests found a way to create a supernatural entity from the collective mind of the tribe of Judah? An entity born from a collective mind the Levites were shaping into self-isolationism and segregationist a.k.a, extreme ethno- centrism? ...An entity designed to help the "chosen people" destroy the "alien" nations and provide it with material rewards? An entity resulting from the black magic [kabala] of the Levite priests who, as the first indoctrinated atheists, were denying the universal God of Moses because they didn't want to submit to a "Lord and Master" but rather become themselves "Lords and Masters" through their slavish "egregorious" god?"



This "egregore" is Lucifer, and elite Jews have made him the master meme of the New World Order. The elite Jews are the "Communist Capitalist International", the intermarried German Jewish banking families who, according to Christian Rakovsky include the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Schiffs and many others. http://www.savethemales.ca/ 000280.html



They have also intermarried with the corrupt gentile elites of Europe and America, many of whom think they are Jews. http://www.savethemales.ca/000447.html





THE DEPRAVED SPIRIT



Since the Jewish egregore is also behind the New World Order, we should recall that according to this mindset, only the subscribers ("believers") are human; everyone else is an animal to be exploited and/or slaughtered.



Nicholas Lysson, in his brilliant essay on the Ukrainian Holocaust ("Holomidor,") provides examples of this "us-vs-them" thinking in the Talmud and the Old Testament. For example: Isaiah 60:12 (" . . .The nation and kingdom that will not serve [Israel] shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted" ); Isaiah 61:5-6 (". . .Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks. . . : Ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles. . .")



Lysson continues (http://www.savethemales.ca/001863.html):



"The ethnocentric hostility of the Jews-consistently commented on by the peoples who have encountered them over the millennia-can be traced ultimately to the origins of Judaism as set forth in the Torah, e.g., Genesis 9:25 ("Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren"); Exodus 17:14-16 and 34:12-13 ; Numbers 24:8 ("God. . . shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows"), 25:6-13 (wherein God commends Phineas for his initiative in running a javelin through both parties to a marriage of Jew and gentile), 31:7-19 and 33:50-56; and Deuteronomy 2:33-35 ("[on God's command] we. . . utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain"), 3:4-7, 7:1-5 ("thou shalt. . . utterly destroy them"), 7:14-26 ("thine eye shall have no pity"), 20:10-17 ("thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth") and 25:19."



ANTI SEMITISM



It doesn't take a genius to recognize that this "egregore" is the cause of anti Semitism. Jewish leaders use anti Semitism to manipulate Jews who are taught they are reviled for no reason. The real reasons for anti Semitism are hidden from them and from Christians as well



As Nicholas Lysson points out, the most damning passages of the Talmud are toned down or not translated. Information about the "Arendar" system is suppressed. This system caused the massacre of perhaps 250,000 Jews by the Ukrainian Cossack Bohdan Khmelnytsky in 1648-1654:



"The Jews at the time of the massacres were serving the Polish szlachta (nobility) and Roman Catholic clergy on their Ukrainian latifundia as arendars-toll-, rent- and tax-farmers, enforcers of corvee obligations, licensees of feudal monopolies (e.g., on banking, milling, storekeeping, and distillation and sale of alcohol), and as anti-Christian scourges who even collected tithes at the doors of the peasants' Greek Orthodox churches and exacted fees to open those doors for weddings, christenings and funerals. They had life and death powers over the local population (the typical form of execution being impalement), and no law above them to which that population had recourse... the arendars leased estates for terms of only two or three years and had every incentive to wring the peasants mercilessly, without regard to long-term consequences."



Jews are still told that these pogroms were due to gratuitous hatred. Thus the egregore dynamic is perpetuated as ordinary Jews support Zionist policies. For example, they clamour to bomb Iran, regardless of the disastrous consequences. http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=3978



(For how this form of manipulation is now used to control Americans, See "The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror" and "The Zionist Protection Racket" at www.savethemales.ca)



In the above-mentioned essay, Nicholas Lysson says the Jewish leadership actively provoke anti Semitism because it is indispensable for Jewish cohesion and survival. Does this mean that, without its "egregore" i.e. its predatoryagenda, Jews would have no corporate raison d'etre? Of course this is kept secret from the rank-and-file Jews. This is comparable to Freemasonry, which Rakowsky says is designed to bring about "the triumph of Communism." (http://www.savethemales.ca/000280.html)





THE COMMUNIST EGREGORE



The greatest mass slaughter in history was not the Jewish holocaust but the Ukrainian Holodomor. By Stalin's own estimate, ten million Ukrainians died, mostly at the hands of Bolshevik Jews.



Lysson's account suggests that this was the result of a centuries-long feud in which Jews failed to recognize their common humanity with non-Jews. This continues today as the murderous record of the 20th century is overshadowed by Jewish losses, as if only Jews were human.



The Holodomor took place because the Bolsheviks confiscated all the grain. Lysson writes: "A quarter of the rural population, men, women and children, lay dead or dying in a great stretch of territory with some forty million inhabitants, like one vast Belsen. The rest, in various stages of debilitation, had no strength to bury their families or neighbours. [As at Belsen] well-fed squads of police or party officials supervised the victims."



The extermination of the Ukrainian Kulaks was directed from the Kremlin where the Bolshevik leadership lived together and maintained a fraternal atmosphere suffused by their fervent collectivist idealism i.e. their egregore. This is how historian Simon Sebag Montefiore describes the scene in the Kremlin during the Holomodor. (Of course he doesn't mention that most of the main players were Jews.)



"This pitiless fraternity lived in a sleepless frenzy of excitement and activity, driven by adrenalin and conviction. Regarding themselves like God on the first day, they were creating a new world in a red-hot frenzy... " ("Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar", p. 40)





CONCLUSION



The Soviets didn't raze synagogues because Communism was an expression of the Jewish "egregore." Christians and Jews apparently do not worship the same God. The Christian God represented by Jesus is universal love and brotherhood. The Jewish God has been supplanted by a Cabalistic egregore that "serves" elite Jews. It represents their ruthless sociopathic urge for world dominion. The same egregore--the desire to supplant God-- animates the New World Order.



The average Communist Jew or non-Jew was an idealistic dupe. Marxism, equality etc. were just window dressing to hide the real agenda: the destruction of race, religion, family and nation; the accumulation of all wealth and the enslavement of mankind. The methods have changed but the agenda has not.



The average Zionist is also an idealistic dupe. As many now realize, "the Jewish Homeland" was merely a step toward world government, "an incident in a far reaching plan" to use banker Louis Marshall's words. Christian Zionists are the biggest dupes of all.



The same ersatz idealism infuses the world government movement, which is full of pious opportunists who have sold their heritage for a seat at the globalist banquet.



In many cases, the charge of "anti semitism" and "hate" are devious attempts to outlaw opposition to Tyranny. Let's not kid ourselves. We are facing a diabolical Evil, ruthless, vicious and cunning as well. Jews and non-Jews must join hands to banish Lucifer and declare that only God is God, He is Moral and we serve Him.



---------



Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------





















32 - The 'Holocaust' Versus The Holodomor

4-16-9



The word Holocaust has been registered as a key element of the Jewish-Zionist brand, and is not permitted to be used for any other actual man-made catastrophes, even those caused by Jews.



Kaganovich and the Holodomor



Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (1893 ­1991) was a Soviet politician and administrator and a close associate of Joseph Stalin.



Kaganovich was born in 1893 to Jewish parents. In the 1930s.. he also oversaw the destruction of many of the city's oldest monuments including the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour. In 1932, he led the ruthless suppression of the workers' strike in Ivanovo-Voznesensk.



Kaganovich.. actively encouraged the policies of collectivization that according to many historians led to the catastrophic 1932-33 Ukrainian famine (the Holodomor), in which millions of Ukrainians died. Similar policies also inflicted enormous suffering on the Soviet Central Asian republic of Kazakhstan, the Kuban region, Crimea, the lower Volga region, and other parts of the Soviet Union. As an emissary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, Kaganovich traveled to Ukraine, the Central region of Russia, the Northern Caucasus, and Siberia demanding the acceleration of collectivization and repressions against the kulaks, who were generally used as scapegoats for the slow progress of collectivization, and their supporters. In his book, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivisation and the Terror-Famine, Robert Conquest named Kaganovich together with other Stalinist leaders of the USSR as having personal responsibility for the artificial famine.



The American journalist Eugene Lyons was sent to Russia in 1928 as chief correspondent for the United Press agency. Arriving as an enthusiastic communist, he was able to experience the Soviet experiment at first hand. He became totally disillusioned. He described the famine in his book Assignment in Utopia (published in 1937) in the following terms:



"Hell broke loose in seventy thousand Russian villages.. A population as large as all of Switzerland's or Denmark's was stripped clean of all their belongings.. They were herded with bayonets at railroad stations, packed indiscriminately into cattle cars and freight cars and dumped weeks later in the lumber regions of the frozen North, the deserts of central Asia, wherever labor was needed, there to live or die..". The number of people that died is unknown, but the famine alone is estimated conservatively to have been responsible for 6 million deaths, almost half of them children (*Conquest, p 303-4). Other millions died from the killings and sickness as a result of the deportations (*p 304-7).



At the famous Yalta conference in 1945, Winston Churchill was able to question his friend and fellow ally Stalin about the process. Stalin said 'ten million' had been 'dealt with', but that it had been 'absolutely necessary'. Churchill records that he 'sustained the strong impression of millions of men and women being blotted out or displaced forever' (*Churchill, The Second World War, vol. IV p448). However Churchill ­ (thank God for Winston Churchill!) - had no further thoughts or comment to make on the matter, or his own decision to approve Stalin as his ally in the war, more than half a dozen years after the Holodomor which had been reported as it happened in the Manchester Guardian and by British writers such as Aldous Huxley and Malcolm Muggeridge before the war began. After all, the war began after Britain gave a guarantee to Poland to come to the latter's aid should Polish security be infringed, and after Germany took the western half of Poland and Stalin the eastern half, Britain only declared war on Germany, and then at the Yalta Conference Britain was party to Roosevelt's handing over the whole of eatsern Europe INCLUDING Poland, to Stalin. So WW2 in Europe was just a big scam..



Lyons, himself Jewish, credits the Jewish commissar Lazar Kaganovich with the major portion of responsibility for the major crime against humanity that the Holodomor represents:



"Lazar Kaganovich it was his mind that invented the Political Departments to lead collectivized agriculture, his iron hand that applied Bolshevik mercilessness." (*Lyons, p 578). The Encyclopaedia Britannica says tersely, "(Kaganovich) was one of the small group of Stalin's top advisors pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929.. Within the Politburo, Kaganovich and Molotov led the opposition to Kirov's proposed concessions to the peasantry and to his attempts to relax the harshness of Stalin's control.. (Kaganovich) opposed Krushchev's de-Stalinization..". Kaganovich died at the ripe old age of 98 in 1991 (Encl. Brit.), ethnically safe from pursuit by the Israeli secret service, the Simon Wiesenthal organization, the New York media-intelligentsia or other hunters of real or imagined war criminals or human rights violators.



Wikipedia: "The Holodomor is the name of the famine that ravaged the rural population of Soviet Ukraine in 1932-1933 agricultural season and occurred parallel to devastating famines in other regions of the USSR. The famine was caused by the food requisition actions carried by Soviet authorities. The Holodomor is considered one of the greatest national catastrophes to affect the Ukrainian nation in modern history where millions of inhabitants of Ukraine died of starvation in an unprecedented peacetime catastrophe. The origins of the word Holodomor come from the Ukrainian words holod, 'hunger', and mor, 'plague', possibly from the expression moryty holodom, 'to inflict death by hunger'



In 2008 the European Parliament has recognized the Holodomor as a crime against humanity.





Truth, History And Integrity

By Gilad Atzmon

Back in 2007 the notorious American Jewish right-wing organization, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League) announced that it recognised the events in which an estimated 1.5 million Armenians were massacred as "genocide." The ADL's national director, Abraham Foxman, insisted that he made the decision after discussing the matter with 'historians'. For some reason he failed to mention who the historians were, nor did he refer to their credibility or field of scholarship. However, Foxman also consulted with one holocaust survivor who supported the decision. It was Elie Wiesel, not known for being a leading world expert on the Armenian ordeal.



The idea of a Zionist organization being genuinely concerned, or even slightly moved, by other people's suffering could truly be a monumental transforming moment in Jewish history. However, this week we learned that the ADL is once again engaged in the dilemma of Armenian suffering. It is not convinced anymore that the Armenians suffered that much. It is now lobbying the American congress not to recognize the killings of Armenians as 'genocide. This week saw the ADL "speaking out againstCongressional acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide, and is, instead, advocating Turkey's call for a historical commission to study the events."



How is it that an event that took place a century ago is causing such a furor? One day it is generally classified as 'genocide', the next, it is demoted to an ordinary instance of one man killing another. Was it an 'historical document' that, out of nowhere, popped out on Abe Foxman's desk? Are there some new factual revelations that led to such a dramatic historical shift? l don't think so.



The ADL's behaviour is a glimpse into the notion of Jewish history and the Jewish understanding of the past. For the nationalist and political Jew, history is a pragmatic tale, it is an elastic account. It is foreign to any scientific or academic method. Jewish history transcends itself beyond factuality, truthfulness or

correspondence rules with any given vision of reality. It also repels integrity or ethics. It by far prefers total submission, instead of creative and critical thinking. Jewish history is a phantasmic tale that is there to make the Jews happy and the Goyim behave themselves. It is there to serve the interests of one tribe and that tribe only. In practice, from a Jewish perspective, the decision whether there was an Armenian genocide or not is subject to Jewish interests: is it good for the Jews or is it good for Israel.



Interestingly enough, history is not a particularly 'Jewish thing'. It is an established fact that not a single Jewish historical text has been written between the 1st century (Josephus Flavius) and early 19th century (Isaak Markus Jost). For almost 2 thousand years Jews were not interested in their own or anyone else's past, at least not enough to chronicle it. As a matter of convenience, an adequate scrutiny of the past was never a primary concern within the Rabbinical tradition. One of the reasons is probably that there was no need for such a methodical effort. For the Jew who lived during ancient times and the Middle Ages, there was enough in the Bible to answer the most relevant questions to do with day-to-day life, Jewish meaning and fate. As Israeli historian Shlomo Sand puts it, "a secular chronological time was foreign to the 'Diaspora time' that was shaped by the anticipation for the coming of the Messiah."



However, in the mid 19th century, in the light of secularisation, urbanisation, emancipation and due to the decreasing authority of the Rabbinical leaders, an emerging need of an alternative cause rose amongst the awakening European Jews. All of a sudden, the emancipated Jew had to decide who he was and where he came from. He also started to speculate what his role might be within the rapidly opening Western society.



This is where Jewish history in its modern form was invented. This is also where Judaism was transformed from a world religion into a 'land registry' with some clearly devastating racially orientated and expansionist implications. As we know, Shlomo Sand's account of the 'Jewish Nation' as a fictional invention is yet to be challenged academically. However, the dismissal of factuality or commitment to truthfulness is actually symptomatic of any form of contemporary Jewish collective ideology and identity politics. The ADL's treatment of the Armenian topic is just one example. The Zionist's dismissal of a Palestinian past and heritage is just another example. But in fact any Jewish collective vision of the past is inherently Judeo-centric and oblivious to any academic or scientific procedure.



When I was Young



When I was young and naïve I regarded history as a serious academic matter. As I understood it, history had something to do with truth seeking, documents, chronology and facts. I was convinced that history aimed to convey a sensible account of the past based on methodical research. I also believed that it was premised on the assumption that understanding the past may throw some light over our present and even help us to shape a prospect of a better future. I grew up in the Jewish state and it took me quite a while to understand that the Jewish historical narrative is very different. In the Jewish intellectual ghetto, one decides what the future ought to be, then one constructs 'a past' accordingly. Interestingly enough, this exact method is also prevalent amongst Marxists. They shape the past so it fits nicely into their vision of the future. As the old Russian joke says, "when the facts do not conform with the Marxist ideology, the Communist social scientists amend the facts (rather than revise the theory)".



When I was young, I didn't think that history was a matter of political decisions or agreements between a rabid Zionist lobby and its favorite holocaust survivor. I regarded historians as scholars who engaged in adequate research following some strict procedures. When I was young I even considered becoming an historian.



When I was young and naive I was also somehow convinced that what they told us about our 'collective' Jewish past really happened. I believed it all, the Kingdom of David, Massada, and then the Holocaust: the soap, the lampshade*, the death march, the six million.



As it happened, it took me many years to understand that the Holocaust, the core belief of the contemporary Jewish faith, was not at all an historical narrative for historical narratives do not need the protection of the law and politicians. It took me years to grasp that my great-grandmother wasn't made into a 'soap' or a 'lampshade'*. She probably perished out of exhaustion, typhus or maybe even by mass shooting. This was indeed bad and tragic enough, however not that different from the fate of many millions of Ukrainians who learned what communism meant for real. "Some of the worst mass murderers in history were Jews" writes ZionistSever Plocker on the Israeli Ynet disclosing the Holodomor and Jewish involvement in this colossal crime, probably the greatest crime of the 20th century. The fate of my great-grandmother was not any different from hundreds of thousands of German civilians who died in an orchestrated indiscriminate bombing, because they were Germans. Similarly, people in Hiroshima died just because they were Japanese. 1 million Vietnamese died just because they were Vietnamese and 1.3 million Iraqis died because they were Iraqis. In short the tragic circumstances of my great grandmother wasn't that special after all.



It Doesn't make sense



It took me years to accept that the Holocaust narrative, in its current form, doesn't make any historical sense. Here is just one little anecdote to elaborate on:



If, for instance, the Nazis wanted the Jews out of their Reich (Judenrein - free of Jews), or even dead, as the Zionist narrative insists, how come they marched hundreds of thousands of them back into the Reich at the end of the war? I have been concerned with this simple question for more than a while. I eventually launched into an historical research of the topic and happened to learn from Israeli holocaust historian professor Israel Gutman that Jewish prisoners actually joined the march voluntarily. Here is a testimony taken from Gutman's book



"One of my friends and relatives in the camp came to me on the night of the evacuation and offered a common hiding place somewhere on the way from the camp to the factory. The intention was to leave the camp with one of the convoys and to escape near the gate, using the darkness we thought to go a little far from the camp. The temptation was very strong. And yet, after I considered it all I then decided to join (the march) with all the other inmates and to share their fate " (Israel Gutman [editor], People and Ashes: Book Auschwitz - Birkenau, Merhavia 1957).



I am left puzzled here, if the Nazis ran a death factory in Auschwitz-Birkenau, why would the Jewish prisoners join them at the end of the war? Why didn't the Jews wait for their Red liberators?



I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start to ask the necessary questions. We should ask for some conclusive historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws. We should strip the holocaust of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place



65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz we should reclaim our history and ask why? Why were the Jews hated? Why did European people stand up against their next door neighbours? Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East, surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history? If they genuinely planned to do so, as the early Zionists claimed, why did they fail? Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews? We should also ask for what purpose do the holocaust denial laws serve? What is the holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocons agents' plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes against humanity.



As devastating as it may be, at a certain moment in time, a horrible chapter was given an exceptionally meta-historical status. Its 'factuality' was sealed by draconian laws and its reasoning was secured by social and political settings. The Holocaust became the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it is the most sinister religion known to man. It is a license to kill, to flatten, no nuke, to wipe, to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It made vengeance and revenge into a Western value. However, far more concerning is the fact that it robs humanity of its heritage, it is there to stop us from looking into our past with dignity. Holocaust religion robs humanity of its humanism. For the sake of peace and future generations, the holocaust must be stripped of its exceptional status immediately. It must be subjected to thorough historical scrutiny. Truth and truth seeking is an elementary human experience. It must prevail.





*During WWII and after it was widely believed that soaps and lampshades were being mass produced from the bodies of Jewish victims. In recent years the Israeli Holocaust museum admitted that there was no truth in any of those accusations.



http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/truth-history-and-integrity-by-gilad-atzmon.html









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













33 - Total Figures for German Slaves After World War II





Nation - Number of German Slaves Held

United States - 140,000

Italy - 30,000

Britain - 460,000

Soviet Union - 4-5 million, est.

France - 680,000

Yugoslavia - 80,000

Belgium - 48,000

Czechoslovakia - 45,000

Luxembourg - 4,000

Holland - 1,300





Source: International Red Cross.

Thanks to THE BARNES REVIEW for this information.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

















34 - During Hard Times Should You Know Some Basic Gardening Skills

Copyright © February 19, 2011 by Robert Wayne Atkins, P.E.

All Rights Reserved.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Occasionally I read advice on the internet from people who do their very best to discourage other people from engaging in any type of gardening activity, or from engaging in a specific type of gardening activity. For example, you may have occasionally read one or more of the following suggestions on the internet:



Don't waste your time planting seeds. Always buy your vegetable plants, and fruit trees, and nut trees from a garden supply store.



Don't waste your time trying to grow some type of vegetable or fruit tree or nut tree. They will probably all die anyway. Instead you should just buy your vegetables and fruits and nuts at a grocery store.



Don't waste your time preparing your meals yourself. Just go to a restaurant and let them do all the work for you.



It is not uncommon for the above advice to be offered by someone who lives inside a big city and who has no place to grow anything, or by someone who does know know how to prepare a tasty meal from scratch.



I personally do not agree with any of the above advice. For example, if you live inside a big city, and if you have a window that gets good sun for several hours every day, then you could still experiment with a few small vegetable plants in some containers in front of that window. All you would need is a small bag or two of "potting soil," and some "Miracle Grow Fertilizer," and some planting pots, or some small plastic containers. Each plastic container should have a hole or a cut in the bottom of the container to allow excess water to escape. Put something under the container, such as a dinner plate, to catch the excess water. You will also need one small package of vegetable seeds, such as radishes.



Radishes are recommended for a small window garden for the following reasons:



Radishes are small and they don't require much space.



Most radish varieties will grow to full maturity in about 25 days.



Radishes may be eaten fresh or added to almost any type of fresh salad. This means there would be no waste, assuming you like radishes.



Radishes will produce more radish seeds if you don't harvest all the mature radishes. Simply allow two or three of the mature radishes to continue to grow below the dirt. Each mature radish will eventually send up a seed stalk and when that seed stalk is mature you can harvest it. Inside the pod at the end of each seed stalk you will find a new batch of fresh radish seeds for your next planting.



If you make a mistake then you will know about it before one month has passed. This will give you the opportunity to try again and avoid making that same mistake a second time. Therefore the learning curve would be very short and the knowledge you would gain could be significant. Plus you would gain some self-confidence in your gardening skills.



If you have children or grandchildren this could be a simple project to help them learn how to grow food from seeds.



Think about this for a minute. One small window pot would allow you to gain some practical hands-on experience with one of the basic fundamental necessities of life -- food. You could learn how to grow vegetables, and how to grow seeds from those vegetables. After you have gained this knowledge then you could repeat this process again, and again, and again for the rest of your life -- if you should ever need to.



Anyone who believes that affordable food will always, always be available whenever they need it at the store, or that their emergency food supply will never, never be exhausted, is betting their life and the lives of their loved ones that the future will never be radically different from the present.



Therefore I strongly recommend that you invest just a little of your time in learning how to grow food from scratch. If you never need this skill then you will not have wasted anything. On the other hand, if your life and the lives of your family members should one day depend on your ability to grow food, then you would already have some practical real world gardening experience that could easily make the difference between whether or not your family survived a serious hard times tragedy event.











Home Gardening Tips by

Robert Wayne Atkins, P.E.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The information on these pages could be useful to anyone interested in gardening. However, they were written with the average home gardener in mind. By home gardener I mean someone who plants and maintains a small garden each spring using a simple shovel, hoe, and rake. These are the basic hand tools I use each year and they have consistently served my needs in my small home garden quite well.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





During Hard Times Should You Know Some Basic Gardening Skills? - Added February 19, 2011.





Vegetable Recommendations for New Gardeners - Added January 14, 2011.





How to Harvest, Process, and Store Vegetable Seeds - Added May 1, 2007.





How to Grow Each Type of Vegetable Seed - Added May 1, 2007.





Heirloom Vegetable Seeds Available on the Internet - Added May 1, 2007.





How to Grow Fruits, Nuts, Grapes, and Berries - Added March 1, 2011.





How to Grow Fruit Trees From Seed - Added March 1, 2011 and Revised July 1, 2011.





How to Convert Human Waste into a Safe Garden Compost Fertilizer - Added December 31, 2008.





The Benefits of Mulch - Added May 17, 2008.





Ant Hills: A Simple Solution - Added October 1, 2008.





How to Survive Hard Times (Index of Articles).





Recipes for Hard Times, including Acorns, Hickory Nuts, Squirrel, and Wild Game. (Index of Recipes)







-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













35 - SIX Kinds of Pills Big Pharma Tries to Get You Hooked on for Life

By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet



Posted on April 26, 2012

http://www.alternet.org/story/155170/6_kinds_of_pills_big_pharma_tries_to_get_you_hooked_on_for_life



Why has Big Pharma failed to produce new antibiotics for deadly infections like MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococci), C. Difficile and Acinetobacter baumannii even as they leap from hospital to community settings? Because there is no money in it.



Pharma executives "have shown less interest in medicines like antibiotics that actually cure disease than in those that only treat symptoms," writes Melody Petersen, author of Our Daily Meds. "Most blockbusters are pills for conditions such as anxiety, high cholesterol or constipation that must be taken daily, often for months or years. They are designed for rich Americans who can afford to buy them." Nor are medicines for tropical diseases like malaria, which kills a child every 30 seconds, a priority, notes Petersen. They also lack ka-ching.



Since direct-to-consumer drug advertising debuted in the late 1990s, the number of people on prescription drugs -- especially prescription drugs for life -- has ballooned. Between 2001 to 2007the percentage of adults and children on one or more prescriptions for chronic conditions rose by more than 12 million, reports the Associated Press and 25 percent of US children now take a medication for a chronic condition. Seven percent of kids take two or more daily drugs. Who says advertising doesn't work?



Of the top-selling drugs in 2011, led by Lipitor, Nexium, Plavix, Advair Diskus, Abilify, Seroquel, Singulair and Crestor, none is taken occasionally, or "as needed" and the treatment goal is never to get off the drug, like an antibiotic. Why would Pharma deal itself out of the game?



There are two ways Pharma hooks the US public on prescriptions for life. First, prescriptions that used to be taken as needed for pain, anxiety, GERD (gastroesophageal reflux), asthma, mood problems, migraines and even erectile dysfunction, gout and retroviruses (in some cases) are now full-time medicines. Instead of having a bad day or heartburn, you have a disease like anxiety or GERD which calls for full pharmaceutical artillery. Instead of having body pain to be treated transiently, you are put on an antidepressant like Cymbalta or seizure drug like Lyrica or Neurontin indefinitely.



Secondly, many of the top-selling drugs today are to prevent chronic conditions like high cholesterol, high blood pressure and osteoporosis that people are said to be "at risk" for. Needless to say, in both cases, people never know if the drugs are working or whether they would have had symptoms without them. This creates a loyal customer who is afraid to quit a prescription because it might be working. And why should they quit anyway when a third party is probably paying?



Here are some drugs -- not all -- that are marketed for perpetuity.



1. ADHD and Drugs for Pediatric 'Psychopathologies'



Thanks to Pharma's "diagnose early" and screening campaigns, millions of children are treated with stimulants for ADHD and antipsychotics for bipolar disorder and assorted conduct, oppositional defiant, development disorders and "spectrums" today. No wonder Michael Bandick, brand manager for Eli Lilly's popular antipsychotic Zyprexa, called it "the molecule that keeps on giving" at a national sales meeting.



But giving kids daily drugs creates two problems. First, parents will never know if their kids would have outgrown their conditions, and second, it's unlikely they'll ever get "clean." In fact, Pharma marketers worry about the revenue threat of kids going off their meds when they leave home and even run an ad campaigns in college newspapers to keep them on. One ad shows the lead singer of Maroon 5, declaring, "I remember being the kid with ADHD. Truth is, I still have it." The ad's tag line reads, "It's Your ADHD. Own It."



2. Hormone Replacement Therapy



When the popular HRT pill Prempro was launched by Wyeth, now Pfizer, in the 1980s, then-CEO Bob Essner told sales associates, “We can make real the full promise of HRT to create in the near future a world where the majority of women will start HRT at menopause and continue on it for the rest of their lives,” reports Philadelphia magazine. The scheme of treating estrogen "deficiency" for 30 or 40 years worked until 2002 when HRT was found to cause breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, blood clots and dementia. They were some of the conditions it was supposed to prevent. Oops. But Pharma has not abandoned the billion-dollar franchise and news about estrogen benefits is creeping back into the news, predicated on the public's short memory. People don't lose hormones because they age; they age because they lose hormones, say Pharma hormone sellers. Even men now "suffer from" testosterone deficiencies or Low T.



3. Happy Pills



Pharma's success in convincing people with anxiety or the "blues" that they need an antidepressant was a Wall Street coup. Instead of taking the occasional Xanax, people agreed to alter their entire body chemistry with a drug they took for months, years or decades.



But as antidepressants fall in popularity, because of their many side effects, including alarming "discontinuation symptoms" when people try to stop, WebMD is conducting damage control to keep people on them. Don’t believe that antidepressants turn “you into a zombie,” make you gain weight, ruin your sex life, make you "forget your problems rather than dealing with them" or cost too much, says the huge pro-pill Web site in one article. Depression is linked to heart disease, obesity, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and cancer says a second WebMD article. Stay on your meds.



4. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)



Some say gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is just lowly "heartburn" whipped up by Pharma into a profitable disease. But over 110 million prescriptions were written for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) like Nexium and Prevacid in 2009, making it the third most prescribed class of drugs. Long-term use of PPIs increases the risk of hip, wrist and spine fractures, the FDA warnsand the drugs can cause potentially lethal C. difficile-caused diarrhea and community-acquired pneumonia says national health advocacy group, Public Citizen. But Pharma has a different message. GERD can lead to esophageal inflammation, scar tissue and cancer, if untreated, it tells patients and symptoms won't go away on their own. No wonder doctors call PPIs "Purple Crack."



5. Statins



The best-selling statin drugs like Lipitor and Crestor that lower their cholesterol risks are pretty much the definition of "lifer medications," taken in perpetuity. Who would dare to go off of them and risk cardiovascular events?



One patient on a cholesterol drug site writes that despite feeling "miserable" on statins, "What do you do? Go off the statins and let your arteries clog up?" But medical professionals say it is not safe to stay on statins indefinitely. Patients are at risk of liver dysfunction, acute kidney failure, cataracts and muscle damage known as myopathy, reports British Medical Journal. And statins can also cause memory loss and increase the risk of developing of Type 2 diabetes and muscle damage,FDA warns.



Still the appeal of a drug that lowers the risk of cardiovascular events without a change in diet or lifestyle made Lipitor the top-selling drug in the world, until recently, when its patent expired. Statins are now prescribed for kids, for the same reason.



6. Asthma-Control Medicines



Like ADHD and "pediatric psychopathology" drugs, Pharma conducts aggressive early treatment campaigns for asthma drugs, recommending that children as young as one year be treated when "symptoms" first emerge. ("Before they go away,” says one cynical doctor.)



It has also marketed daily asthma "control" medicines like Advair and Symbicort so aggressively (prescription drugs added onto patients' regular asthma medicine -- ka-ching) that nearly two-thirds of the nation's millions of asthma sufferers take them. Despite the expense of adding an additional drug to rescue inhalers or inhaled corticosteroids when asthma is a lifelong disease, there are no clinical benefits to the upsell, says the research institute of Medco, the nation's largest pharmacy benefit manager. Neither trips to the ER or hospitalizations are reduced with control drugs. And there's another mark against the daily drugs that don't work: they may make asthma worse says some published reports.









Martha Rosenberg frequently writes about the impact of the pharmaceutical, food and gun industries on public health. Her work has appeared in the Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and other outlets.



© 2012 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.

View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/155170/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------













36 - The food industry is waging war on your cells with these 10 toxic ingredients

by S. D. Wells



(NaturalNews) Preservatives and synthetic food agents found in foods inhibit oxygen and delay the development of fungus and mold, creating a longer shelf-life for products. But after being consumed, these toxins deprive human cells of oxygen and rob them of nutrients, thus leading to cell mutation and the perfect breeding ground for cancer.



Just like humans, cells need oxygen to survive and thrive. "Fungus fighting" preservatives and man-made food agents choke out your body's nutrients at the DNA level by depriving mitochondrial cells of oxygen, sometimes completely shutting them down. And if the body does not have enough essential nutrients, it becomes more susceptible to disease.



Longer shelf life, shorter human life

If you're not a label-reader already, you better become one soon. You don't have to be a chemist or a linguist either, just be able to sight read and spot the poisons so you can live cancer-free. Most food toxins are followed by a phrase, often in parenthesis, to make them sound "safe" and in your best interest, like "as a preservative," or "for added freshness," or "to preserve flavor." These catchy little phrases really mean for the added choking of your cells to aid with cancer development.





The top 10 cell stranglers revealed

The United States has several major regulatory agencies and "cancer prevention" organizations which have not only been suppressing natural cancer cures for 70 years, but have been approving, supporting, endorsing and profiting from cancer-causing agents in food, beverages and cosmetics since World War II.



1. Sodium Benzoate: This stealthy killer flies under most people's radar, and is found in just about everything in jars and bottles, like salad dressing, pickles, sauces, mayonnaise, almost all soda and juice drinks, and even in foods labeled as "all natural."



2. Canola Oil: This artificial, Canadian-exported GMO is super popular and is found in over 30% of all products. It chokes out your mitochondrial cells. Canola oil is really rapeseed oil and can cause emphysema and respiratory distress, eventually leading to cancer.



3. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): The FDA allows 20 "pseudo" names for it including autolyzed yeast extract, free glutamate, glutamic acid, soy lecithin, calcium caseinate, hydrolyzed corn, hydrolyzed soy protein, and maltodextrin to name a few. Just because a product says "No MSG" doesn't mean it's not in there!



4. Sodium Nitrates (nitrosamines): Used for fertilizers and explosives, and as a solvent in the dry cleaning industry. This ingredient keeps hemoglobin molecules in your blood from carrying oxygen to your body tissues. It's considered a "super salt" (like MSG) added to things like hot dogs, cold cuts and bacon for added shelf-life, color and flavor. Problems compound when microwaved.



5. Margarine: The body cannot incorporate trans-fatty acids into membranes, thus causing deformed cellular structures. Vegetable shortening and partially hydrogenated vegetable oils accelerate aging and degenerative changes in tissues.



6. Anti-foaming agents: (Dimethylpolysiloxane) An industrial chemical used in caulks and sealants. This component is mostly used in fast food chicken nuggets and eggs. Also watch for TBHQ, a petroleum derivative, used as a stabilizer in perfumes, resins, varnishes and oil field chemicals, and linked to stomach tumors and DNA damage.



7. Anti-caking agents: Chemicals that absorb moisture and prevent other compounds from sticking together. These are added to table salt and powdered food products. They are often composed of phosphate, carbonate, silicate and oxide compounds which contain aluminum. Watch for sodium alumino-silicate, alumino-calcium silicate and aluminium silicate. Aluminum is linked to Alzheimer's and is also used in flu shots and vaccines.



8. Artificial colorings: Synthetic petrochemicals made from petroleum, antifreeze and ammonia. Blue #1 causes kidney tumors in mice. Red #2 and Blue #2 cause brain and bladder tumors in rats. Red #3 causes thyroid cancer in animals, and is banned in cosmetics, but still allowed in food. Red #40 debilitates the immune-system. Green #3 causes bladder and testes tumors. Yellow #5 and #6 cause adrenal tumors in animals.



9. Emulsifiers: Carrageenan, polysorbate 80 and brominated vegetable oil (BVO). These are stabilizing, smoothing and thickening agents. They are typically found in chocolate milk, cottage cheese, ice cream, infant formula and jelly. BVO remains in body fat for years. Polysorbate 80 is also found in most vaccines.



10. Artificial Sweeteners: Aspartame, Acesulfame K, Sucralose, Sorbitol, Truvia, and of course, Saccharin. Because they taste sweet, these chemical sweeteners trick the body into ingesting them and holding on to them for extended periods of time, turning rancid in the body fat. Fake sugars are the "Trojan horses" of the cell-choking and mutating, food agent industry. Sorbitol is also found in many vaccines.





America has been breeding and treating cancer with chemicals for 70 years

How does a politician running for office or for a position with a United States Government regulatory agency guarantee winning that election or appointment? He or she simply supports the insidious toxic foodand medicine industry by meeting with lobbyists, promising the approval of chemical food agents that strangulate human DNA cells, and furthering legislation which supports cancer treatments to do more of the same.



Besides the wars in the Middle East, there's a Domestic War going on right now in our country, so pay very close attention to everything you eat, and every "medicine" your doctor recommends. Also, do some research of your own if you want to protect your cells and keep them oxygenated, preventing cancer and other disease.



Sources for this article include:



http://www.truthinlabeling.org/nomsg.html

http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/f-w00/nitrosamine.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/033726_sodium_benzoate_cancer.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/022194.html

http://www.naturodoc.com/library/nutrition/margbutt.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_food_additives

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0813/is_2_26/ai_5399620









OTHER ARTICLES





Merck ordered to pay $321 million criminal fine for illegally marketing Vioxx painkiller

(NaturalNews) Drug giant Merck & Co., creator of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil, has been ordered by a federal judge in Boston, Mass., to fork over $321 million in criminal fines for illegally marketing Vioxx, a dangerous painkiller drug...













Monsanto buys leading bee research firm after being implicated in bee colony collapse

(NaturalNews) Amid all the controversy over genetically-modified (GM) crops and their pesticides and herbicides decimating bee populations all around the world, biotechnology behemoth Monsanto has decided to buy out one of the major international firms...











Sponsor: 3 Common foods that cure acid reflux without potentially dangerous drugs.









Fiberglass fibers cause lung diseases and cancer

(NaturalNews) The case against asbestos in building materials was finalized after decades of research traced several severe lung cancer incidents to asbestos poisoning. Now fiberglass, the replacement for asbestos, is under similar scrutiny for the same...















Medical science and herbalists agree: hawthorn berries are a "great heart food"

(NaturalNews) Hawthorn berries (Crataegus laevigata or Crataegus mongyna) have been treasured for centuries as a botanical treatment for heart disorders. The brownish, wrinkled false fruit of the hawthorn tree are full of antioxidants. Both...











Sponsor: Weird Hidden Discovery Shakes Medical World. Click Here for the Full Story









Cops take DNA samples from Calif. middle school students without parental consent

(NaturalNews) A group of students at Albert Einstein Middle School in Sacramento, Calif. was recently considered to be guilty until proven innocent in a murder case involving a 13-year-old girl. The Sacramento Bee and other sources are reporting...















Health crimes against humanity

(NaturalNews) Greedy corporations, mad scientists and powerless (controlled) politicians do NOT care about you and me. Chemtrails are poisoning the sky, fluoride is polluting the water and our food supply is a dumping ground for dangerous chemicals. Do...















Boost your brain with chocolate! Raw chocolate, raw food and happiness with David Wolfe, Steve Adler on Mental Health Exposed

(NaturalNews) Learn the benefits of the world's tastiest superfood, raw chocolate, on this episode of Mental Health Exposed. Raw food mogul David Wolfe and...















Sponsor: Can Just One Pill Repair, Revitalize & Energize Your Body? Learn about the Incredible $12.50 Solution.













2012 Senate farm bill perpetuates corporate monoculture with entitlement programs and insurance subsidies

(NaturalNews) Every five years the Farm Bill is reviewed by Congress to decide how government funding should be allocated to different aspects of agriculture. Depending on what source you explore, there are mixed signals emanating from the Senate's 2012...















Independent research identifies cancer-causing chemicals in food packaging, fabric coatings

(NaturalNews) An independent scientific panel has determined that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), also known as C-8, a commercial substance produced by chemical giant DuPont, causes kidney and testicular cancer in humans. And because of how pervasive this...















How women may benefit from bioidentical testosterone therapy

(NaturalNews) Women experience a precipitous drop in estrogen during the years surrounding menopause. Ten or more years before the ovaries shut down, there are gradual declines in both progesterone and testosterone. Both are rarely measured in the course...















Mad cow disease detected in U.S. dairy cow; South Korea halts all US beef sales

(NaturalNews) It's baaack! Mad cow disease, our favorite prion from planet Bovinopolis, has once again reared its ugly folded protein head in a California dairy cow. It was detected there just a few days ago, but have no fear, courageous American beef...











Health Ranger to host preparedness defense course: How to safeguard your home, family and private property when things get crazy

(NaturalNews) It has become increasingly apparent to me that most people who think they're protected against a serious calamity (grid down, social unrest, natural disaster, economic collapse, etc.) are really only kidding themselves when it comes...















Health Ranger releases 'S-Men' science parody video - watch it here

(NaturalNews) In the spirit of making fun of really bad science -- and these days there's plenty of bad science to go around -- I've just released a video parody called the "S-Men." It features a collection of scientific superheroes who help protect the...